He does not have/exhibit having, a high IQ.
The problem with totally secure hyper dimensional mirror realities are the fringes of consciousness. I am well aware of them. I’m looking to set up a system NOW (lately) where people can also join zero sum worlds and leave at will. I was too dictatorial in trying to move everyone to hyper dimensional mirror realities, even though I know that’s what they’ll eventually choose.
That who’s name should never be spoken, has never taken wings to fly or die trying. That who’s name should never be spoken actually still thinks in a sex dimorphic species that it’s ok for men to send sexual signals - basically a baboon. The human species has so much potential too - it’s sad to see.
I did(read above, in fact I always do that.
Note the above partial proposition is left bereft of being bonded }
quote=“Ecmandu”]
Ecmandu said,
"Narcissists are vampires. Apparently you’ve never met one. They need their narcissistic supply. So let me introduce you to one vampire: you.
Marriage is a contradiction outright, it is the celebration of the zero sum rather than the mourning and regret of the zero sum. Women only fuck contradictions. It’s ornate behavior.
People like you make my job a bazillion times harder, I have to figure out how to send that shit to heaven, just to solve my own problems.
Like I stated in the OP: You are bratty children
[/quote]
"
.
"Meno,
Toxic narcissism woos incredibly kind women, the romance period that they’re professionals at; Once the woman is sucked in, they seek to suck the life out of these women before moving on to their next victim. They certainly aren’t looking for a dominatrix."
Vampires, contrary to popular opinion , are gentle souls, whose strategy for marital bliss failed them.
[/quote]
Narcissists are vampires. Apparently you’ve never met one. They need their narcissistic supply. So let me introduce you to one vampire: you.
Marriage is a contradiction outright, it is the celebration of the zero sum rather than the mourning and regret of the zero sum. Women only fuck contradictions. It’s ornate behavior.
People like you make my job a bazillion times harder, I have to figure out how to send that shit to heaven, just to solve my own problems.
Like I stated in the OP: You are bratty children
[/quote]
I have met some, both, negative and positive.
Marriage can be based on outright contradiction, where the reductive set of the union leads toward sustenance of that contradiction.
The sustenance can be an epoche , or, a limited inversion of anima and animus.
The man among men or, the alpha man can sustain that inversion, if, and only if, the woman can do likewise.
In that case, domination will be invited, rather then rejected, the reduction from introjective to projective identification of roles will become variable , consciously, waken up, resulting in both: into 0 sum and non 0 sum probable inducements.
.
Exhibit A
My point is very simple (and also self evidently true by definition):
1.) Nobody wants their consent violated.
2.) Zero sum interactions necessarily always violate someones consent.
3.) Nobody wants zero sum realities.
There are two different types of beings in existence: Those who have their consent violated if anyones consent is violated and those who have their consent violated if they cannot violate the consent of others without consequence to themselves.
As far as gods are concerned: Any god would be proud to make a non-consent violating existence. It hasn’t been done yet. You’ll get a lot of backlash from gods who want to be supreme for pointing out that they haven’t done the ONLY good thing that can be done in existence.
Since nobody is replying directly to content right now. Let’s address the nay sayers about my contributions to philosophy:
One unique idea to me alone is that contradictions are the cheap illusions of extra energy. When people keep using these illusions, the actual world gets destroyed as the illusion doesn’t IMMEDIATELY kill the person using it, it gets dispersed. The damage is still there, it doesn’t go away just because someone isn’t struck by a bolt of lightning on the spot.
These cheap illusions are the ONLY thing that attracts women to men in this species as a mating call, this false display of extra energy, “Wow he contradicted himself but still exists, he must be powerful”
So when you get posters on this board who do nothing but contradict themselves, my revolution of objective thought is that they are doing it to cozy into the masses… any man who wants to get laid needs to use it, and obviously it is the darling of the female world, because that’s the only sexual and social signal they respond to without bitterness.
I’ve framed the subjectivists - that’s a huge revolution in thought
What else have I contributed to philosophy?
Objective ethics. Nobody wants their consent violated. I mean, how fucking beautiful is that?
From this, we can analyze existence proper as being moral or not, either as a being or not a being. The analysis is this, “Someones consent is being violated right now — existence is evil, bad, immoral - not neutral”
If we can prove that existence will ALWAYS and NECESSARILY be this way, then we can know that existence is INHERENTLY and INEXORABLY EVIL!!
Then we can make the moral decision that the best way to BE MORAL IS TO BE EVIL!!
Those are my contributions to philosophy:
1.) The objective solution to WHY people contradict themselves
2.) Objective ethics
Not bad for 42 years. These problems have been outstanding for thousands of years.
What have some of my nay sayers contributed to philosophy? Cooking recipes.
You decide who is actually contributing intelligence here.
I know a lot of you are angry at me because I not only gave you an objective way to falsify your gods, but to falsify you as god!
When I say that nobody wants their consent violated, and that all someone has to do is examine their own consent being violated to disprove a god… it makes it real. And you are all still living in the world of illusion. My nay sayers anyhow.
The best you can throw at me is that “nobody wants their consent violated” is just saying “nobody wants what they don’t want” is a meaningless tautology. Unfortunately the straw man doesn’t work. Logic is in it’s infancy on earth. EVERYONE knows what “nobody wants their consent violated” ACTUALLY means… the crude logic straw man is a joke of a refutation.
I’m giving you the power to falsify gods, and you folks are furious!!!