There's no Epstein Client List

Social Forums Current Events
101

Apparently Wes Lexner was the primary financer of Jeffrey Epstein and his blackmail / child-sex trafficking operation in the US. Both Lexner and Epstein were Jewish/Zionist Supremacists part of the “MEGA Group”, which are a collection of Western Globlaist Billionaires all supportive of international Zionism Supremacy.

Wes Lexner sold Epstein his New York mansion, which I believe might be the basis of the “Eyes Wide Shut” movie, which hinted at this network of Satanists and Pedophiles back in the 00s and 90s.

Here is an update on the Epstein files insider information for anybody not keeping up-to-date:

1 Like
102

Google AI search:
what is the connection between Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, the New York mansion, and Eyes Wide Shut?

There are connections between Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein’s New York mansion, alongside speculative connections to the film “Eyes Wide Shut.”

  1. Les Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship
  • Jeffrey Epstein served as the personal financial manager for billionaire Les Wexner, founder of L Brands (parent company of Victoria’s Secret), from 1987 to 2007.
  • Wexner granted Epstein power of attorney, giving him significant control over Wexner’s finances, according to a Columbus Dispatch story.
  • Epstein was a longtime trustee for Wexner’s foundations and was reportedly deeply involved in various aspects of Wexner’s business and personal affairs, according to Vox.
  1. The New York mansion at 9 East 71st street
  • The Herbert N. Straus House, a large townhouse on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, was purchased by Wexner in 1989 for $13.2 million.
  • Wexner renovated the mansion, but never moved in.
  • Epstein began occupying the house in 1995 and publicly claimed ownership in 1996.
  • The property’s ownership officially transferred to an Epstein-controlled entity in 2011 for $0, according to The New York Times.
  • Epstein’s mansion became known for its bizarre and disturbing decorations, according to The Cut.
  1. Eyes Wide Shut
  • The film explores a secret society and masked orgies involving the wealthy elite.
  • There are comparisons drawn between the fictional events in the movie and Epstein’s real-life activities, according to Newsweek.
  • Some theories suggest that the film’s themes and visuals were intended to allude to or expose real-world high-society sex crimes.

Connections and overlap

  • Wexner’s mansion became Epstein’s primary New York residence, and it was the site of some of Epstein’s alleged sexual assaults, according to The New York Times.
  • The decorative elements within the mansion, described as “creepy chandeliers and body-part art” by Katie Couric, evoke comparisons to the unsettling imagery and themes depicted in Eyes Wide Shut, according to a Newsweek report.
  • The relationship between Wexner and Epstein and Epstein’s subsequent actions have been the subject of speculation regarding possible connections to the themes explored in the film about the dark underside of elite society, according to a Reddit discussion and a Hyperreal Film Club article.
103

https://www.reddit.com/r/StanleyKubrick/comments/z29n01/establishing_the_connection_between_eyes_wide/

New to this subreddit and watched Eyes Wide Shut for the first time. As I’ve read on previous EWS-related posts, one of the best working conspiracy theories is that Kubrick was attempting to expose Hollywood sex slavery/child sex slavery, most similar to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex parties, though there may be other parallels. I was wondering if anyone had more tangible evidence to support this theory? For instance, did Kubrick know Epstein/Weinstein? Did he ever speak out against child slavery in other forums?

Thank you!

“Larry Celona is a longtime New York Journalist who was the media consultant on eyes wide shut.”

happyLarr

•3y ago

Larry Colena worked as a consultant on Eyes Wide Shut so he had a personal connection to Kubrick. He also reported on major crimes in New York for over 20 years before the Epstein case. There’s no real ‘joining of the dots’ here, it’s not even a coincidence, it’s his job.

The idea that Kubrick would subtlety hint at or leave clues to an elite sex cult by literally depicting an elite sex cult is so silly. The movie is far more interesting and deeper than that.

Beneficial-Sleep-33

•3y ago

I believe there is a visual cue that is supposed to suggest Epstein and Maxwell. At Ziegler’s party when Alice walks off to go to the bathroom there is a an intentional continuity error where a woman walking with a silver haired man who looks a bit like Epstein transforms into a woman who looks very much like Maxwell.

I believe the ‘Epstein’ insert in EWS movie, is supposed to be the tall silver-haired guy dancing with Nicole Kidman, perhaps…

(https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1752924260009811
.webm)

104

Updates about Epstein and Trump:

Concerning my personal stance, I don’t care for whataboutism argumentation from the American Leftists… Bill Clinton was a huge client for Jeffrey Epstein. Joe Biden regularly groped young girls, on camera, in front of the Nation, and Leftist-Lib-Democrats actively looked the other way on a regular basis. So neither the political Left, or Right, has any type of Moral Highground concerning the systemic trafficking, rape, and human sacrifice of small children. In general, the ritual human sacrifice of children is an (((Elitist))) affair, and among the lower and poorer classes, practicing Satanists. It happens. But that’s not the point… the point here is how the US Government, in collusion with foreign governments (Israel/Mossad/MEGA Group), facilitate and protect these practices and social circles.

I’ll get to the point. Concerning my posts and responses in the last two days, apparently, supposedly, there was a 11-13 year old girl that goes under the anonymous pseudonym “Katie Johnson” that performed oral sex (fellatio) upon Donald Trump, during one of his forays and parties with Jeffrey Epstein, while Epstein himself had sex with girls of the same age, at the same time, during that specific instance. This Kate Johnson victim, was paid off and threatened, around Trump’s first Presidential run in 2016. At that time, Democrats did NOT use the Epstein information against Trump, because it implicated the Clinton Foundation, Hollywood actors and executives, Leftist/Liberal social circles, and the US Government in general… all blackmailed by Israel/Mossad through Epstein and especially Ghislaine Maxwell.

Shortly, the US Government CANNOT, EVER let these informations out, and especially to the US public, because it would cripple if-not destroy their Legitimacy forever. An Illegitimate Government has short shelf-lives throughout history. So this is not a Partisan political issue. It is far beyond Partisan. This information won’t go very far on this forum, because of the Leftist partisan hacks, which are rampant on here (especially including Caerles the forum Admin).

The Trump Administration, currently, are planning to throw a few key figures in the Epstein List, under the bus. But they are planning to do it in such a way as to spike the rest of the list, and attempt to ‘move on’ to the general public. This may or may not succeed or fail. That is hard to determine, at this point.

I am assembling all this information, because of how it relates to Trump’s comment that he disavowed his “past supporters” over the Epstein list – to me, that was a specific, unintentional admission of Guilt. So, to me, that does symbolize that he is implicated in his crime with Epstein, specifically with “Katie Johnson”. Epstein eventually had a falling-out with Trump, rumors are, over the matter of Ivanka Trump and sexual advances toward her. Or, sexual advances by Epstein over other young daughters, at Trump’s properties and golf courses. Apparently he overstepped his bounds, as far as Trump was concerned.

Regardless, all of these will be fascinating matters of State in the coming years, and especially in the 2026 Midterms. Trump did NOT need to throw his voting-base under the bus. That was a huge blunder, and to repeat, I believe it was an unintentional public admission of Guilt. This is not intended to “give ammo” to the Political left. But rather it is for the sake of Truth only.

105

The WSJ described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it.

106

I suppose it is for the best.

107

That would explain why some Nations treat their females like sh*t, then!

108

I’m not sure where you got that from, but I like this:

109

The Jewish identity was first forged as slaves under the Egyptian Pharaoh by which they had no access to power except servitude to the Pharisees. Female Jews were the only means that they could establish and preserve their identity, since male slaves were regularly castrated, or circumcised in the case of “Good Jews”, where good slaves were allowed to sexually reproduce, to a degree. Their reproduction was under strict supervision. There wwas regular purges and depopulation of the slave populations, when they grew too large. Slaves were regularly starved and/or worked to death.

In those circumstances, religious and spiritual identity were pressured into the females, hence why females are revered by Jews specifically. They are Matrilineal as a result. Matrilineal identity is opposed to Patrilineal (Roman-European) identity. Matriarchy vs Patriarchy. Father vs Mother preference.

110

Interview from 2022:

111

You’re an intentionally bad historian & you should hang your head in shame.

112

There’s no historical or archaeological evidence that actually happened.

1 Like
113

There’s zero evidence they were ever slaves in ancient Egypt, more than likely they made that all up. They were supposedly slaves of Babylon also.

114

Anti Zionist Jews are an extreme minority of Jews, a majority of Jews are pro Zionism.

It’s a fringe small sect.

1 Like
115

They killed her father, it’s really not that far of a stretch.

1 Like
116

Prove it. So far you’ve been skeptical about every demographic anyone has presented on ILP without presenting contrafactual evidence of your own. So how are you gonna back that claim up?

1 Like
117

You, sir, are contributing to the delinquency of a joker. Three separate issues being pushed together, to start with. You both know this.

Annoying.

118

Everybody in the Jewish community knows this, even outsiders with a good knowledge of religious history knows this.

The vast majority of Jews approve of what’s happening to the Palestinians because they’re just as religiously zealous as radical Muslims are. You Christians are in such denial over the Palestinian genocide it’s unreal. God’s chosen ones in majority approve of the Palestinian genocide, the cognitive dissonance within Christians in their collective perceivement of Jews is amazing.

The vast majority of Jews are actively Zionist politically, no amount of denial will ever change that.

1 Like
119

The ad populum fallacy.

120

The issues overlap.