Please do not say anything that might dissuade “greenfuse” from saying and writing the way it does here.
The more it tries to “make fun” of me here, the better this works for me.
The harder it tries, the better this helps.
Of course you did not “say that” in words, but within the words that you used, this is exactly what you were claimed, and meant.
Again, as I have already showed and proved.
Did I?
If you believe I did, then link us to exactly where I asserted that we are all in a cult and denying it proves we are in a cult.
If you do not, then, again, you are really not saying anything at all here.
LOL, After all of these years you still can’t comprehend what I say and write. Although what I say and write is in the very words I use.
I have never said what you claimed here.
Again, I suggest you open up even just a little bit, and seek out and obtain clarity before you jump to conclusions. Again, that way you will not be so wrong, so often.
A typical response from one who is truly weak and a coward here.
I will get others to discredit one, before that one is even questioned and challenged. The work of a true bully, and of one who needs others, as they cannot fight their own battles.
What your intention is here, in these forums, you have already disclosed. And that that is the only game you want to play shows how insignificant and incapable you really are.
The first exchange is from earlier in the thread.
Alors, j’ai confiance que vous demanderez.
As “greenfuse” just showed, its interpretation is wrong and incorrect. And, what I said and wrote does not match what “greenfuse” has claimed.
I’m sorry that you think quoting you is bullying you. I don’t know how they will react. I am certainly not expecting them to discredit you. I am certainly not expecting them to fight you. I assume that like in ILP most will ignore you for the most part. It is some key information about you, I think, and they are free to ask you about it. Sounds like Mary Poppins will ask you about it or something else.
Great point “mary-poppins”.
But I never ever thought that.
Once again this one has let its own presumptions and beliefs to have control over what it concludes, and then further believes is absolutely true.
A very vicious cycle “greenfuse” lives in. Again, I suggest that you open up, even just the tinniest weeniest bit.
Great. I’m glad.
That hasn’t stopped you from trying to get them to react in a particular way.
Great. What are you expecting them to do, with the way you are writing here?
From the way you write, you are surely not expecting them to work with me, right?
Are we not in ILP here?
Again, when people assume things, then this effects the way that they then look at and see things. Confirmation biases is what it is also known by.
LOL “key information”.
LOL This one actually believes that passing on its own very wrong and distorted interpretations and beliefs is “key information”.
Just like those who were passing on “key information” when they were trying to ridicule and discredit the one who was just asserting, and showing, how it is actually the earth that revolves around the sun, and not the other way around.
People’s pre-existing beliefs and presumptions can let them down, absolutely.
you expecting them to do, with the way you are writing here?
LOL
LOL Even the point “mary-poppins” was making you have somehow missed, completely.
Again, I suggest you remain open, instead of being so closed.
So, why did you believe I did, and/or try to make out I did?
You’re wrong again. People will react in different ways to you. I know that. It happened at PN Most reacted negatively, that’s true. But not all. I have presented, as I said, what I think is key information about you. They will do with that what they will.
I will present just quotes from you from here on out.
I didn’t miss his point. You missed mine in my response. You used to tend to being a bit literalist. Perhaps that happened here.
I never made that claim nor thought that way so how could I be wrong here?
Hopefully, you actually do do this.
Okay. So you didn’t miss the point. And, it was I who missed the point in your response.
Again, you speak and write as though you are God and have knowledge of the internal thinking within others.
anew1: All of you here are in a cult, but since none of you even recognise which cult that is, you do not even realise that you are in a cult.
anew1 writing as Age in Philosophy Now Forum
Once more, the word, ‘you’, means or refers to ‘an other’.
‘I’ am ‘It’. Which is why ‘you’ human beings have taken so, so long to ‘catch up’, ‘see’, ‘notice’, ‘recognize’, and ‘know’ thy ‘Self’, the ‘I’, in ‘the question’, ‘Who am ‘I’?’
‘I’ am ‘It’, the Universe, and, Mind, Its-Self.
While ‘you’ are ‘you’, human beings, and people.
Now, ‘I’ can call ‘you’ a ‘you’, because ‘you’, individually, are ‘an other’, and, all of ‘you’, collectively, are ‘others’. Which is what the word, ‘you’, means and/or is referring to, exactly. ‘you’ are, literally, the illusory separated, or the conceptually different ‘other/s’.
Whereas, ‘I’ am the one and only One, always unified and united One. While, ‘I’ can can ‘you’, a you, ‘you’ can not call ‘Me’ a you, because there is, literally, no other than ‘I’ the one and only Universe, and, Mind.
And, just like ‘you’ human beings are made up of a visible human body, and, an invisible person, within, so to am ‘I’ made up of the visible universal body, and, the invisible Mind, within.
Thank you for accepting that.
This exact post will be used for key information. I suppose if you say something I notice that seems key, I might add the exact quote I read to this key information.
Vous vous demanderiez.
Les filles francaises aiment la bonne grammatique.
Non, ce n’est pas vrai.
Please stop playing kindergarden level games.
I was talking up until now and YOU were the one telling me that everything i am saying is merely what i am inferring from your words.
YOU tell me what im inferring from your words. IM listening.
Please stop inferring things that I am not doing.
So, you want me to tell you what you are inferring, is this correct?
If what you are saying, from my words, is not what you were inferring from my words, then what is it exactly?
Is it a distortion of it?
I’m not talking about people that vote for a party, I’m saying people that part of a political party. Well, we can at least say that some political parties are indeed cults.
Or ‘movements’, say, see what happened to Erin Pizzey. Started the first domestic violence shelter and got expelled because she said domestic violence was mostly reciprocal (that was the anathema). Picture someone in those movements that throw tomato soup to art saying 'what if this feels correct to us but is putting people against our cause?’. Not all cults have leaders.