.
I couldn’t care less, bro! 
1 Like
.
But why does the truth -that certain demographics bring certain problems with them wherever they go- enrage the Left/Libs?
.
¿Whatever happened to protecting the People?
Instead, people are going missing on a daily basis and our governments doesn’t give a sh*t.
Exactly right. These are the same people who chant “black lives matter!” and riot in the street when one black criminal is killed by the police, meanwhile thousands of innocent non-criminal black people including children are killed every year by black criminals and no one bats an eye.
They really do not care about human life, they are narcissists and high on dark triad traits. What they care about is 1) conformity, 2) power and money for themselves, 3) wanting to appear ‘good’ according to dominant leftist ideals so they can hopefully go viral or achieve some new status for themselves, and 4) allowing their emotions and inner feelings to be free in riotous actions because they are basically animals and it feels good for them to act like it.
Imagine the response to perceiving social injustice goes like, “Let’s burn our own neighborhoods and businesses down!”
Because yeah. Low IQ is like that.
1 Like
Ever look up the rap sheet of George FLoyd? All the crimes he was convicted of, including breaking into a home and pointing a gun at a pregnant woman’s stomach. Oh yes, he is a true hero of the people. Well he is, of those same kind of people at least.
If black lives really mattered then black people would have been happy George Floyd died, because it would mean he could never threaten and harm any other black people again.
1 Like
.
So basically they just don’t give a sh*t, because certain demographics aren’t part of their ‘great plan’ of whatever crap their plan keeps morphing into.
Poor [good] humans and humanity and the lives lost, in this global insanity of a giant insane-asylum.
.
One would think so, wouldn’t One… 
.
This…
guy was almost made into a martyr… until his rap sheet was revealed, and now silence from his family and the UK government after creating made-up noise about his ‘saintly’-self and demonising the Officer who was doing his job.
Back to Trump, while I don’t trust him and I think he already betrayed his base and his promises, and I think his supporters are pretty dumb for not noticing or caring about that, I do respect Trump supporters because of the ideals they are holding onto. They have generally good intentions and ideals, the problem is they put their hope in a charlatan. If only Trump were legit and not a gaslight, then all the supporters would be quite justified and in the right, at least on most issues. Of course they go too far in some areas like with legal immigration and many go into actual racism which is stupid. But a decent approach and intention can be forgiven a few excesses and errors, as long as those are kept in check.
I agree with the whole “no one is perfect, pick the lesser of two evils” thing as applied to politics but only if there is an actual choice, actual humans representing other humans. That is no longer the case, all the politicians are bought and paid for slaves to the same uniparty system of plutocratic globalized technocracy and that isn’t going to change any time soon. I see Trump as the face of a strong and mostly good value-set for America, however he is really the wolf in sheep’s clothing. He is there to tell people what they want to hear while setting them up for destruction. Which he already did in 2020 and is going to do again very soon if he is selected next week.
Since this topic is about Trump why not get into some of the details…
He let Hillary go with no investigation
He didn’t charge or arrest any deep state swamp creatures
He added more debt than even Obama
He did operation warpspeed resulting in the death of a million Americans at least
He did nothing to stop online or media censorship and ‘fake news’
Despite acting like he hates the media and news press he talked to them all the time, continued to invite them into the white house and on airforce one
Under Trump, ISPs began recording everything you do online and selling that as data to anyone who wants it (advertisers, governments)
Trump led his supporters into a fed trap on J6 and then did nothing to stop it, just walked away
He did nothing to stop the stolen election and literal COUP against the people even though he had tools at his disposal to use within legal means (using the national guard to do forced recounts to expose corrupt election practices, releasing data from CIA/NSA sites that monitored in real time the rigging of the voting machines, basically doing a massive declassify of everything they had, invoking the Insurrection Act)
Didnt actually do anything to reduce the size of government or the burden of taxation on the people
But despite all that, sure, he did some good things too. And he is certainly preferrable to the alternatives. But that’s like saying this shit sandwich over here is slightly less disgusting to eat than the shit sandwich over there. It’s a setup false dichotomy that traps everyone on one side or the other, so the agenda can continue and the whole system can maintain its appearance of legitimacy as long as a hundred million people keep voting for it.
Keep that in mind… you are not just voting for a candidate, you are voting for the system itself. Trump voters generally know the election was rigged but they are still going to choose to participate in that same rigged voting system again? To me that is just insane.
Yep. When their agenda backfires on them they never apologize or correct course, they just censor and pretend it never happened.
They have the ethics and integrity of a cockroach.
But not voting is a bigger mistake than voting, in a two-Party system, unless the entire electorate agree to vote for a third Party… which would take some doing, to achieve.
.
No apology… because their scapegoat-martyr plan didn’t come to fruition.
…also, no shame… despite all the incriminating evidence coming to light. How embarrassing for them.
Course how essentially let this happen, to have come to this?
The idea of unity is perceived as above color and race and orientation, it’s meaning alluded the left, the new left thought of it as an eternal balm, once dipped into itz’s fountain of youth, it would guarantee the eternally lit objects to shine on for ever. But such can only be realized by methodic pressure to adhere
Well I believe it is really a one party system, not two. The “two parties” are a false dichotomy, they may disagree on certain issues that do matter however deeper down they are all united toward their common goals and agendas. The “sides” are even encouraged to fight each other for power and influence, this keeps the whole thing looking legitimate and encourages a survival of the fittest mentality amongst those in the corrupt inner circles of globalized power structures.
Let me ask you a different question: in America there are, maybe 200 million eligible voters, something like that. Usually about 100 million people vote, roughly half of those who can. Maybe its a bit more or less, doesn’t matter. Imagine this: what if only 5 or 6 million people voted? A reduction of over 10x, so barely 3% of the eligible population was actually interested in voting? Or maybe even 10%, still a very small number. What would that TELL you, what would it mean? It would mean the people are rejecting the system and the system ITSELF would lose legitimacy.
That is what I want to see. Enough people waking up to the fake corrupt nature of the sham system and opting out. Choosing not to vote not out of apathy or disinterest but out of a higher interest and political valuation, to show that the system does not earn their support.
@Magsj Another Idea you may like and which I heard from a podcaster I like: imagine if we started a new political party centered around Christian ethics and worldview. Call it whatever name we want, maybe it can have slightly different names and iterations in different countries. But the whole point of the party is that Christians who see the sin and immorality and corrupt satanic nature of the current political systems and powers would have a place to cast their vote outside of that evil system.
It might not earn enough votes to elect anyone, but who cares. It would grow. As it becomes more and more obvious how and why the system we have is failing and collapsing into its own evil irrational abyss, people will be waking up and need someplace else to put their political support. As Christians we already understand the world is fallen, man’s nature is one of sin and the world has always been the world. We are not put here to redeem it (or to judge it); redemption was Christ’s gift, and judgment is God’s promise and plan.
The world itself is seen as an evil thing from the Christian view, a view that Trump pretends to align with (but really doesn’t) and which most of his supporters also claim to align with. Well? Why are they trying to save the world, to create some kind of “Christian Nationalism” on planet earth? They want to pre-empt the Kingdom of God? Lol. They aim too high, they blaspheme against their own ideals.
Better to go back and read what Christ said about the nature of the world, and what our role ought to be within it. Now granted, that being said, I completely understand we are here and alive and we have families and futures and we want to try our best to make the world the best possible place it can be for us and the ones we love. That is completely fine, we should do that. But there is a limit, a point at which we must realize the world’s inherent fallen nature and the impossibility of our redeeming it especially through something so crude as politics.
Speaking in secular terms even about something like feminism/communism/DEI woke transgender weirdness and all that stuff entails, those are primarily CULTURAL problems (with roots in biological dysfunction) and we aren’t going to solve cultural problems through politics. Making laws saying DEI or affirmative action or abortion are illegal isn’t going to shift the culture, it might forestall things for a year or two in certain areas. Where those laws would be effective are places where the culture already and still aligns with those values; imagine the federal government via Trump trying to enforce legislation like that, it would only cause a firestorm and feed the other side plenty of energy and ammunition. Although that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t love to see such laws passed.
Culture is not shifted by politics, it is shifted by… culture itself, which means ideas and entertainment and historical perceptions and also it means technology and trends emerging from tech. Culture is a complex energetic structure and is subject to entropy when not properly cared for, we are witnessing that all around us. Communism itself as originally created and pushed into Russia for example is literally a death stroke delivered at the level of culture and psychology and works via a clever mechanism of releasing massive amounts of entropy into the interiorities of the system’s foundational bases including the human heart and our interpersonal relating. Communism is a death strike and was designed to be precisely that, made for that purpose by very smart and very evil people who wanted to see the progressive downfall of western societies making them weaker and easier to control. Of course the system works even better in non-western places. After all it was designed to cripple the west, which stands so much higher than the rest of the world. If it can harm the west then it can certainly work a living hell on non-western societies.
The point of all this is simply to put a check on our expectations of solving these problems by creating new laws and electing new political leaders. It just doesn’t work like that. Politics is downstream from cutlure, far downstream from it. And culture itself is actually downstream from technology, which is one reason I focus so much on the tech/development side of things. Not only communism but technological progress itself is actually an entropic release mechanism, as others have written about. The left-learning “progressive” direction of history is not a result of some kind of moral inevitability or intellectual realization but is a consequence of technological development and goes and in hand with that. Why? Well that would be an interesting subject to get into but off topic for this thread.
Epstein claims he was trump’s closest friend
Epstein painted a complicated portrait of Trump. He called him “charming,” and “always fun,” capable of extraordinary salesmanship and suggested he was personally in favor of Trump’s policies on “the transgender stuff.” But he alleged Trump was a serial cheat in his marriages and loved to “f— the wives of his best friends.”
He also claimed that while Trump has friends, he was at heart a friendless man incapable of kindness.
On the tape Epstein can be heard saying, “He’s a horrible human being. He does nasty things to his best friends, best friends’ wives, anyone who he first tries to gain their trust and uses it to do bad things to them.”
Sorry to interrupt here, I just am compelled to fit a politically strategic thinking as far as that goes:
()()
November 3, 2024 10:08 AM UTC
Hungary’s Orban says Trump victory would force Europe to rethink support for Ukraine
Europe will need to rethink its support of Ukraine if Donald Trump is elected president of the United States, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Sunday, as the continent “will not be able to bear the burdens of the war alone”.
Orban opposes military aid to Ukraine and has made clear he thinks Trump shares his views and would negotiate a peace settlement for Ukraine.
He backs former president Trump, the Republic candidate, to beat Democratic candidate Kamala Harris in Tuesday’s U.S. election.
“We (in Europe) need to realize that if there will be a pro-peace president in America, which I not only believe in but I also read the numbers that way, … if what we expect happens and America becomes pro-peace, then Europe cannot remain pro-war,” Orban said.
Ukraine will be high on the agenda when European leaders meet in Budapest in the coming week, he said, referring to a European Political Community meeting and a more informal meeting of EU leaders due to take place.
“Europe cannot bear the burden of [the war] alone, and if Americans switch to peace, then we also need to adapt, and this is what we will discuss in Budapest,” Orban said.
Europe is jittery about how the outcome of the U.S. election will affect the war in Ukraine and the continent’s security.
Orban has angered Brussels with his close ties to Russia and opposition to aid for Ukraine.
Hungary’s foreign minister Peter Szijjarto said in July that the Hungarian government sees Trump as a “chance for peace” in Ukraine.
In July Orban said his team was assisting Trump’s aides with policies on families and migration. On Thursday, he called Trump to wish him good luck ahead of Tuesday’s election.
Reporting by Anita Komuves; Editing by Susan Fenton
MSM = fake news
In Europe, we have a clear tendency it appears:
1 Like
True , I wonder why it is? I read somewhere that even though various splits regarding the Gaza massacre, a neutral objector, has stated publicly that he has changed his mind on who to vote for, despite Trumps preference for like minded people who are globally perceived as authoritarian , because even if multicultural aka Democracy will suffer a set back,as a result of a Harris loss, the greater peace can trump the one so elusive in the Muddle East, regardless of causes and distant or proximal effects.
The reflective action-reaction is blind to effects that are genetically linked- that have little relation between memetic-genetic differences in a familiar-familial context, which bears no semblance to rapidly changing spatial-temporal advances fro WW2 and reduced to far earlier mythological intuited prophesies.
)(
)()(
If, this make sense to any kind of subliminal or or ordinary perception , then it would surprise a whole lot of eligible voters, who actually can perceive in-between the lines, or who are blocked by them through no fault of their own.
))()((
Cause celebre- through no fault of their own