Umm… the pattern is the algorithms used to find pi… if pi had ZERO pattern, you couldn’t use an algorithm to find it. This, again shows your ignorance of mathematics.
And laso from a numerology standpoint, if you want to get superstitious about numbers… 9801 is one of the most useful numbers there is. Ramanujan’s algorithm for pi used this number, and it’s also the number used to get the least common denominator for separating numbers in decimal output that are the counting numbers, which can be used for AI applications, you know, this number: 0.12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031… etc…
This entire sequence of numbers is not related to external reality, but the fetid workings of your own mind.
There is not WHY here.
There is only the clanking and whirring of your limited perceptual qualities.
PI is irrational not because of nature, but because of the fact that maths is an inadequate way of describing the universe.
It’s irrational because of base 10. Make PI the base and the problem of description is solved.
[size=200]Begs To Differ:[/size]
Now, take this number “21469242”. Before I do anything else, what is the first number and the last number in this last segment: ““24” is “42”; “120” is “129” converging in to 3 + 9 = “12”; “216” is “36”; “408” is “498” which converges into “138” or “48”; “504” is “594” which converges into “144”; “600” is “699” which is “159” or “69”.”
“42” & “69”…
Go back to the number “21469242”. Separate it like this: |2|14|69|24|2|. Now, notice that these numbers are creating a strange sequence in the way they intimately look similar. That’s because it is a “Sequence”. Add every number except “69”, you get what? Let me hear you say it loud - “42”…
That is “42” & “69” from two vastly different sources - one of them being Pi’s code that nobody on this planet besides me could break - the other being a cycle that is hidden within “128” > “256” > “512” > “1024”.
Let’s play with these numbers with the same order of operations I have been using since the beginning…
42 + 69 = “111”. This is a “Binary Code”. 42 x 69 = “2898”, which converges into “11” and “17”, which is “1117” then “7777”.
7 x 7 + 7 x 7 = “98”, 9 x 8 = “72”.
Keep in mind that 7x7 = 4/9 Pi.
We have not 1, but “2” of them.
4/9 + 4/9 = “8/9”.
8/9 of Pi = “2.79252680319”.
The “79” converges into “16”; the “252” converges into “9”; “68”; “0319” is “9319” which converges into “128” because 9 + 3 = 12 and 1 + 9 = “10”, which is “8”.
Altogether, “1696838”; this is a “Genetic Code”.
Now what is Pi x Pi? “9.86960440109”.
The “86” converges into “14”; the “96” converges into “15”; “044” is “944”, it converges into “134”; “0109” is “9199”, it converges into “899” then “179” then “89”, 8 x 9 = “72”.
Pi = 3.1415, notice the numbers I got were “14”, “15”, “134” from numbers that look nothing like 3.1415.
Also, look at this number: "9.“869"60440109”. Remember “369”? That “8” took place of “3”, so where did that “3” go?
269 in space count = “43” > 4 x 3 = “12” > “3”.
369 in space count = “33” > 3 x 3 = “9”
"8"69 in space count = “23” > 2 x 3 = “6”
"5"69 in space count = “13” > 3 x 3 = “9”
"7"69 in space count = “13” > 3 x 3 = “9”
469 in space count = “23” > 2 x 3 = “6”
969 in space count = “33” > 3 x 3 = “9”
169 in space = “53” > 5 x 3 = “15”
The number of spaces are creating a “Sequence”. 43 + 53 = “96”; 33 + 33 = “66”; 23 + 23 = “46”; 13 + 13 = “26”.
96 > 66 > 46 > 26.
96 > 26 = “70”.
66 > 47 = “20”.
This is, again, “72”, except it’s “7020” this time. [size=200]That is “20 Full Circles” because I used “Pi x Pi”. What do I do with those “20 Full Circles”? I apply them to the Flower Of Life (L)[/size]: 
7020/360 = “19.5”.
360 x 20 = “7200”, which is “7299”, then “16 & 11”, which then gives us “27”.
19.5 x 2 = “39”, 3 x 9 = “27”.
“27” is “72” backwards.
2.442 x 1.618 = 3.951156 converges to “963”. 1 + 5 + 6 = “12”, then “3”.
2.772 x 1.618 = 4.485096 converges into “12 14 15”, thus giving us “41” then “44”.
4 x 4 = “16”, which is then “66”.
24 + 42 = “66”.
27 + 72 = “99”.
6 x 6 = “36”.
9 x 9 = “81”.
36 + 81 = “117”, which converges into “27”.
36 + 88 = “124”, which converges into “34”.
27 + 34 = “61”, which is “66”.
27 > 54 > “108” > “216” > “432”, converges into “72”.
34 > 68 > “136” > “272” > “544”, converges into “94”, 9 x 4 = “36”.
66 - 36 = “30”.
72 - 66 = “6”.
306 is “396”. It’s also a mix between “206” and “300”, which are how many bones we have.
396/9 = “44”.
369/9 = “41”. (Proof that the “1” is a mirror, not a number).
41 + 44 = “85”, 8 x 5 = “40” which is “44”. (More proof).
HatingMeIsEasier, if you haven’t been peer reviewed, how do you know it’s not all just inside your head?
Seems to me like the only proof you have been able to make is that you can take any number and arrive at another number if you really want to, which is really quite useless.
Do you can connect pi to the number of chromossomes. What are you or anyone else supposed to do with that information?
I mean… it’s a pretty harmless occupation, I guess, if that is how you want to spend your time… unless you’re on disability, which I think is a real possibility… then you should probably put the computer away and … do some pottery or oil painting or something.
It’s already been peer reviewed… by me. He uses multiplication, addition, subtraction, powers and division arbitrarily. He doesn’t have an algorithmic system for how he uses them, it’s truly an irrational number, ironic since he thinks that he’s cracked the code to irrational numbers. When he even speaks of an irrational number… he arbitrarily terminates the decimal a few places in and calls it the same number, irrational numbers don’t stop at an arbitrary decimal place, that is called an arbitrary approximation. Actually his multiplication that he uses arbitrarily doesn’t even make sense, he’ll add 3+3 and have it equal 60!!! and then he’'ll add 2+4 and have it equal 6… and then he’ll smash the numbers together and call it 66. It’s completely insane.
I know… I… know math… they taught me in school.
My point is that you can continue to shout at people “I am a genius and my work is amazing” and they can continue to shout back at you “no, you’re an idiot” indefinitely, and you are welcome to do so. However, the people who really are making ground breaking discoveries in any field are submitting their work to the community of academics of that field so that it can be reproduced and reviewed, and then published so that it can join the collective body of knowledge.
Seriously, if you are greater than Tesla, what are you doing arguing on a tiny little forum on the corner of the internet? Test out your brilliance, get published.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ma … s_journals
Good luck 
Any peer review journal would say the same thing I just said. 3+3 doesn’t equal 60, it equals 6. But HMIE has this tendency for example to add numbers together and smoosh them.
So he’ll say something like:
3+3 = 6
2+4 = 6
66/2 = 33
33*4 = 132
1+3+2 = 6!!!
Another trick HMIE uses… is that he’ll post REALLY long posts to VERY short replies, so nobody can read the replies.
I know, you know, everyone knows. HMIE doesn’t know because he is craaazy.
There’s a big difference between being told you’re an idiot by just some asshole on the internet, and the same by a peer reviewed journal, though.
Well… not as much as you might think.
An editor pre-reviews your work before it is ever actually reviewed by any group. And even then, that group might be only a very few who have their own theories to promote and not enough time to bother with anything unusual. If you get past that, you might then get published, without it getting squashed for political reasons. And then, you might get reviewed by a more respectable and honest group, usually from a foreign country, less politically concerned.
The rejection rate is very, very high to the point that most reviewers don’t even want to bother reading more than the first few lines - just like on the internet.
Of course academic papers give priority to work coming from people associated with serious educational institutions, funded by grants, etc. By doing that they at least make sure that their time is being spent with something that was written with a minimum of rigor. Nutcases who think they’re geniuses abound. It’s unfortunate that good work is probably buried under tons of complete gibberish. However, there are things you can do to make your paper stand out a little bit more even if you’re not a part of some prestigious university. Not saying it’s easy, but it can be done… Certainly by someone greater than Tesla.
I’m either A. The most intuitive man on this planet.
B. The greatest con artist in the history of Man.
You choose.
I choose C!
[/quote]
Again, I diagnosed you as psychotic and narcissistic. Only a narcissist would consider themselves either the most intuitive person on the planet or the greatest con artist… needing to be the greatest something, so that even if they lose they win in their own heads. I do believe someone can be these things, but I don’t believe you are either. Why? Because you are psychotic. A con artist needs to not be as psychotic as you are… nobody on earth believes that 3+3 = 60. There’s no con going on here, just your very transparent psychosis. Nobody on earth believes that 68 is the Golden Ratio… that would be like saying 3489756 was Pi… nobody believes you, because we all learned that pi is an irrational number when we try to calculate this circumference. It’s certainly not some arbitrary whole number. That’s called psychosis and conspicuous consumption aggression, narcissism… hmmm… yeah that’s it.
Surely you’d only call yourself a great con artist if you’ve made a significant amount of profit (monetary or otherwise) out of conning people. Have you made a lot of money from this?
You responding is profit enough =)
42 is the answer to life according to The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. 
mind… blown.