Comment on it, or follow the trend and make your own similar post.
It’s fairly straightforward. A list of what I accept in general social systems and why. A list of what I reject as people seem to think of them as a tangible importance to a cause.
THINGS I ACCEPT–
*The anthropic principal.
It’s weird the way that everything happened, and the likelihood is next to impossible . . .
Our universe, the earth, our living bodies.
But then we would only exist where these circumstances would take place in a vast sea of possibility. So don’t bother try to think about if further. It’s likelihood IN our context. Its probability just doesn’t matter to our perspective. No need to further analyze it.
*The unknown god.
The universe is not well enough understood. Whatever is out there is just not assumable. But no evidence implies that it needs to be found any time soon. Why rush.
*Industrialism
Humanity and naturality is dieing or dead. There is nothing left to follow our primitive ways. It’ll never come back. We’re converting into a species of more efficient energy solutions and machines that soon supercede us. Who cares if you can’t live the way you wanted. You’re a cog in a machine. Maybe not in the most fundamental terms (sure, believe in a soul or whatever) but in society you’re just turning the gears. Let the machine take over.
THINGS I REJECT
*Capitalism.
Energy is useful. Money is meaningless. It represents nothing. A swarm of stupid people exchanging bits of exchange for exchange value for . . . more exchange value. No end. No base. Nothing. It’s pointless. It’s crap. You’re rich, you’re poor. It has nothing to do with fair equity. You just got to exchange in some lucky breaks . . . and you know how to play the arbitrary system enough to be content with the fact that what you’re dealing with is meaningless except to get you stuff. The bombing of a large bank would make people scream “terrorism” and politicians scream “recession.” Yet all in all, it would be the RIGHT thing.
*Intellectual Property
You own the things you can fend for. In some ethic, maybe you could even own a building you’ve never even been to. But owning “thoughts” is so utterly stupid. So one might argue that it’s more literal. You own . . . the --application-- of thoughts. Big difference. You own what someone might randomly do in some random place. As long as it gets trated, it blips on your radar of ownership? The whole concept of intellectual property should be blown to bits starting with the bombing of a patent office . . . my solution to a lot of things involves bombing, I guess.
*The family unit
Living with the family is meaningless. Human beings deserve to be herded like cattle, serving the prospect of energy efficiency and possible intellectual use. Whom you are stuck with is somewhat irrelevant. Don’t even bother with foster homes. Just round up with whatever human they stick you with. Let it have a little more freedom than jail, but really . . . the jail environment is what we’re looking at. Humans all belong in random combination within some megacomplex to coldly foster their life and offer venues for their random eccentric thoughts . . . the minimums to retain sanity and health.
*Spiritual designation
We all have things we believe about the way things are. Identifying ourselves as such is rather meaningless. Sure we can say, “I’m atheist” or “I’m Christian.” All in all, your practices don’t really change because you’re stuck in the necessity to survive and follow the culture of wherever you are. You have liberties of opinion, you really have no liberties to “practice” any beliefs unless you consider it valid practice to pray over nicknacks and clutch a book that’s rather randomly authored. If you’ll really do so, go ahead, it doesn’t so much matter.
*Pacifism
Every body faces the possibility of cancer. An unwelcome trend can easily occur. And some unwelcome trends really don’t care if you welcome them in open arms or resist them, they’ll screw you up the same. Pacifism is the greatest joke I’ve ever heard.
