Theory: Sexual Capitalism

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Feminism’s Buzzwords: How Women’s Studies Rewrote Reality

When was American Academia infected by a nihilistic worldview, and through US dominance the entire world was infected?

During the 60’s.

Strauss and Frankfurt School began to dominate US academia.

Revising history, through Straussean rereading of texts, under his guidance, to find the subtexts that would correct them.

Popper 's “Open Society” was being sold to baby boomers, coming of age.

When was Wokism seeded in the minds of America’s youth?

It is when neo-cons were being trained to take over America.

It was when Kennedy was assassinated (successful coup) and Nixon impeached…ending America’s sovereignty.

[ProfessorX]

Sexual capitalism at its finest.

Those girls could be anyone. Offer to pay them some cash and just about any girl would be willing to do that stuff, even on camera. And if the guy is hot enough and the car is expensive enough they’ll happily do it for free.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

For females sex is their only source of power.

Control of the ovum is power.

Deciding who fertilizes it is their power…this is why rape is so distressful to them.

[Carleas]

@Lorikeet

Deciding who fertilizes it is their power…this is why rape is so distressful to them.

This strikes me as a common and mistaken understanding of rape.

First, men are also clearly distressed by rape, and seemingly more so than women. Colloquially, rape metaphors are used in lots of male-male communications, both in connection to physical threats and as symbolic dominance posturing (e.g. taunting in sporting contexts). In either case, raping men is stereotyped as an attack on their manhood, with the victim being ‘emasculated’. These metaphorical uses strongly imply that men see male-male rape as distressing.

And academic research seems to support that male victims of rape are more affected by it than female victims, though that claim is hard to test directly. Male victims commonly describe themselves as “shattered” by the assaults, and they are prone to PTSD and suicide [1], though men are generally more prone to suicide so it’s difficult to isolate the effect of rape. Men are also much less responsive than women to anti-suicide interventions following a rape (though the effectiveness of interventions in women are also low) [2].

Second, this interpretation of rape seems to center male interests in women, i.e. in women as tools for male procreation. Rather than interpret a significant violation of bodily autonomy and physical safety as primarily distressing because of the violation of bodily autonomy and physical safety, it interprets it as distressing primarily because of its effect on sexual value to men.

It seems related to the male perspective on virginity/purity, and men’s greater concern for the loyalty and monogamy of their partners. It’s also related to an assumed male ownership of women, interpreting rape is a violation of the rights of the men in that woman’s life. Seen through that lens, it assumes that what a woman loses in the assault is what those men lose, i.e. her chastity, or her value on the sexual market.

But again, the way men feel about male-male rape seems to align with the first-order effects (violation of physical control/safety) being the primary cause of distress. Men do not have those second-order concerns, so those can’t be the cause of their distress, and yet they experience distress as great or greater than women. Moreover, those first-order effects are more socially central for male-ness (thus the idea that men are ‘emasculated’ by being raped), which would explain why men appear to be more distressed by being raped.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@Carleas

Forcible sexual rape occurs because men feel powerless in quiet desperation which in my opinion only illustrates how women possess sexual power over men and is intensified ideologically with the radical feminism that is prevalent everywhere.

Females are sexual capitalists, males are sexual proletariats in the activity known as human reproduction.

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

Forcible sexual rape occurs because men feel powerless in quiet desperation

There has to be more to it than that. There’s a lot of quiet desperation, and small % of those with it who rape.

So, about what year did women get the sexual power?

@MrAuthoritarian

Females are sexual capitalists, males are sexual proletariats in the activity known as human reproduction

Would women be the sexual commodities in capitalism? Some men have the money and others don’t to ‘buy’ that commodity? Other qualities can replace the money to buy that commodity. Let’s look at the commodification of women? Where’s that coming from? Female dominated media? Female fashion designers? Female movie makers? Sure, there are some of these, but the dominant force in these are men. They raise up women with certain qualities and say, that is an incredible commodity. Watch our hero put his life on the line again and again for her? The designers? They certainly have aesthetic impulses, but the main idea is to create desire in women for things that will make her beautiful to men, and to create desire in men to want those commodities wearing the commodities they make money from?

Who created the sexual capitalism? Who is getting rich off it literally? And who is treated as a thing, however well they are treated? And how do they pay for their own purchase? Who told women that their value is what it is? That was women???

And why do leftist and feminist heterosexual women put less emphasis on the man’s wealth? Right leaning women put a much higher premium on their man being wealthy.

Women did not set up this system though of course they contributed to it. We can blame the women, but if you follow the money behind these ideas, you will find a lot more men than women.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse
@ProfessorX

Just to be clear in this conversation rape is never justifiable and should be morally or ethically condemned. I just want to add that as an addendum in this continuing conversation of ours.

Yes, as with most criminal acts it is a low percentage nonetheless all criminal acts rape included is because of individuals feeling powerless in their life circumstances where they violently lash out against the rest of society or other people. In systems of organization where inequality or inequity are at their highest you will find simultaneously an increase in criminal destructive behavior.

Inequality and inequity especially when there is lots of it brings out the very worst in human beings.

1960s onwards by my own historic account and of course with every new rendition of radical feminism in transformation it becomes less about sexual equality ironically.

Women make themselves into sexual commodities which makes the position of feminism very ridiculous and absurd.

Pretty much, yes. Women in terms of exhibited sexual behavior, mental pathology, or psychology are attracted to male physique, wealth, social status, and general public prestige. This is the very basis of female sexual capitalism.

For females the sexual marketplace of capitalism is one of constant competing males to otherwise afford their sexual companionship or affections. With women sexuality is all about working, earning, buying, and affording their social company. If a man cannot buy it outright next after that is rent seeking sexual behaviors for a price.

I would argue women are natural and biological sexual capitalists where their sexual behavior has been almost constantly the same since the neolithic era of human hunter gatherers. As human society or civilization has evolved female sexual capitalism has evolved along side it.

Of course, with the advent of state enforced economic national capitalism female psychological sexual capitalism intensifies with that as there you have capitalism of sexual interactions compounded with an environment of economic market finance. The very worst exhibited human behaviors of capitalism meet together creating a wicked social atmosphere that feeds human corruption.

Sexual capitalism increases the power of hypergamous sexual interactions, so naturally the minority of very powerful, affluent, and wealthy men benefit from the freedom in allowance where female sexual capitalism flourishes. The biggest losers are the large majority of men that become poorer and powerless in this hierarchical organization where they’re cut off from all sexual interactions altogether being deemed unworthy. As a system becomes more unequal less men reproduce, get married, have opportunity for sexual intercourse, and having children offspring. Which basically describes why the modern social fabric is eroding everywhere culturally today.

As I said earlier female sexual capitalism is a natural biological phenomena that has always existed since the time of ancient primitive hominids. Throughout human history different civilizations, cultures, and nations have regulated female sexual capitalism in various different ways so that it never got out of control. But from the 1960s onwards with the advent of radical feminism the dominant ideology is to let female sexual capitalism and psychological behavior be completely unregulated to the point where we see modern gender cultural wars of today. That is the result of female sexual behavior or the sexual marketplace being totally unregulated by radical feminism.

Women individually set their own sexual values, no two women are entirely the same in those regards, but if you look at the broad sexual behaviors of women altogether there are precise similarities concerning overall patterns of sexual preference.

Before I got married myself I have dated women all over the political ideological spectrum. So called conservative women are more transparent when it concerns their own sexual capital and so called leftist women are more devious in trying to conceal theirs. At the end of the day both of their standards are very similar and even the so called bleeding heart leftist women shun men they view as unworthy which of course illustrates general hypocrisy not any of that should be very surprising at all.

Once again female sexual capitalism is as old as time itself where feral human beings in the wild a woman would judge a male on his ability to procure shelter, food, and protection away from predatory animals or predatory human males. The female evolutionary psychology of sexual exchange is a primordial one, nobody has invented it, such has always been. The female sexual impetus of separating weaker men from the stronger, ignorant from the more intelligent. Such is the ruthless nature of human female sexuality and general mental psychology of the so called gentle nurturing sex.

All of this is the very basis of female sexual capitalism and sexual exchange. One way or another as a male you got to pay to play.

[MrAuthoritarian]

Sexual capitalism:

Being a prized coveted single young woman holding all the keys to sexual reproduction she manipulated a bunch of male proletariats or suitors in providing her free restaurant dinners and food utilizing the power of her own sexuality to acquire it. She pretended to have romantic interest in those men by deception.

[greenfuse]

@Lorikeet

Deciding who fertilizes it is their power…this is why rape is so distressful to them.

Yeah, the experience itself is pretty much neutral.

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

Being a prized coveted single young woman holding all the keys to sexual reproduction she manipulated a bunch of male proletariats or suitors in providing her free restaurant dinners and food utilizing the power of her own sexuality to acquire it. She pretended to have romantic interest in those men by deception.

Hard to counter anecdotal evidence like this!!!

Except the scams in terms of money and frequency generally go the other way. The Romance scams where the main targets are older women.

Or shall we talk prostitutes. Look at those capitalist bitches. The men with the money paying for sex, they aren’t capitalists. Nor are the pimps - though I can concede that pimps have taken a giant hit from the internet, so I can see some of the ‘proletariat’ have lost some ground.

Calling women ‘sexual capitalists’ and the men the proletariat is like blaming an iPhone for the existence of Apple. The iPhone didn’t invent consumerism; it’s just the commodity adapting to what the buyers with the cash are demanding. Let’s time their prep for a date.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse

What is more likely here?

1.) A majority of women looking for wealthy male suitors in dating, reproduction, and marriage prospects?

2.) A majority of men looking for wealthy female suitors in dating, reproduction, and marriage prospects?

Pick one that is the most logical best explanation of the reality we live in and then explain what caused you to make your final decision.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse

It’s interesting you mention pimps in this dynamic exploration exercise here.

As I have said elsewhere, there’s a small minority of men very obviously that controls all of the world’s wealth, political power, and overall global systems of organization.

In a way they’re kinda like the pimps of societies, nations, and whole entire civilizations in that they control all the lower ranks of men under them within authority with promises of money, women, the ability to have families of their own, and comfortable life stability in existential security.

Of course, that level of control they have requires that they keep the majority of men content away from rebelling against them because if they don’t…

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

1.) A majority of women looking for wealthy male suitors in dating, reproduction, and marriage prospects?

2.) A majority of men looking for wealthy female suitors in dating, reproduction, and marriage prospects?

Pick one that is the most logical best explanation of the reality we live in and then explain what caused you to make your final decision.

1 is more common. I don’t think a majority thinks they have a chance, but they’d be thrilled and no doubt fantasize that. If it was on the table, they’d go for it.

But that’s one not evidence that women are more sexually capitalist. Capitalists purchase what they want. Capitalists use their wealth to have other kinds of power. Of course, most men (and women) don’t have wealth, but they buy into this capitalist system. Men buy sex or simulated sex more than women do. They purchase sex or try to spend money to get sex. Somehow for you this is not capitalism. And all those guys directly buying sex or buying simulated sex (porn) and spend money to get sex, they are all hoping to find ways to get more money so they can buy more sex or buy the best sex (and/or most attractive mate). They engage in the same processes that the wealthy men do to the degree they can. They cannot offer the wealthy date. They do their best. They do buy sex, those men who do, though of course they can’t buy the ‘highest quality’. They purchase porn or settle for free, but would move up if they could. Everyone is trying to move up - except people who don’t give shit and you can actually increase your chances of meeting those people. A man with a steady job is more attractive, whatever the job, than one who has no job. And that’s true for a lot of non-wealthy men also. Yes, physical attractiveness is a big draw, but you think the plumber wouldn’t prefer a nurse as a wife to a woman who sometimes works in fast food places or is unemployed? That’s not a main point, I recognize that women look to the man’s job or wealth more. Men look at looks more than women. It’s a resource they hope to buy or win over. IOW capitalism. It’s like a Corvette or Lambourghini, the woman’s beauty.

It’s all capitalism, though some people have to barter their beauty for potential income. Which isn’t just sex. They are looking for relationship.

It’s all capitalism. Those that have these values (there are romantic people).

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

In a way they’re kinda like the pimps of societies, nations, and whole entire civilizations in that they control all the lower ranks of men under them within authority with promises of money, women, the ability to have families of their own, and comfortable life stability in existential security.

I agree that there is way too much power in very few hands. But the real power people aren’t pimps. Even Epstein, who could be called a very high up pimp, is still on the outskirts of the elites. Pimping is generally a not wealthy ‘profession’. Unless the trafficked are a very special category and can be used in near perfect safety.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse

I was talking more on the lines of controlling or disrupting female sexual behaviors as a tool and instrument of controlling men by institutions of power.

In order to control the men you must control the sexual behaviors of women since sex to men is a carrot on a stick like to a work horse.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse

They don’t think that they have a chance?
What do you mean by that?

You forgot the number one practice by capitalism and capitalists alike, the monopoly of production. Taken to the behavior of human sexuality the monopoly of sexual reproduction.

Again, the market of lust or pornography I would argue is more about financially exploiting single lonely men. It is the exploitation of male loneliness and sexual desire.

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

I was talking more on the lines of controlling or disrupting female sexual behaviors as a tool and instrument of controlling men by institutions of power.

In order to control the men you must control the sexual behaviors of women since sex to men is a carrot on a stick like to a work horse.

Beer, sports teams, numbing media, fast food, lotteries, ‘news’…keep them constantly sexually stimulated through advertising and media.

The strategy for women has a lot of overlap.

[MrAuthoritarian]

@greenfuse

Material things are poor substitutes, the greatest desire of men is always women or females. The greatest motivational impetus for survival is reproduction.

[MrAuthoritarian]

Sexual capitalism is things like Gwyneth Paltrow making millions of dollars selling vagina scented candles.

[greenfuse]

@MrAuthoritarian

Sexual capitalism is things like Gwyneth Paltrow making millions of dollars selling vagina scented candles.

LOL. I’m not sure exactly what it is I hate about that, but I hate it. Not particularly because vagina smells are involved. I think it is the positive facade that is actually just pure Machievellian marketing.

It would be funny to make a line of penis smelling candles or muffins.