Universal Basic Income (UBI)

The ‘disconnected youth’ movement is growing as more Gen Zers struggle to find purpose at school and work

Regrettably, my concern with regard the impact of AI on youth was never addressed in this topic.

What is your opinion on the “Disconnected Youth” movement in light of the emergence of AI?

I just started another topic that reveals the intellectual techno-eugenic foundation of Google’s leadership (founders, CEO and management circle) and their fundamental and active (strategically) protected idea that the human species is to be rendered sub-par to AI, and that humanity is to be replaced with AI.

This was revealed by Elon Musk who recently published the intellectual origin of his breakup with Google more generally.

The Google founder became angry because Musk argued in defence of humanity. The Google founder said that it was unjust to defend the human species in the face of superior new AI species.

The intellectual disagreement caused a broader breakup with Google as a company, with several Google-Musk related incidents since the Google co-founder related breakup. These subsequent incidents were all fundamentally based on ‘anger from the perspective of Google towards Musk’, for example 'stealing an AI employee by Musk, angrily portrayed by Google’s leadership as ‘betrayal’ and cause for anger and retaliation against Musk.

This insight reveals something more profound from the perspective of youth. Youth does not just read such info and judge accordingly, but they feel and experience their position in humanity relative to a future that is to be considered significantly impacted by corporations such as Google and its controlling leadership.

Google has been accused of a “employee hoarding scheme”, adding over 100,000 employees in just a few years time shortly before its mass AI layoffs of a similar amount. Employees complained of ‘fake jobs’:

From the perspective of HumAnIze these might be considered mere corporate corruption incidents. From the perspective of youth however, they are ‘getting the message’ already, while in their prime development phase and cradle of ‘potential’, that they are not valued today, and will increasingly less so in the future.

Shouldn’t the situation of these children be given due attention by philosophy? Who else than philosophers are able to make a difference when it concerns an intellectual defence of their purpose of existence?