This seems to contradict “self=others”… though I’m pretty sure you can explain how it doesn’t.
Start Over at One/Whole
The line drawing fallacy is the dualism (false dichotomy) fallacy because it insists something be either one or the other when the other it cannot be absolutely because the other is just the absence of the one.
Nothing contradicts self=other, which maintains distinctions or there could be no one/whole.
How would YOU want to be treated if you were a WHY/valued (not just a what/object, and not a mere how/means) in the dark (uninformed consenter/value-giver)? @Ecmandu
And what if you really like to be the one to solve the puzzle and you don’t like it when other people ruin it for you? I filled in some of the blanks from earlier. Somebody please complete this.
Helpful hints: For original personhood (Source: eternal material/medium) so loved (ontologically prior signalificance/Signal: eternal message, beginning/end, Logos) all others (each and every sink in the Source’s image) that they incarnated as the other (became the Sink: efficient means, demonstration, action in time), so that every consenting self/other will not dissociate (remain alienated) but thrive authentically.
See also:
We ARE the act (will)…not some-thing that wills.
Ergo…willing does not require consciousness - plants will and they have no nervous system.
Freedom is NOT the awareness of willing…it IS willing.
By that time you’ve become aware of your actions, you’ve acted.
So, it is possible to contradict your own beliefs and values and ideals with your actions.
1 Like
Unless you’re the original personhood immanent at every time, unmoved and subsuming (grounding) all change, your argument echoes into an illogical infinite regress.
Just because you aren’t what you merely (idly, void, in vain) say you will do doesn’t mean that what you do-do doesn’t ever start out as what you’ll say you’ll do. I mean, sure, you could be stuck on the asshole program when you are on autopilot, but you can step back in and take control of that downward spiral.
Not you specifically, of course. But I’m definitely not just talking about your behaviors as if they belonged to nothing.
ex nihilo nihil fit
An individual, cat lady, is a continuum…held together by memories.
DNA are inherited memories…and to those an individual adds his own experiences, passing them on to the next generation.
sounds like horseshit.
Are most people in this world “thriving authentically”?
.
And where’s the science proof about the other horseshit as well?
1 Like
women don’t like kind men
ur wrong again.
There is a large portion of women, maybe 60% or more of women, that love emasculated woke retards. The type of man who is anti-gun and pro open borders kind of cuck.
Women love a man who works hard and is a good slave. Women love positivity. If I had to work a store 10 hrs. everyday I wouldn’t be very positive. Even now I am quite negative. Mostly I feel hatred and contempt for society. I hate cis society and I also despise trans-folk that act like the cis I despise. I have nothing but hatred and contempt for this society. If i have to be around a group of low iq bimbos and normies I would be bored after 5 minutes.
1 Like
Here, I Binged it for you. More error correction:
Sorry if this shows up looking funny.
The reason I hate normies and bimbos is because they are low iq idiots who never read Satyr. Those who never read Satyr’s teachings are not human, basically subhuman, because they have no self-awareness, they are almost npcs.
Second reason is their woke NPC pacifist caca garbage will get them enslaved by Europeans. Europeans want to do the Digital ID crap. And enshitify society. All these cucks are retarded traitors. And they want open borders because think all religions can get along because of their lalaland delusions. Christians, Muslims, Jews and Atheists all hate each other and will never get along. Wokes won’t admit reality and only embrace copium.
Third thing. What i can’t stand is how nature decided that women have all the beauty and men have all the brains. That most men are designed by nature to look like ugly retarded caveman troglodytes. What right do women have to hog all the beauty to themselves. Nature cruelly denied beauty to men. It would be divine justice for women to look as ogres, troglyodytes cavemen with a pussy. And all the beautiful femboys to fuck each other. And then women would be treated like incels, and society would be so braindead, so stupid, to wonder why, to wonder “how could this happen”, as if its some big mystery.
2 Likes