They actually made a disgusting joke gag line of potato chips that is suppose to smell like dicks as they advertised it. This has become the absurdity of our modern world.
I remember when I was young and single if you approached women in the bar they would laugh at you, sometimes cuss at you loudly, or even throw a drink in your face if they didnât like you.
My how the times have changed and it would seem younger men know the score all too well.
I also suspect younger men donât have a lot of disposable income like previous generations concerning present day economic hardships. Consequences of purely only caring about the advances of women in society at the expense and demonization of men in general. Weâre now living in the resulting aftermath and seeing the consequences everywhere.
Men and women are more divided between each other than ever before where it is going to take a lot of effort to repair the ill effects of multi decades of radical feminism along with poor financial economic theories that leaves so many people including men behind.
Why arenât a majority of women attracted to McDonalds or Walmart male workers than they are to male billionaires?
If all men need is a steady job or income as you say then there should be no chronic single loneliness epidemic factor for men at the lowest economic strata.
Youâre not making a very good case that women or females care about things outside of male dominance.
[A majority of them anyways. ]
I didnât say all men need is a steady job, just that it still affects their attractiveness.
Iâve confirmed that women will go for more wealthy men, just as men actually will toward men (and gays towards men). But men are more affected by physical attractiveness. Overweight women, not considered attractive women. They can get sex because men donât have to connect feelings with sex in any way, any type of feelings. But to get a marriage? or a longer term relationship?
Thereâs money and then there are things that bring value. In the market men and women to varying degrees prioritizes different things for value - a big dick will get you laid as a man, but perhaps not married as much as laid. Low income, big dick. As long as that gets around and you clean yourself, dress with at least a clean t-shirt and jeans, youâre gonna get laid, word gets around. This doesnât make that guy a sexual capitalist more than his smaller dicked peers. Even though he stands a much better chance than his peers of having sex with richer women. Funny men are much more likely to get laid. Attractive women. Large breasts. This can get you laid. Sexual capitalism isnât just about money. Itâs about value. Some men will want a women making money. Some will want her to be willing to have a number of children and keep her career on hold sometimes. They want the kids or both kids and more money. A woman with a trust fund, trust me, men will find more attractive.
You can focus on part of this. You can make it seem like because women want money in their partners more than men, they are more sexually capitalistic. But the men are buyers in those scenarios. Itâs like if a corporation buys its office supplies from another company only one of them is capitalist. But office supply company doesnât buy anything? This somehow makes it more capitalist???
What is money. Money gets things. Can be cars, food, attractive partners, yachts, one night out a month for a restaurant meal. Itâs all moving resources and what is values around, buyer, sellers, traders are all capitalists, in a society that is materialistic.
Itâs like the men are buying sex, but somehow this makes the women capitalistic, but not the men. Itâs like you take this one thin slice.
Yes, things such today. The elites are reducing the amount of money people can get and this hurts the lower incomes more. No question. And whatever the women may want, there are not that many wealthy men to go around and the competition is stiff.
1 Like
Why does it affect their overall male attractiveness?
Actually from what I have seen homosexual men donât judge other men on economic financial criteria either all that much.
Fascinating that only one gender bases their entire sexual values and judgements on financial, economic, or public social status criterias.
For me what you just said proves nothing other than men and women negotiate, haggle, or calculate in trade what they can get in capital exchange.
Sure, an overweight woman cannot get the type of men she wants compared to a physically fit woman but she still has more sexual leeway than an overweight man.
Likewise a homeless woman is more valued, protected, and presented with more opportunities than a homeless man. I would argue we live in an era now where the most average woman has more power, value, or influence than the most average man.
Let me know if I am missing anything here if you need more clarification on the current subject. I am enjoying this conversation thus far.
Because for most men sex is a release, just, with very little risk, not part of a relationship. You understand that men can have an incredible amount of sex with many women and generally be seen in a positive light for that. It doesnât take much for a women to be considered a whore by men and then also, though secondarily, by other women.
Men canât get pregnant and men donât have the seen as slut issue.
So yes, women can walk into a bar and get laid, sooner or later, once the alcohol sinks in at least. But at what price?
Hell, given the nature of the genitalia and sex, women are more likely to get STDs from sex then men.
Men can divorce sex from emotion in ways that women are not built to (biologically and culturally - and men have a huge role in viewing women as sluts if they have a number of partners). And women are also more at risk for serious consequences than men are.
It is two very different acts, that same sex act. If men want more sex, then they should all clean that cultural shit out of their own minds and the minds of their brothers. Thatâs a good start.
The person with more to lose does end up being more selective and so it seems like they have power. If men wanted them to be less selective, there are a lot of things men could do. They could shut down the slut talk. What the fuck Jimmy, you wanna go back to when it was hard to get laid?
Pregnancy, the slut issue, having less ability to divorce sex from emotion (and punished if they do), stds.
This is a new line. I donât consider the other lines remotely countered, but I thought Iâd hit some new turf.