The Sustained Pre-Eminence of Value Ontology

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

It’s still the only thing. That is to say, the only European philosophic branch that matters.

Nietzsche, power, values, the value of power, power as (the) value, value as (the) power;

there is nothing else, really

Our structural integrity, our ‘soul’, depends wholly, as we all know, on the values we pursue and uphold. All of us can be seen doing his - all of us cling, sometimes desperately and violently, to what we perceive as our bottom line values.

If we dont our being, our self-experience, disintegrates.

2

During this atrocious time, where stupidity, cowardice and credulity, passivity of the soul, absence of the soul, seem to be rewarded, the pre-eminence of the self-valuing logic is actually harder than it has been before in my experience;

the temptation to give into other values, to values that directly negate ones own value-integrity, is greater than it has been for a long time - perhaps than it ever was - and thus the rewards for staying true are also, comparatively at the very least, extremely high.

Those who dare to draw their actions from their own integrity are the happy few, the happy isles… emitting the Supermanly pathos.

3

For two thousand years this will be taught (likely) and only then will it have been ingrained in the majority of the species.

It is a hard task.

What the key-weight of it is, is to de-trivialize real existence in the face of ideal, abstract existence;
its task is, the task a one who ventures to attempt to think in terms of valuing as being is, to face existence directly. To no longer attain an idea of its through abstraction, but to engage it immediately from and within the core of ones own consciousness, the kernel of it, the ‘heart’;

to endure the heart as the actual fact of existence, instead as that which reflects on, suffers, enjoys existence.

To endure ones own valuing (loving, needing, any kind of valuing) as existentially equivalent to the structural core of existence itself;
this is the explication of “Hadit”, per Crowleys cosmology, he had not yet explicated it.

I bring together the work of Crowley and Nietzsche.

4

Love is intrinsic value recognition, or consent recognition, because if you are what you do (rather, if we are and do the why… because you can’t pretend to do the why on your own steam for very long…) then the valuer is valuable. even if they don’t recognize it. Note that you did not give them anything—you merely recognized it, and helped them see it, too.

True power sets free … from the cognitive dissonance resulting from the cognitive distortion that fails to recognize the priceless value of every valuer.

5

Last night I had a dream I got this free booklet thing, inside the booklet was a pamphlet, inside the pamphlet were some assorted goodies, such as MLP collectibles. I got really excited for the MLP collectibles, even though IRL I wouldn’t have valued it so much. IRL I am more of a robot or something, I don’t much see the point of collecting trading cards and such unless it makes money for me.

So I think Value Ontology is a good philosophy to have, it is better than being a robot or something. Ideally all consciousness in the universe would be destroyed, but if not, then all consciousness should be kept in a maximal dream state, in order to maximize the “valuing” of consciousness.

Silenus philosophy is that “all people would be better off never being born, but if not, they should die as quickly as possible.” I think there is a flaw in that, as it implies some barbarian anarchy, which could be construed as a devaluation of life.

The Garden of Eden story kind of depicts a loss of value, after eating the thing they kind of exit the dream-like state. Hyper-rationality, intellectuals and more consciousness is kind of opposite to valuing.

Another thing is hypergamy, hypergamy causes people to value less, because people no longer value materialism and money for materialism and money’s sake, instead, they seek money only as a way for themselves to become valued, starting from a position that they weren’t being valued. For this reason, cishet normality must be destroyed.

Another thing that must be destroyed are all forms of garbage software, any software that is buggy, glitchy, unintuitive, lacking features, too much bloat, etc. Because it interferes with an artist’s flow, and thus causes more devaluing in society. People who defend such software deserve death, along with vibe killers, ice cream drivers, fireworks users at night, etc.

So I think Value Ontology is a good human philosophy but I don’t think it should be used as a scientific framework, I don’t believe in panpsychism or that anthromorphizing atoms to “value” something is appropriate