I answered your 3 questions. Did you miss that as well?
Seriously, you have deteriorated in your comprehending ability since you wrote under “iwannaplato”.
But, you I see your focusing on “the other” has increased. I see you still prefer to try to attack “the person”, rather than concentrate on what is actually being said and meant, “iwannaplato”.
Your inability to still not yet recognise that your own definition for the “evidence” word is still DIFFERENT from mine, shows your comprehension skill is still very low and inadequate. That you are also missing reading all the words I use, and just “cherry pick” some words of mine is why you can only see “poor logic” on my part.
But, while you are only looking at “my poorness”, you miss out learning what I actually mean. You also miss noticing what you lack here. See, if you do not spend the time to understand “another”, then you will never obtain understanding, itself.
Because there is no contradiction.
You are the dude who opened on the concept like “wtf do you mean im not god and i do not know the entirety of reality for what it is and understand all?”
If you wanna talk about speaking volumes start with your disposition and the idea that you are omniscient.
Its almost like there is your truth and my truth, isnt it?
I reiterate: You are trying to debate me on a statement that essentially comes down to “your impression of reality and reality itself do not necessarily overlap”.
To disagree with that means you either dont understand what has been said, or you have a level of hubris that is irrational. As a complimentary third option: You are trolling.
Not relevant to what I wrote. You were incorrect in your use of ‘finally’. And you treated questions as evidence of being in a cult. I thought you could at least read, but it seems the deterioration is very severe.
You mean I did what you did here? LOL. You simply cannot see your hypocrisy.
I’m so sorry that I used the English definition at the time this is being written. If I traveled to Rome I wouldn’t this other people have a problem when I make up random meanings for words in Italian. LOL.
It would have been very easy to admit you made mistakes, but you can’t because you are a fault finding program, which resembles, guess what, the tactics of cult leaders.
Note: What anew cannot do is show the logic in what he is doing, so he attacks the other person, based on his own beliefs.
I never denied I was in a cult, moron. 2) Now, I will: I’m not in a cult 3) you think you are not in a cult. So, you are in a cult.
Seriously, I think Age actually had a better grasp of logic and communication. Do you have a psychiatrist or neurologist? I think you should show that person your communication here and get a broad evaluation.
Notice what you did not have the courage to respond to: you were wrong. It was Atla who referred to you as female.
I believe once in a great while Age could manage to apologize for or admit mistakes. I mean, not just for things like spelling mistakes. Rare, but possible.
It seems you are deeper in your cult of one than before, since you cannot admit to such an obvious error.
Again, please seek professional help.
The reason why you keep making mistakes and haven’t yet found the final answers is because of the way you speak and because of the words you use,
And note how little interest he has in moving the discussion forward. Where a good communicator would explain what your misinterpretation was, anew1 wants you to produce more text, so he can criticize you for your assumptions. @Nausamedu
And what people who are not in cults do. They deny it.
You added ‘blindly’ because it suits your purposes.
You’re like an interrogator in a tyranny (or in a Kafka novel).
Interrogator: You robbed that bank.
Prisoner: I did not.
Interrogator: Exactly, criminals deny they committed crimes. You have just demonstrated you robbed the bank.
Duh.
And even if in a particular case you got lucky and your idiotic ‘logic’ led to a correct conclusion about 1 person, what a hamfisted way to talk to them.
Are you so unaware of human psychology that this is how you approach them?
Your approach is toxic, in addition to being filled with fallacies.
The reason why you keep making mistakes and haven’t yet found the final answers is because of the way you speak and because of the words you use,
You don’t understand the meaning of condescending if you think that indicates that. But you are quite right. I do put you on ignore, and then go and open up the hidden replies, when I see that you are posting in certain topics. Yes, ambivalence is present in me. One part of me has experienced you as so tiresome that I decide to nip it in the bud. There is another part of me that sees you in another forum and would like to challenge what has ended up being a kind of viral toxicity on your part. Adding to this second urge is the fact that actually you are so much easier to deal with.
Why are you easier to deal with? Well, of course my comparing you to what you were like when you are Age is rhetorical in a certain sense. But it is an honest evaluation. You seem even less hinged, less able to mount even the slightest stickiness or reasonable patches of argument.
This may be in part because I see your games (even if they are not conscious on your part, they are games) more easily, but I do think there has been deterioration.
Where this ambivalence will go I am not sure, but we will both most certainly see.
Since “greenfuse” claims that I am on ignore, if anyone else would like to be made aware of some of the many mistakes “greenfuse” makes here, then I will share them with you.
Again, you seem not to understand humans or yourself. ‘they would just stop’ is where your lack of knowledge comes in. And of course you assume that you only criticize wrong assumptions.
But more importantly, you miss the point. The way you interact is such that you end up playing a certain role in relation to others. And that role is toxic.
That can also be a useful tool.
Note: it is as if you are responding to what I wrote about moving a discussion forward. You presented another way of moving things forward, as if this was a response to what I said. The fact is one can do both and you, in the post I was reacting to, did neither.
What you inferred from my words does not mean that is what I implied or meant.
In fact, you didn’t even manage to say it wasn’t what you meant. You couldn’t even give that minimal bit of information to move the discussion forward. You could have said ‘What you inferred from my words, was not what I meant.’ That at least gives a minimal bit of information. More useful would be to then clarify in a new wording.
But those ‘discussing with integrity’ type posts clearly do not fit in with your goals.
And this is typical also. You find something to hold onto, rather than dealing with most of what is written. You can’t admit that you confused me and Atla. Even though on some level you know that to do so fits your own sense of good communication. You cannot admit the logical fallacies you make.
Me, I can admit, I have ambivalence in relation to you. Yes, I have contradicted myself as far as having you on ignore. And for the reasons I admitted in another post.
I can make mistakes or think I want to do X, but find I am also drawn to do Y more than I realized.
You seem to see honesty as some kind of perfection. So, or course you can’t admit to serious mistakes, just things like typos. Because there goes your perfection. Me, I can admit to my mistakes. I’m human, I make mistakes.
Is Atla correct? Do you see yourself as a deity? as God?
Well, actually you are on ignore in my settings, but one can look at hidden replies despite this tool. But I have owned my ambivalence and the effects of this in a couple of posts. Can you admit you confused me with Atla not once but twice so far in this forum?
Talking about integrity, from one who deceives and is being very dishonest is quite funny to observe. Your toxicity here is not helping you at all. You miss how your advice is contradictory.
Have you explained what a cult is to you and how you can know you are in a cult?
I suggest that if you focus on the thread’s topic and on the words being written in the topic, instead of focusing on trying to attack others, then you would not spread so much toxicity in this forum. But, as always, you are absolutely free to do whatever you like.