I put a lot of work into this. Please take your time to take this seriously. Be certain that you are understanding the intricacies I placed into it. Thank You! This theory will explain how the planet’s moons are mathematically designed - that is, if you follow my work path - not the current path of Science, which is still philosophically naive (Nikola Tesla said it himself). While reading, you’ll have to understand that the Solar System is based on three systems under certain conditions: Fibonacci Sequence, Moon Count and Moon Count Difference. I will have a question at the end, so feel free to come up with reasons for it. If - if you can get through this mathematical complex:
Fibonacci is amazing, geometry of all and everything.
Nikola did say Science was naive.
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” ― Nikola Tesla
Seems like a serious case of apophenia.
The Fibonacci pattern is the result of a specific type of growth (constant offspring growth from cycled seeding), pretty easy to understand and predict. What you seem to be suggesting, through extreme grasping, is that the Solar System GREW from a replicating seed. 
But I have to admit that I don’t see the pattern that you are suggesting, especially with the words;
“The Solar System Was Shuffled Between Earth, Mars and Pluto” … ?
In what way is the Solar System “stuffed between” Earth, Mars, and Pluto?
Thank you for your admittance and self-humility. That is why I am here; to discuss where the errors may be, whether it be in my vision or your vision.
Now, to answer your inquiry. The planet’s number count for their moons aren’t in the right order. The current order is 1/2/70/62/27/13/5. This makes sense for my theory which is based on “The Fractilian Monster” [the planets are in the pattern of small > medium > large > medium > small]. However, the numbers were not in order. I switched up the planets so that the number of moons were in the right order whilst considering the Fibonacci Sequence. Now, it’s more accurately 1 (Earth), 2 (Mars), 5 (Pluto), 13 (Neptune), 27 (Uranus), 62 (Saturn) and 70 (Jupiter). This is the “shuffle” I was talking about earlier. I proved there was a connection to the “shuffle” because there is NOTHING left for Jupiter’s number of moons (70), except for it being 8 away from 62 (Saturn’s moon count). Adding the numbers of the moons between the planets and the planet that was first shuffled (Pluto), you get 1 + 2 + 5 = 8. Not only that, my theory based on the “shuffled planets” also shows evidence that the Universe was, at one time, in this order. However, the Universe is known for “inverting” itself to create physical life. One example of inversion can be found in how our eye-sight is actually up-side down within the eye. We see things right-side up. Another example would be how we are metaphysical creatures (emotion, information) which project metaphysical forces unto a physical realm which is also subatomically animated and driven by the metaphysical forces. The Universe created us in its image, therefore my theory is touching on the Universe’s “old” design. It could not use this design because the Universe is using inversion to lead itself to creation. Yet another example, the relationship between how males and females procreate, volcanoes and soil or black holes and stars spread fundamental particles of life. The Universe is going forward, by evolving from its backwards version. In other words, this Universe is the best psychologist we have. It recreates itself, by reflecting on its older parts, hence why our entire human experience is able to recognize the primitive and out-dated drives of nature. Nature does not run from its past - it defines itself by changing itself in correspondence to its past failures. That is why the planets were shuffled. The Solar System could not thrive off of blue being a dominant color - red is the primal instinct; the fundamental frequency of the entire Universe. It drives our primitive nature, our anger and our arrogance. Blue is only communication; it’s an evolutionary result of the red frequency. If you don’t know what I am talking about, I’ll give you a real easy way to capture the beauty of what I am saying. Ask yourself but one question: “Why doesn’t the rainbow ever change its colors?”. Those “colors” are not mere visual feedback. They’re life itself.
By the way, if I did have “apophenia”, I would be intolerant to skepticism and overtly defensive over my claims whilst leaving out the context and the detail. However, I am mentally normal and intellectually stimulated to reason and to work with any non-corresponding components of this discussion if need be.
To my knowledge, Jupiter, for example, has only 4 moons. So how did you get “70” and/or “62”?
And I think that Saturn only has 9 moons.
You are responding to me based on what you “think”? Your numbers are way off. Do your research. I wrote specifically “take this seriously” for a reason. What I wrote is not for people who don’t exercise their time learning the actuality of their reality. All you have to do is simply search each planet’s moon count - there’s NASA data for this stuff; information provided by people who go out of their way to understand this world outside of “I think”.
By the way, I did notice your small sentence compared to my large paragraph. This tells me and the audience that you’re not here for the effort; you’re here for the ego. I put time and passion into my words, my thoughts and this interplay of information being sent back and forth. You wrote a sentence based on naive purposes. Please if you want to learn, take the first step by actually exercising intellectual stimulation. If you’re not interested, don’t respond. If you don’t understand, but don’t want to learn, don’t respond.
IMPORTANT UPDATE: In chronological order, the planet direction of axis spinning is Right > Left > Right > Right > Right > Right > Up > Up-Left. Remember when I said Pluto deserves to be by Earth and Venus? Perhaps my theory isn’t that far from the truth after all. In order from least degrees to most degrees: Mercury > Jupiter > Earth > Mars > Saturn > Neptune > Uranus > Pluto. In other words, it’s another pattern! Small > Large > Medium > Medium > Large > Medium > Medium > Small
Does a thousands words count?
But I guess you are counting the near orbiting asteroids;
Moons are very important to the Universal design.
Here’s why: http://snag.gy/OfZQs.jpg This is a complex particle system called carbon.
http://snag.gy/0AHQ5.jpg This is a simple particle system called helium.
I’m not sure if you have noticed, but in the Solar System, complicated planet systems have more moons, just like carbon.
Simplified planet systems with little to no moons are small, just like helium.
First realize that this is a philosophy site wherein discussions of the fundamental make up of the universe and the mind is common, both of which happen to be specialties of mine. But on the other hand, an astronomer, I am not.
So it seems to me that over the last decade or so they have added around 100 new “moons” to the Solar System. And I would expect that over the next decade, they will probably add maybe 20-50 more, since they seem to be now calling any orbiting satellite a “moon”. And when you examine the current number of moons they have declared, you can rearrange the planets in such a way as to form something close to a Fibonacci sequence.
Now If I go out to a tree in the yard and pick off specific leaves and rearrange them, I can very probably form a Fibonacci spiral. But what can I deduce of the tree from that? That it grows various size leaves. That’s about it.
Have you ever heard of “Cognitive Bias”? That is what they call the misjudgment that occurs when someone names things and then deduces from a general nature implied by the names. For example, if they had not named those asteroids, “moons”, but left them to be “asteroids”, that Fibonacci sequence wouldn’t appear. And also if you did not rearrange the planets to suit that sequence, it would not appear either.
Apophenia is a name given to the condition of people who seek too hard to find patterns in things that don’t really have such patterns such as to see them anyway. The universe certainly has patterns, but the lust to identify a simple, universal pattern causes people to fall into the problem of cognitive bias and see patterns that aren’t really there.
So If one were to accuse you of having such a condition, how would you prove that you did not?
I didn’t just arrange the planets in a Fibonacci sequence. I did that to make more sense of the planet order. I went further than that. I took the number of moons and I added them along with the Fibonacci Sequence in chronological order to give the sum of the next planet’s number of moons. That’s genius work, not ambiguous work.
See? You can’t even see the genius in my work. The part where I wrote:
Went right over your head.
Well, it is still “over my head”. But then that is the curse of being a genius.
You created a planet order different than the Solar orbit order commonly understood so that it would end up in the Fibonacci sequence if the moons were counted. It seems that the only purpose in choosing that order was to form the chosen sequence.
But you didn’t use “chronological order”. It appears that you chose a specific order that would allow the result you were seeking. How else did Pluto get to be in position 5?
That part, doesn’t seem coherent. Perhaps some notation is missing?
0 + Mercury = 0
1 + 0 + Venus = 1
1 + 1 + Earth = 3
2 + 3 + Mars = 7
Or perhaps you meant;
0 + Mercury = 0
1 + Venus = 1
1 + Earth = 2
2 + Mars = 4
Either way doesn’t seem to make sense with what you show.
Why do you have " 1 2 (Earth & Mars) "
What is that supposed to mean?
The order I chose was less moons to most moons. I have no power over how many moons each planet would have. What part of you does not understand that my formula would fall apart if, say, Pluto had 7 moons. 8+7 does not equal 13. 8 + 5 = 13. Then you have the other formulas, 5+8f=13/Neptune) 27 (14+13f=27/Uranus) 62 (27+14+21f=62/Saturn) 70 (Jupiter), which are just as susceptible to being destroyed if any number was different - numbers that are beyond my control. I didn’t choose it to follow the Fibonacci Sequence - these numbers already did! I simply discovered this design that existed already!
You don’t even understand the Fibonacci Sequence. Jesus Christ, can I please get a genius in here. I’m done with people who can’t even keep up to date with how many moons are in the solar system or what the Fibonacci Sequence is. Jesus, Ignorance is the only thing in this world that dares to fight what it does not understand.
Well yeah… according to James the Fibonacci does not exist. There are no patterns for turtles and giraffes supposedly. Except it’s on the Turtles shell and Giraffes fur/coat patterns.
What part of you doesn’t understand that Pluto does not come after Mars?
Again, if I merely choose leaves off of a tree, I can form a Fibonacci spiral.
It appears that is all you have done except with moons instead of leaves.
What part of you does not comprehend “theoretical”.
This Universe is known for using its old evolutionary states to make its newer states of evolution. (e.g dinosaurs > dogs and birds).
I am 100% certain that this Solar System was mashed up over time to fulfill its different priorities before life truly existed.
Much like how our heart has four stages of chamber development: Fish heart, frog heart, turtle heart and human heart.
As I said:
“Apophenia”.
… nuff said. The internet can’t be used to alter the reasoning of those who can’t reason.
Sorry, but I don’t have apophenia.
I have a formula that works.
You don’t have anything - you don’t even have an argument that works.
Hell, the technology you use wasn’t even built by you.
That’s how much you ride on other people’s successes and genius.
That makes you inferior.
Oh really?
I seem to know a number of people who would dispute that.
Last time I checked “a number of people” is an omen. Look at every history book known to man, you’ll only see cases of people coming together for wars, riots, gangs and mobs - whence cometh the time when people followed a genius?