The USA Died Today

wendy, for the record, there are such things as facts. it is a fact that what urwrong is saying is the way he wants things to be and not the way that they are under the law with regard to whether social media companies and isps are considered utilities. he is simply wrong.

would it be nicer if the way he wants these things to be were the way that they are? maybe, maybe not, doesn’t matter as much as understanding the real distinction between what it true and what is false. currently under all interpretations of the constitution that matter, it is simply not a violation of one’s 1A to deny them a platform.

I understand what you are saying so alternative platforms need to be formed but that doesn’t change that there’s no point in arguing with evil.

Ur, some of the laws as they stand support evil. Companies are not by law required to follow their own policies.

Nicely summed up.

amazon ended their deal to support parlers web infrastucture today so they have to build their own whole new thing from scratch and itll be wonky af and also down for a week or so

Sort of. Really more about the people recognizing that capitalism isnt working for them like it was promised to. It took a good few hundred years for this to become a fact and not just a theory.

Now that it’s on it’s way out, everyone who does not suffer the failings of the system is fighting tooth and nail to keep it. And who can blame them… they were living for free!

Capitalism may be on its way out, but it’s not going to be replaced by what many on the left are hoping for.

And we don’t have capitalism, we have woke corporatism, where corporations get subsidized by government for being woke.

We’re not going to get a populist socialism, we’re going to get an elitist socialism, where the middleclass is robbed to give a lot to the rich, and a little to the poor.
Where men and the majority are robbed to give a lot to the rich, and a little to women and minorities.
These gifts to the lower classes, women and minorities will come with huge strings attached.
They will have to give up their life, liberty and whatever property they have left.
They will be branded, genetically modified, restricted, sterilized, tracked and traced, like animals.
It won’t be democratic socialism at all, it’ll be plutocratic, technocratic reverse socialism and anti-socialism.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uqu5rR8JK5YV/

I’ve emphasized the part you have factual evidence to support, and then where it goes off the rails into wild speculation, to aid in understanding.

Bitchute, by the way, is not a reputable source. You’d might as well post a link to efukt or liveleak.com.

When individuals are interested in an intelligent, earnest discussion, they find reputable sources to back up their thought processes.

Garbage in, garbage out with most of you.

In 2020, in Canada, the US and much of the west, we had more welfare, and a lot more socioeconomic control.
1st the socioeconomic restrictions came, then the welfare.
That’s how the elite has dealt with us, and that’s how they’ll likely continue to deal with us.
From the past and present, we infer the future.

How did you infer cell phones from the technology of the ancient Egyptians?

Neither is the MSM, they lie, and they lie.
They are owned by TPTB.
In many ways, more grassroots sources are more trustworthy.
I trust my fellow plebs more, in many ways, than I trust the archons.

It’s degrees, the more distant the past, the more difficult it is to use to infer the future.

And the more esoteric the subject, the more difficult it is to make predictions about.
Using yesterday and today’s socioeconomic conditions to predict tomorrow’s socioeconomic conditions, is a lot easier than using the 3rd millennium BC’s technology to predict the 21st century AD’s technology.

Disagree with this baseless claim.

Great video from Arnold Schwarzenegger, a REAL strong man and American patriot.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_P-0I6sAck[/youtube]

An analogy, if a new species is discovered (the future), and we want to make some guesses about it, we should mostly study species most similar to it (the present, the near past), not species most different to it (the distant past).
If you want to get to know a phenomenon, you study a similar phenomenon.
In all likelihood and most ways, the near future will be a lot more similar to the present and near past than the distant past.

I think it’s safe to say the socioeconomy is a bit easier to make predictions about than where technology is headed, for most people.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txXfT2nLJ-w[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tArtYkILiHc[/youtube]