Well, in English the word ‘can’ can be used when discussing hypothetical situations. Me following someone or being in a cult are not situations I am in.
Then you are behaving oddly.
When “greenfuse” was “iwannaplato” it very rarely ever understand what I actually said and meant. it also spent very little to no time at all in even just trying to comprehend and understand me. it much preferred to just presume and believe it already knew what the actual truth is.
LOL with the “he”.
I will not even begin to explain all of the mistakes within the rest of what you wrote, as it would take far too long for you to ever come to comprehend and understand.
Once again you missed the point entirely, as you were too busy trying to find mistakes.
As I predicted, it really got to it.
I quoted you directly, so they can look at your own words and question you if they like or not. All good, n’est pas?
The interpretation that he likes has to be true and since he is infallible must be True and Real. If you don’t agree you have to prove his mind-reading is incorrect. I don’t think I even need to point out the cult leader style here.
Je me demanderais plutot: n’est-ce pas?
Anew1 thinks that if you deny you are in a cult this proves you are in a cult because people in cults deny they are in cults. Such is the state of his logic. That’s part of what he thinks of everyone here. Here is his sense of himself:
Once more, the word, ‘you’, means or refers to ‘an other’.
‘I’ am ‘It’. Which is why ‘you’ human beings have taken so, so long to ‘catch up’, ‘see’, ‘notice’, ‘recognize’, and ‘know’ thy ‘Self’, the ‘I’, in ‘the question’, ‘Who am ‘I’?’
‘I’ am ‘It’, the Universe, and, Mind, Its-Self.
While ‘you’ are ‘you’, human beings, and people.
Now, ‘I’ can call ‘you’ a ‘you’, because ‘you’, individually, are ‘an other’, and, all of ‘you’, collectively, are ‘others’. Which is what the word, ‘you’, means and/or is referring to, exactly. ‘you’ are, literally, the illusory separated, or the conceptually different ‘other/s’.
Whereas, ‘I’ am the one and only One, always unified and united One. While, ‘I’ can can ‘you’, a you, ‘you’ can not call ‘Me’ a you, because there is, literally, no other than ‘I’ the one and only Universe, and, Mind.
And, just like ‘you’ human beings are made up of a visible human body, and, an invisible person, within, so to am ‘I’ made up of the visible universal body, and, the invisible Mind, within.
It’s not polite to make fun.
i never said i was the Mind.
Again, I suggest you open up somewhat.
Once again it uses the “he” word.
Again, you make up your own reality. And, again you will see and believe what you want to see and believe.
Are you not trying to prove that I cannot admit things?
Do you believe this to just be absolutely true?
Is this why you ask me who I am?
Who do you believe I am, which you are, supposedly, teasing out of me?
Although I said the exact opposite, this one still says what it does.
You can tell anyone absolutely anything you like.
What the actual Truth is, exactly, is coming to light, and will be known, and understood.
Could what comes to light and becomes known not be what you currently believe is true?
Are you here suggesting that your persistent detracting in fact does actually work on me?
Are you still believing that what you perceive I am doing here is absolutely true and correct?
Could it be a possibility in that head that I am doing what I am doing for a very specific reason, which you have absolutely no idea nor clue about?
Could I be purposely appearing to others exactly what I want them to see?
Could I be doing this in a way so that what appears, to you, is different from what appears, to another? In fact, could what appears to you be different from what appears to another?
Or, are you still believing that your own personal views and perspectives are the ones everyone has and shares? After all, you still believe that the way you write, define words, and even spell, is the correct and right way. Which is absolutely hilarious to watch you still doing this, under another name and label.
To who, exactly?
To everyone, to some, or to you only?
So, previously, you claimed that you know what reality is exactly and what human nature is exactly, but now you want to claim that you know exactly what I will never admit.
Are you sure that it is not you who is trying to claim that you are God?
Okay.
Why is that all that matters, to you?
So what?
There are thousands upon thousands of words that can be used when discussing hypothetical situations.
But, any talk of hypothetical situations was only your own attempt to deflect.
What is obvious is you were, and still are, trying to deflect the conversation away from your answer.
So, you do not follow your partner/s, parent/s, boss/es, leader/s, nor absolutely anyone else at all, correct?
I didn’t say that. And here again you assert something that is not True or Real.
Anyway, anew1, you have asserted that we are all in a cult and denying it proves we are in a cult.
You have said that you are not human, not fallible, and The Mind, etc.
That’s great because these assertions are easy to find. Nothing really to discuss with you. I will quote you occasionally and others can make of your claims what they will.
Has your perception or belief ever let you down before?
Or, are your perceptions and beliefs here what are actually true and right?
anew1, you have asserted that we are all in a cult and denying it proves we are in a cult.
You have said that you are not human, not fallible, and The Mind, etc.
That’s great that these assertions are easy to find. Nothing really to discuss with you. I will quote you occasionally and others can make of your claims what they will.
No.
LOL Your interpretation, again, could not be anymore mistaken.
LOL This is another prime example of how and when this one makes a conclusion, based upon its own assumptions, without ever seeking out and obtaining clarification and understanding first.
I have never ever thought that if you deny you are in a cult, this proves you are in a cult.
This is just another example of how and when this one believes that its own personal interpretations of others writings is the one and only true and right one.