Part of me, Humean, sees you as looking out for me.
And how could I not love you for that?
well, you might love Humean for other reasons, but perhaps not because of the above. His “looking out” for you as you say, what are you learning from it? It gives you the excuse to hold him partly responsible for your behavior here on Mondays and Tuesdays in that he hasn’t banned you on those days.
Your behavior is NOT his responsibility. Your behavior is totally your responsibility. Perhaps he is simply trying to get you to finally see this for yourself. His only responsibility lies within his response to your behavior and how he chooses to respond to that. Ultimately though you are an adult and a man. Suck it up and stay out of here on Mondays and Tuesdays. 
Will it!!! It begins and ends with you. 
You’ve proved here that truth and reality are sometimes based on nothing more than plain old erroneous subjective perception.
I’m playing with you, you know. Are my perceptions valid? I think so.
Arcturus: The truth to a singular reality is no longer in the private domain. We have been coerced into the public domain, the best interpretation we are able to peg unto so called truths, are those of duplicity and bad faith. Most justify that by a direct reference to authorities responsible for those domains. The individual choice to see truth in it’s truest light, is to have accusations of psychological devolvement splashed in our face. And i ask You: Who would want to become a psychological prisoner to ideas awash in a politically trendy nostalgia? I would rather stay within natural and innate boundaries.
Hi obe,
I love how you call me Arcturus and not arc . People are always shortening meaninful names. Anyway, what is the bottom line here?
ok hi arc. bottom line? it’s still n either/or; it’s either a discovery via intuitive, tacit knowedge, when You posted You caught me off guard, so i had to prioritize answering You, or finding an affinity between the words ‘tacit’ and ‘tactical’. The sound so much alike, that there must be some. However, that’s for later. The other bottom line, is not really a linear at all, it is voluminous, and nietzchean, it is the abyss gazing back unto me,or as he epic orchestral sweet, unanswered question seem to surround it with an odour of a burnt offerings. I think it was Charles
Ives. I am beginning to be spooked by it, it feels almost autistic,. But it probably isn’t, most likely it is artistic, or hermetic,hermeneutic. On another note, fear plays into it, and Alice may fall into the hole, but tiny Alice sort of has a grasp, so it lessens the dread.
To complete Alice, then, there is Alice B Tokley.
117, I apologize: I wandered into the wrong room in the wrong state of mind and tried to comment on something I was not equipped to respond to: the analytic approach to exposition. This only led to overcompensation through what resulted in nonsense.