bro i am surrounded by spirits all the time i knew about them before you did
My good friend Ethan, offered an argument for meat eating.
Basically, if people didn’t eat beef, there would be no cows.
And also, cows die some day anyways, even if you don’t
butcher them. They would have a longer life if they
were not used for meat, but if there was no demand for beef,
they would not exist. Everything we eat used to be alive.My own vegetarianism argument is that we can minimize
how much death we cause by eating plants only.I feel like i don’t have a strong argument for vegetarianism.
Can anyone help me?
No, you cannot minimise death in any sense.
The only way you can limit death is by limiting life, because death is the enevitable end of life and there is no life without death.
Why do you want to limit death?
Surely limiting suffering is more important?
I am here to tell you that because of the existence of the meat industry animal suffering is less. Nature only offers unpleasant injury, disease or predation. Most animals in the wild die of being torn apart limb from limb by other animals; others sucumb to the slow tortue of disease leading to death, some die from lack of food, which is a very painful death, and others die from inuries which make it impossible for them to forage.
Animals kept by farmers get health care, shelter, protection from predation and a continual supply of food. When they die they are killed instantly and painlesslessly.
Animals also provide great benefits to the ecosystem. Animals have always been a part of nature, and they process vegetable matter into meat and manure which fertilises the soil. Pastures are the home to a great diversity of plant species and that provide many other wild animals with food from birds to insects, including BEES. Remiving animals from that system to replace them with food crops usually means deep ploughing, monoculture and lose of species diversity, and soil erosion leading to a dependancy on chemical fertiliser, persticides and herbicides.
Meat provides 100% of the nutrients required by humans to live, lacking only in vitamin C which can be easily got from leavy vegetables, fruits or even milk. It is in the most easily available form to digest.
No, you cannot minimise death in any sense.
The only way you can limit death is by limiting life, because death is the enevitable end of life and there is no life without death.
Why do you want to limit death?
Surely limiting suffering is more important?
I am here to tell you that because of the existence of the meat industry animal suffering is less. Nature only offers unpleasant injury, disease or predation. Most animals in the wild die of being torn apart limb from limb by other animals; others sucumb to the slow tortue of disease leading to death, some die from lack of food, which is a very painful death, and others die from inuries which make it impossible for them to forage.
Animals kept by farmers get health care, shelter, protection from predation and a continual supply of food. When they die they are killed instantly and painlesslessly.Animals also provide great benefits to the ecosystem. Animals have always been a part of nature, and they process vegetable matter into meat and manure which fertilises the soil. Pastures are the home to a great diversity of plant species and that provide many other wild animals with food from birds to insects, including BEES. Remiving animals from that system to replace them with food crops usually means deep ploughing, monoculture and lose of species diversity, and soil erosion leading to a dependancy on chemical fertiliser, persticides and herbicides.
Meat provides 100% of the nutrients required by humans to live, lacking only in vitamin C which can be easily got from leavy vegetables, fruits or even milk. It is in the most easily available form to digest.
Thank you.
I will consider your words.
From the recently leaked IPCC report on climate change:
Eating patterns in many parts of the rich world will also need to change. “A shift to diets with a higher share of plant-based protein in regions with excess consumption of calories and animal-source food can lead to substantial reductions in [greenhouse gas] emissions, while also providing health benefits … Plant-based diets can reduce emissions by up to 50% compared to the average emission intensive western diet,” the report says.
If you need a better reason to quit eating meat than that, I can’t imagine what it could be.