Then that sounds like a different game altogether..
How can I trust you when I can’t quote you? I replaced ‘if’ by ‘when’ for one it could demean you, meaning we are cross referencing
Or other innumerable reasons crying to seventh heaven
But then if you inverse that you get not how why because the field becomes wide open
Huh? How can eye ( points to his eye) have said that? It’s so phenomenal.
I think you might be taking me too seriously. I often try to be funny, but I’m just not very good at it, but hey ho, practice makes perfect. Don’t worry about demeaning me, I do it to myself all the time and I am now thoroughly demeaned to ground level.
1 Like
Oh the classic Scottish wit. Admirable but.. watch the gin I drink the tonic with a twist of it,
I used to drink the vodka, but the only twist was the screw cap when opening it.
1 Like
The only reason I offered this black humor was recently saw Virginia wolf , in a dream within , a drea, and thought of oh my! Richard Burton’s engagement the last great drama since Machbbat.
Do you believe in the variety of dreams?
The only improvement l would make to chess is: Free Fire. No waiting. Each player moves at will. It would be more like real life this way. [Edit: I think someone on here first mentioned that]
A third party would be needed to ensure all moves are legal, because the moves may be unfolding quite fast.
I’m middle of the road. If anyone wants to take me on: Send location. Lichess?
I don’t know. A lot of my dreams used to be the same, I was either in some sort of busy factory but just getting in the way, or a weird hotel with stairs and exits to places that didn’t go anywhere, or spaces that were too small to crawl into.
Then I just stopped dreaming, as far as I’m aware, I can’t remember the last time I did. It feels like many months ago.
Did you ever have a dream that was merely auditory with absolutely no visible pictures, and the dream conveyed unheard of information to the best of your recollection, & later, maybe only a decade later could you string together multi layered differing sources apparently unrelated?
In various contextual realms did these sources become revealed? To boot.
The only thing like that I remember was when I was a teenager, I woke very early and heard someone whistling outside. It was a weird tune, and it kept getting louder. Then it stopped suddenly and I was glad of that. But then I couldn’t move. I went into a total panic, I was literally paralysed, but then I broke out of it and remember the relief I felt.
I’ve since read about sleep paralysis, so it was likely that, but thinking about the whistling thing still gives me the shivers.
But there was nothing revealed in the way you describe. Have you experienced that?
Yes but it was different in the sense that the voice was subdued and supposedly meaningful, it had an object, a name attached and did not carry a tune, supposedly a whistle carries a pitch. Of course it may have carried a pitch supposing that the focus was searching for relevance, meaning, and the inquiry that it was heard in a different context(s).
That was after a rich influx of strange, conscious events appeared, and only did later was the effort to tie them together was made.
It was during a lapse of many a decade prior to hearing of internet philosophy .
Did you manage to make sense out of those events tied together?
I’ve had strange conscious events too.
Yes , but not while they took place, or while they were happening. Now it appears somehow different,
I just remember the idea of them now, but the significance is always there, even though the original memories are hazy. Something was being explained in terms so simple, that I just couldn’t wrap my head around it. Does that make any sense?
Of course. Some things are just too simple to be simple. That evokes doubt as far ( or near as you put it) as the intention of pronouncing it in those terms and tone.
As ear (or near ) for that matter determines the immediacy or aloofness of such pronouncements, to enable to map the boundary situation between interpretation /analysis.
To appreciate the individual connection with the masses thus linked. (( For fear of the hunter becoming the hunted)
So that he may not be haunted with the doubt of indeterminacy.
Course the question arises as to the nature of the hunt, is it a good or a bad spirit? Can tell? Judge it by its effects and not how it affects tha mass, cause it might panic-hysteria.
It can be proof of a regressive amalgam, that is as rock solid as it can Turn the illusion into mass hallucination.
And that is the fact: Mass can not detect this subtle regressive rationale between the hypothesis and the held premise, they just go with it, thinking they / him is an invisible but solid ethereal link.
Is it? As solid as retaining to the more the better argument?
Anyone may not think so as long as they are not one of them.
Which the are.
Which brings it back to the collapsing wave proof, or the cascade.
.
Isn’t what you describe^, a different game altogether?
Idk. I’m a gamer and I was a fan of chess when I was a kid but as an adult it feels too rigid. It just feels like trading pieces for pieces, and not able to mount an offensive.
I notice people often overrate flawed games, for instance XCOM2 is highly overrated and has more flaws in it than chess does.
Chess is rigid and boring until you get to around 1800 level online. That’s when it starts to get very interesting. You can mount some complex and fun offensives once you know what you’re doing.
I heard a GM say most people do not play chess, they play what could be called “take and retake”. They capture pieces and think that is playing chess, but really that isn’t chess at all. Not easy to see until you get into the top 10% or less of all players.
1 Like