I do not really like Ron Paul or endorse him as an anarchist that despises all government however I find it interesting when it concerns his censorship.
Technical issues my ass. Those technical problems are precisely cued, aren’t they?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TSxm2V8aVQ[/youtube]
Yeah, liberal and conservative channels alike seem to really, really not like to talk about Ron Paul. They jump through hoops to avoid saying his name even.
Indeed. Freedom bitchez!
Even as a centralist and federalist I like him more than a lot of the other politicians.
Yeah, at this point I can’t even be entertained by the sleazy herp-a-derp sideshow that is the Republican candidates. Ron Paul talks a lot of sense but it’s too fucking bad because he’ll be drowned out by a party of douchebags.
The impression I get is that Ron Paul is treated as a wild card and a radical because he doesn’t play ball (politics) like the rest of the candidates, and that’s scary for the those in power.
To be honest I would like nothing more than to see all of congress on a firing line. Shrugs
It’s all a side show circus to me but I will say that this censorship piece is so blatantly obvious.
You may eventually come to learn that basically every facet of life is a side-show circus.
The only way anarchism can work, in my opinion, is through truly evolved, specific-area systems like that espoused by Sammuel Delany in Trouble On Triton. So basically in his cities on these planets in the future, there are ‘free/no law areas’ but also areas with laws too. It would be like, if in Vancouver, the cops just didn’t go into East Van, and there were literally no rules. The anarchists, or whoever feels the need to operate in a system without set authority, are free to do so there, and the people who (most of the time) need rules, can have them. Delaney shows that these two areas can exist together harmoniously—to point, it’s the existence of two radically different areas that allows 1 (big) area to come to a social equilibrium such that you can run around playing The Warriors.
This saves us from the teenage absurdity of an entire society with no laws, with is really the most asinine thing I could think of an an answer to life’s problems.
You know I’ve had this idea for a while that if I were ever in a posistion of power, of having a large piece of land to not be placed under any sort of law, perhaps simply call it the frontier.
In order to give all the anarchists a place to go so they’ll stop whining about civilization.
The thing is if there was any news of horrible crimes being commited in such an area I don’t see how i’d be able to simply stand by and allow it to occur and intervening would undermine the whole idea of it being a lawless territory.
Given the painfully obvious reality of the futile doomed hopelessness of 99.99% of the human population, I’m surprised you haven’t apprehended the obvious suicidality of giving any of these cocksuckers authority over you.
I’ve noticed the people who tend to believe in government utopia are the ones who have the most cognitive dissonance when it comes to observing human nature and how most humans behave in reactionary situations.
There will always be structures to society. The idea of total anarchy is a physical impossibility given the trends of the universe.
Standing by that (staggeringly obvious) fact is easy. It doesn’t mean I relinquish authority to anyone more than an anarchist. Think about that.
If you knew who I am you might realize the comedy in trying to assert I believe in any sort of utopia. I never even said that word.
Anarchy or government it does not matter for human beings are always ripe with conflict.
This is something government supporters never like admitting because they are always trying to make themselves out to be the better. In all actuality they are no better where they are just as equally brutal or violent in their methods, actions, and ideas.
Ask yourself this, what is it that exists in an existence of anarchy that doesn’t already exist within a governed state?
The only reason government has been successful is superior organization of numbers. That is really it.
I like how government says that it is beneficial to everybody even when its organization causes great social inequality, depravity, and despair on many individuals. Government always does and will only benefit a few individuals at the expense of many.
Of course its an impossibility; but anarchy is only the eternal ideal. Obviously when the Roman Empire collapsed there was more anarchy and deregulation than when it was at it’s height. This is a good thing and the goal of any anarchist to try to facilitate intelligently.
The up and down history of human events makes anarchy a eternal. History is an expression of anarchism.
Anarchists are reactive destroyers upon inevitable conflicting interests. In any system conflict arises and the intricate parts or in our case individuals react in a collision course that there is no escape from.
What is often created must be destroyed.
We are all slaves to entropy much like everything else in the universe is.
Those that support notions of extreme high order must even succumb to entropy and the eventual disorder that follows.
Yes, and its also an Expression of Order.
And those that support chaos wil eventually be overcome by the power of Order and rebirth.
The Roman Empire succumbed to anarchy, but it wasn’t at all affected by anarchists. Anarchists are people who are infatuated with destruction and disorder. By definition they are not going to organize. Except at coffee shops to do absolutely nothing.
You’re completely wrong because anarchists often do organize to attain end goals. There are even anarchist militias and internet communities which I am not a part of but do support.
Anarchy isnt primarily about disorder; its primarily about destabilizing government as the butcher of humanity.
Destabilizing the, “Butcher of Humanity,” which will be effectuated by a Civil War? What purpose does that serve?
There’s a reason neither of us can name any.
this must be another troll post or you clearly didnt read my ‘why society really exists’ thread.
[size=150]PavlovianModel146 ![/size]
