Fuck, the majority of the earths population is hurting bad and you’re worried about a prize? Buy yourself a box of cracker jack.
Rather than pissing on public discussion boards, there is one men actually doing real things to relieve that very problem - your worst nighmare, Mr Donald J Trump.
COVID-19 Vaccine in less than one year - 4 times faster than ever.
Yeah right… Trump has done nothing other then stand in the way.
“You too can loose four times the weight.”
How effective is it actually going to be? And who is actually paying for it?
Lie.
Willing defeatism. Hoping for the worst.
Pro-communist slave.
…the way of the Left …never letting the sitting government get on with the task at hand, shitting all over everything they do, and continually declaring them bad whilst deliberately ignoring all the good that they are doing.
Childish or what?
Yawn
Spoiled. Over privileged. Petulant. Irreverent.
And irrelevant.
…and obviously lost for words, when faced with the truth. 
Balking, at those that create the very state/State that protects them from the more savage and unruly, that would otherwise hunt them down as prey… and that’s just for sport and starters.
…and what is their response to all this? to go fishing.
It is what it is to paraphrase Trump
Me, I am disgusted by both parties. The vice presidential debate? Who answered an actual question… and who took more time then agreed upon?
I respect Mike Pence far more then I respect Trump.
So conservatives would have fought for independence from England? Not likely.
What is the “real” toll on the earths population and you’re worried about a prize? Are we making progress with our people getting on. Digging the life? All their greatest skills and capacities being fairly bartered for… in good faith?
Real mature of you.
For a sense of what maturity really is; dig this:
"POLITICO
WHITE HOUSE
‘Where are all of the arrests?’: Trump demands Barr lock up his foes
The day-long run of tweets and retweets marked the most frantic stretch of Trump’s public activity since he left Walter Reed.
Donald Trump mounted an overnight Twitter blitz demanding to jail his political enemies and call out allies he says are failing to arrest his rivals swiftly enough.
Trump twice amplified supporters’ criticisms of Attorney General William Barr, including one featuring a meme calling on him to “arrest somebody!” He wondered aloud why his rivals, like President Barack Obama, Democratic nominee Joe Biden and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton hadn’t been imprisoned for launching a “coup” against his administration.
“Where are all of the arrests?” Trump said, after several dozen tweets on the subject over the past 24 hours. “Can you imagine if the roles were reversed? Long term sentences would have started two years ago. Shameful!”
By early afternoon, Trump was letting loose his frustrations in an all-caps missive that seemed aimed at nobody in particular.
“DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, THE BIGGEST OF ALL POLITICAL SCANDALS (IN HISTORY)!!! BIDEN, OBAMA AND CROOKED HILLARY LED THIS TREASONOUS PLOT!!! BIDEN SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO RUN - GOT CAUGHT!!!” Trump tweeted.
The day-long run of tweets and retweets marked the most frantic stretch of Trump’s public activity since he left the presidential suite at Walter Reed Medical Center and returned to treatment at the White House. They also underscored the degree to which Trump remains fixated on his grievances over the Russia probe, and often on obscure aspects of that investigation that are unintelligible to all but its most careful followers.
Since late Tuesday, Trump has vowed to declassify all documents he claims will show improper activity by Obama and his intelligence advisers — before quickly reversing himself and suggesting he had already done so “long ago” — and repeatedly cited Russian intelligence services’ claims that Clinton “stirred up” the Trump-Russia collusion scandal that has dogged his presidency.
The Trump administration has never held a firm position on whether the president’s tweets constitute direct orders; various tell-all books have described how top officials learned which of his instructions — lawful or otherwise — to ignore and which to accommodate. Courts have at times treated Trump’s tweets at official statements. But on other occasions they’ve been brushed off as political banter that lacks the force of law.
Trump’s Twitter feed tends to be a realtime barometer of his offline moods and whims, however — and themes he hits on repeatedly over 280 characters tend to surface in conversations he holds in private.
A Justice Department spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment about whether Trump had ever directly asked Barr to order the arrest of his rivals or if his tweet suggesting as much had veered into territory that Barr once said made his job “impossible.”
In past interviews, Barr has signaled that he has no intention of prosecuting senior Obama administration officials, though he has cast doubt on the motives behind the Russia probe and launched an investigation into its origins.
The review Barr ordered has disappointed Trump in recent weeks as the U.S. attorney tapped to lead it, John Durham, has signaled he might not pursue the kinds of high-profile prosecutions the president and his allies are demanding. Durham’s deputy in the review, veteran Justice Department prosecutor Nora Dennehy, recently quit the faltering effort and returned to the private sector.
“NOW THAT THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS GOT COUGHT [sic] COLD IN THE (NON) FRIENDLY TRANSFER OF GOVERNMENT, IN FACT, THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN AND WENT FOR A COUP, WE ARE ENTITLED TO ASK THE VOTERS FOR FOUR MORE YEARS,” Trump declared late Wednesday morning. “PLEASE REMEMBER THIS WHEN YOU VOTE!”
Trump’s tweet barrage was particularly jarring when set against the political backdrop. Biden has widened his lead over Trump in recent polls, as the president’s support has eroded among women, seniors and other voting blocs that helps him scratch out a victory in 2016. Trump flummoxed his allies Tuesday by summarily shutting down — also via Twitter — negotiations over a coronavirus stimulus bill, only to backtrack hours later by calling on Congress to pass more targeted measures.
But Trump has made clear that he remains focused on punishing perceived enemies regardless of the political cost. While recovering at Walter Reed Monday morning, his chief of staff Mark Meadows told Fox News that Trump had kept busy that morning in part by directing the declassification of documents related to the Russia probe — a set of files he claimed were conclusive proof that Clinton had concocted the notion that his campaign team had ties to Russia even though the Senate Intelligence Committee and the special counsel’s team had rejected the allegations as unverified.
In releasing them, Trump’s own hand-picked intel chief, John Ratcliffe, acknowledged the documents, sourced to Russian intelligence, might have been “exaggerated” or even “fabricated” to deflect from their culpability in the election interference effort.
© 2020 POLITICO LLC
So you think that any evidence of criminal and even treasonous activity of one political party should remain hidden from the people until that party wins the election? And since it would certainly be hidden after they won, you are in favor of hiding evidence from the people because it exposes one party of treason. Yet you get all upset for not being able to peek into the other party’s tax returns.
So you favor the US being controlled by known criminals. Interesting outlook. I think they call that sociopathic.
[/quote
I was thinking immaturity as an underdeveloped personality, and You bring up a good point-hos that relates to social pathology.
But to equivocate the developmental overlap between parties and those who represent them, is to commit a fallacious reasoning of trying to fill holes to find what went wrong in a nominal process.
Bias begets all kinds of badfellows, and this is a. quid-pro-po of the current situation, where bias is all consuming.
It includes more then what may be implied. Lets not then nump to such things as relationships showing affinity to underground mob connections, for instance
The 'mob, nowedays, are as clean as any virtuous man, for instance.
It is hard to find generic specimens from many generations removed from the dark days of turf warfare
You cannot make America great again, returning to an unbridled social mix.
But do not get me wrong, I get YOU. about the swamp being so deeply mired in ‘National Security’ , that it boggles the mind.
It is other people, like Sartre said, that make life on earth hell…
The ideal stage is running out , the characters searching for Authors constituting relatively congruently believable values diminished to an unbearable show of insecurity among characters.
The plot has become so thick with soap opera drama that the state of the progress of said play, has become overly routine and familier :It’s Their fault . Just vote for the most familiar guy who can evoke sweet nonsense.
Then things will eventually turn out. With AI and high tech leading the way.( If HE ultimately turns out to become benevolent)
Curtain falls among -, thundering claps.
The question was - do you favor hiding the evidence that would either convict or exculpate those suspected?
There are two parties involved.
[*] One party has already been proven to have been involved in espionage and treason but there is more evidence being hidden.
[*] The other party is suspected of perhaps owing money to someone.
All of the Marxist media that you read and promote favor hiding the treason and keeping the people focused on the owing of money. The media obviously favors the hiding of evidence. I am asking if you also favor hiding the evidence. And then of course - Why?
A guy by the name of Robert Broke suggested :
"The rise of modern liberalism , which stresses the dual forced of radical egaliterianism(the equality of outcomes rather then opportunities) and radical individualism ( the drastic reduction of limits to personal gratification.)
The roots of modern liberalism are deeply embedded in the past two and a half centuries - and perhaps -arise from the very nature of Western civilization itself."
The holes created by liberalism into conventional wisdom may be hidden not by individual intent, but by the lapse of memory set in in accordance to social process.
That is the only objection I have to Your description of what’s happening. .
So you refuse to answer the question?
That is a part of the Marxist strategy of distraction.
And the question was :
"The question was - do you favor hiding the evidence that would either convict or exculpate those suspected?
There are two parties involved.
[*] One party has already been proven to have been involved in espionage and treason but there is more evidence being hidden.
[*] The other party is suspected of perhaps owing money to someone.-------"
well it’s not an either-or situation, you can own taxes and you can hide that for the source of the indebtedness
That may just be as bad as hiding other intelligence matters. That is what I mean by a conflation of sources -(outcomes and their opportunities) they bleed into each other so they cannot be expunged or validated
They stand as facts, covered by lingo few but political 'experts ’ understand.