What a great example! Such sluts, exploiting men for food just because they’re so hungry, for drugs just because they have this disease called “addiction”, for a warm secure place to sleep just because their environment is so cold and unsafe, and to live in a van just so as not to have to battle the elements! What were they thinking—that men would share those things with them out of the goodness of their hearts? 
1 Like
A case where women are willing to seduce and exploit men to get whatever they want in sexual exchange, it’s the same for all women or females in all spectrums of human social hierarchy interactions whether it is lower class women, middle class women, or upper class women. Just different methods and social environments of the overall same pathological psycho sexual mental state of females everywhere which is biological sexual capitalism where human sexual interactions are a marketplace of power dynamics. Men need to have something in terms of material resources to engage in sexual relations with females, and this sexual dynamic of sexual reproductive trade is very much exploited by females everywhere in majority. (Only a rare minority of women being even remotely the exception.)
That’s a gross exaggeration, as is illustrated by the fact that you had to resort to such an abysmal example. And even insofar as you have a point (which of course you do have to an extent), you refuse to acknowledge the 5,000-year-old fact of patriarchy, of it being a man’s world; the ancient poison induces the need in you to feel proud of being a man, as well as to hide behind your “flippant” persona—not just from others, but first and foremost from yourself.
1 Like
And the reason men are violent, psychotic, forever warring, or fighting is to get resources because female sexual reproduction revolves around male dominance which naturally implies the need for male inequality of constant competitive infighting. I can argue this point all day if you wish, it changes nothing.
That, too, is an exaggeration. It sounds more like the common chimp than like the bonobo—and both of these exhibit 100 times more physical aggression than human humans.
Still, here, too, you have a point, of course. The differences between the sexes did not spontaneously arise only 5,000 years ago. Yet you must take into account the emergence of agriculture (including non-nomadic animal husbandry). This first brought about great economic inequality, and it was only industrialization, around the 19th century, which brought about an even greater leap.
1 Like
I mean if you want we could talk about the history of human female biological sexual capitalism throughout the ages from the prehistoric era to the modern era, it’s present thoughout all of human history where it didn’t just spontaneously come into existence with industrialization. I do love the ridiculous absurd notions of feminism, particularly how the greatest enemy of women are women themselves. Also, our most ancient ancestors were in close relation to what poses as the modern chimpanzee today, so there’s that.
Lastly, women thrive off of male inequality of men oppressing other men, that whole sexual attraction to assertive male dominance thing. Just no way getting around the female alpha male sexual worship, you all do it, it’s like male violence is biologically hardwired into the female sexual brain.
Yes, it may certainly seem like it. But this whole discussion between you and me is about how hardwired it really is (and, more generally, this being a philosophy forum, it’s ultimately all about nature..):
There’s a ginormous difference between “our most ancient ancestors” and “from the prehistoric era”. In fact, the former phrase isn’t even accurate, since our most ancient ancestors would at the same time be the most ancient ancestors of modern [and ancient!] chimps: some kind of single-celled (LUCA) or even pre-cellular (FUCA) lifeforms. I think you mean our most ancient ancestors who can still be considered human.
As for the latter phrase, prehistory was long: it lasted from around 3.3 million years ago to—and there you have it—around 5 thousand years ago. So yeah, any feminists who think gender (stereo)types came about a century or two ago are severely mistaken, but so are those who think they have existed as long as there have been humans. (200 years may be peanuts, but so is 5,000 years—just a bag of peanuts rather than a handful.)
1 Like
Do you like nature documentaries? I know that I do, the studying of various survival psychological behaviors of a variety of animal species. It really makes you wonder how our natural world works in all the multitude of various underlying intricacies.
One of my favorite animal species concerning odd and entertaining sexual behavior is Ovis Canadensis, also known as Big Horn Sheep.
The male rams will for several hours on end ram into each other with their elongated horns to the point that sometimes horns will tear off bleeding in these sexual displays of courting a female ram in estrous, some cases the brute force of these altercations a male ram will die because of the violent physical intensity.
The female ram just watches from a distance idly observing in estrous of these competitive sexual mating displays, she has no general concern of the physical well being of either male ram, the female ram is just a dumb animal and a slave to sexual biological instinct in that the only thing the female feels at an animal level is that the victor of these huge ritual male mating displays will be allowed to seed her afterward. The lesser inferior male is sacrificed in these ritualized animal mating displays of projected power in that only the stronger are allowed to reproduce their genetic line for the next generation of Big Horn Sheep, because for the female the success of projected male power is the only thing that matters. In much of female mating systems within nature, male failure is never tolerated and is always rejected, such is the case of constant competitive inequalities. In human civilization we see similar sexual behavior, although more complex and shrouded within various activities maintaining society.
It always amuses me when feminists say they’re anti capitalism, the very sexual nature of women is socioeconomically capitalistic and psychologically capitalistic as well. Simply put, feminism is capitalism.
Women inside the feminist movement will say they care about gender equality, they do but of course when women say things like that they only mean for themselves. The very idea that women care about the equality of men is laughable.
The idea of gender or sexual equality between men and women concerning feminism is a hilarious one considering female sexual behavior revolves around the constant inequality of males concerning the power structure inside society.
Imagine a world where all men are equal, there is no inequality of physique, career, income, education, wealth, individual power, and of anything at all, female sexual behavior as it has always existed since the beginning of human history wouldn’t know how to function at all in such an environment because female sexual behavior is directly tied to the tyranny of mankind.
If human female sexual behavior didn’t revolve around male sexual capital, male inequality, and male oppression over each other a majority of women in terms of reproductive behavior would be reproducing with men of the lower or lowest ranks of society. Reproduction and fertility rates would be spread out more evenly within all segments of society.
But of course that’s not the case at all, is it?
In fact, if you see what is trending on Tik Tok within female spaces it’s something on the lines of, “God has cursed us with the majority of poor and ugly non-attractive men.” Such public displays of sexual narcissism at the peak of feminism politically, and we’re to believe this is the fairer more gentle innocent gender of homosapiens? That women are somehow less vicious than men?
Yet the feminist narrative would have us believe women are oppressed in human civilization or under economic capitalism despite their own sexual selection process being entirely capitalistic biologically themselves. I can go ad nauseam as to why I view feminism to be nothing more than absurd bullshit.
Are you a sheep, Joker?
1 Like
What kind of question is that? I was wondering when you were going to respond to my points as I felt like I was talking to myself there for a minute.
Don’t tell me that’s all you have in terms of counter arguments. How boring..
Unfortunately for you, you needed to lift your ‘act’ and relate to women (and men) not trapped in unfortunate circumstances such as these. The experiences you write about are not normal interactions between men and women, they are about serious survival issues and after 15 years of this lifestyle, I guess ‘normality’ eluded you.
It is not normal in 2025 to trade ‘fucking’ for shelter, food and safety.
What eluded you was the damage these women were experiencing. Very few women or men would come out of this unscathed as you have demonstrated here on this Forum.
1 Like
I need to do nothing, I am married and have children of my own. I am not a single man anymore, but I do have memories of living in the gutter of society as a single man for many years, and you’re right, that kind of psychological trauma never goes away, the memory always remains intact. It’s as fresh today as it was several years ago.
It’s the same no matter what segment of society we talk about concerning women always evaluating men by resources, wealth, physical appearance, success, social influence, and such.
It’s the same for the female crack addict on the street, the middle class suburban soccer mom housewife banging the town sheriff, or the illustrious billionaire trophy wife woman looking to expand her wealth with a man more wealthier than she is. As I said previously, no matter what environment or segment of society the same pathological behavior of sexual marketplace capitalism is prevalent by a majority of women everywhere. There’s only an extreme minority of women capable of transcending their primitive instinctual behavior and that’s not saying much because there’s so few of them around.
I am surprised there are any.
1 Like
Female virtue seems to be in short supply these days.
1 Like
This smacks of a bitter rejection from a woman somewhere along the line.
1 Like
Single? More like a multitude as a younger man. If I had $100.00 for every awful woman I’ve encountered over the years, well, I would be $20,000.00 richer now.
I see and hear about the problems of radical feminism in society by younger men where I feel for them because I had similar experiences when I was young. There’s not a lot of older men to part them any useful wisdom or knowledge either. I really empathize with them.
This is out of my realm of experience.
I can only imagine (with horror) the base circumstances these people experience living on the streets.
But there is still no blame, for it can happen to anyone of us. God forbid and I would hope I could still show some compassion to those less fortunate.
1 Like
Unfortunately I see the United States on the verge of collapse on the horizon much more worse than the Soviet Union ever did, if it happens in the future I already have massive experience living off of nothing where I am a professional at it, I only worry about my family, not so much about myself. 