Your post-content would probably resonate with a few (if not many) people, these days… negative health can have an impact on our interactions with others/with getting a healthy minimal-amount of socialising. There’s nothing negative about sharing that. 
You can always socialise on here, with myself and [some] others.
Have a bless-ed happy day, my friend.
I think we are on the right track but as usual, there is an undertow. Who we are is a futile question that puts our self in or around the Image of God.
We imagine who we are and we can only postscribe that image as a loving Father. But does that satisfy our longing to describe the big difference between who we think we are, who we most like to be, to satisfy the intended vision which develops using God’s supposed image as a paradigm, or simply at a certain phase of development feel as if the apix has been reached and either we sustain that image, or we rumple back to earlier forms, conflexing willfully that downward slope to reinvent new images based on less subtle form , which may become more and more self absorbing.
Finally the recurring prayer is He is who He is, and now the who is replaced by What He Is.
We have come full circle in deobjectifying God into a total and Self consuming jpanthethic certainty, and the energy that is as self consuming as the vision, is a perpetua mobile, the energy of God, that we have come to identify as Live, never can burn out, It is inexhaustibly transformed into eternal liove.
That is the beginning to the end, Keith the hidden middle, the mechanics by which this Live maintains It’self in eternity.
Now comes the fun part, where the messenger of God, seeks to explain how it is done.Ec suggested that is everyone became the same, then existence could not happen, nor would existence ever be , hence there could never be Man who could conceive the question. Then he says something totally in opposition, that Man is eternal, never dies, hence the conclusion that could be deduced is that there are two states, which both are imminent, objectless energy sources that concurrently, objectlessly have essential characteristics, without any non temporal function other than say, that a dark energy coexisting with the apparent.
Then someone else describes this mechanical interpretation as an overriding proclivity of energy , to seek a face, to subjugate energy into human terms, out of which the whole need to identify that face with the more objective process of how it’s done.
So we go full circle tht Saint Anselm tried to build faith in, and the same skeptics who have denied this pantheistic circle, do not realize that they are nihilism zing ccircle of live.
But then again rationale requires reason, and reason other rationales.
The identification springs out s the major process by which such inquiries come out of
Later,
The final deobjectified element, is supported by Jesus, the messenger, of the message, of which , He was the exemplar, to nihilized the ego, but not life it’self, and be not afraid of being like ‘everybody else’.
Nobody can be like everybody else, the genetic component assures that sexual selection play a big part, perhaps the biggest, to assure that existence will always tend primarily to develop along the lines of materially manifested choice. The developing ‘higher’ forms of conscious realization driving toward the immaterial, is the essence of what human uniformity and reluctance is all about, and that is where a lot of compensatory ego variations, compensations and decomposing processes come out of.
The fear of sins, communism, for one evolves out of a misreoresentation of Jesus message, as that message I’d introjected into an ethical- moralistic divide, and religion and politics develops into conflicts of unrealized potential danger to the stasis and endurance of civilization, or even farther, life as well.
Love is that force of nature, fighting alongside, trying to overcome the fear of pantheism, the fear of the ever closing circle, whose diametric variance is always depended on the triangular area remaining constant, and whose quantum state can never ever pass into a supposed oblivion.
The fear of disengagement is merely a manifestation of a non existent fear of a total reduction into absurdity, which only live alone, that preexisting formula, can never let morph into, all is possible with and within the cosmos, but Love and eternity are synonymous universal entities forming an absolutely unbreakable bond, even if their ‘existence’ does not conform to any conceivable appearance as a preordinate force of life.
Apology: The need to solve riddles , with tools of pre mordial, sui generis modal structural sense, exceeds any and all efforts to figure, how such ever came to be. The paradox, of life it’s self is such, that self realized forms of inquiry necessitates them to such levels, as those that become completely sense-less, yet continue to possess the need to communicate with ‘them’ inter alia.
We are the nonverbal cues or blindspots we can’t control because they are below awareness, and we are what we do with them once we become aware. At least that is how people distinguish us from other people. That is how they judge our behavior or predictability.
Ichthus wrote,
I, personally, can certainly agree with this.
I can feel more lonely or even alone (not in the good way) at times around people.
Those people and even things (let’s say the moon lol for instance), which are capable of resonating within me and me within them, give me such a feeling of inter-connectedness with the whole Universe.
There are also so very many moments in my aloneness that I feel deeply connected with the Universe.
These are moments when we have found ourselves, know ourselves, It is like an ich and du relationship with self and with God also at the same time.
It is also like when our conscious being meets up with our unconscious being. lol Hard to express.
One person outgrew their cave without ever seeing the sun, and blocked out the echo. The other overcame and echoes back. Same signs. Different interpretations. Barely scratches.
youtu.be/xAYSqTu5_ZY?feature=shared
Disclaimer: I found these separately, different sources, months apart.
Source of first was a Facebook page.
Source of second was a YouTube vid with a length matching the numbers you quoted 24:00:47:
youtu.be/GcmURTrRAY8?feature=shared
I just like patterns 
there’s dragons in them thar hills 
We are our actions - both conscious and unconscious.
We are action.
What determines our actions?
Organ hierarchies - organism - determine the individual’s personae, psyche.
The strength of an individual’s impulses, drives, tastes, are determined by his internal organ symmetry/proportionality, and the power of each organ in the organism’s hierarchy - brain being the organ acting as arbiter.
Organ strength within the organism’s hierarchy is determined cellularly - genetically.
Character, i.e., social identity - is the brain’s control of these internal impulses, determining how much of the individual’s personae will be exposed and how much will be supressed or sublimated.
So, an individual is a personae/psyche concealed within a character/caricature.
Prive/Public self.
*Some people have such a weak personae that the character is the only sense of self they have. For such people their public self - character/caricature - their social performance, is all they know of who they are; remaining unconscious and in denial, in regard to an inherited personae/psyche.
*Personae will manifest - express itself - through alternate avenues if it is repressed or allowed to atrophy, e.g., through sexual fantasies, neurosis and a variety of psychological ailments, through dreams, paraphilia and a variety of sexual dysfunctions etc.
Unable to distinguish what is being repressed an individual may feel like he is trapped in the wrong body - dissonance between mind/body, manifesting a conflict between a genetically determined personae and a socially determined character.
anima
there
happy?
When one enters the world without an identity and only gains one as one is conditioned by the context one finds oneself within, the first being mother and family. So, think of yourself as a constitution whether a vital constitution or a somewhat mutated expression of vitality. So, through one’s trials and tribulations of a series of environmental contexts, the process continues until death. Life has many forms but only one essence, identity is not the essence of an organism/person it is the essence called life as a constitution which is anonymous, as there is only one essence with many forms. So, your identity is your journey through the world of contexts, identity is the story of the journey…
That third one reminds me of Elijah hiding out and waiting in the cave until the Lord came and asked him: “Elijah, what are you doing here?”
I love the second one too - beautiful sense of aloneness or solitude - and Van Gogh …ish.
<><><>
Starry starry night. In a Paris cafe after can can with lautrec
Hi Meno,
What has happened with all of the stars in the night sky, Meno? I find it difficult to find even one.
I have seen might Jupiter, I believe, for a while but not for some time now. I mourn the stars.
No, 6 characters
Got to explain Arc, this has absolutely nothing to do with this narrative flow, I was going to write something and the revision failed and then I blanked the page and just had to put something in it, and then the system prompted me to place 5 characters minimum into it, and I wrote ‘5 characters literally(couldn’t think of anything else to put into it)
But then I thought why five why not six? (Characters in search…: of an author… 
Then, 
thinking what I may have had in mind, and all sorts of other things crossing my mind, decided to chuck it, and put it to virtual reality fill the rest through it’s a AI mode of apprehension.
And if that does not make sense to You, you may imagine the less then little it makes to me.
As always,
meno
But not to appear diverged
… the advent of the tech world is sad, for the realizations admitting that some of the stars that are sill visible are not merely forgotten , as few bother to scan the night sky except romantic lovers who still believe in the cosmos’ significance to their earthly counterpart, but the ominous fear that follows same said stars demise.
Some think why bother to look up , at a sky that promotes an aesthetic vision filled with dead stars floating around , the of that must disappoint lovers the world over.
Yes, Arc, the advent of the tech world is sad, for the realizations admitting that some of the stars that are sill visible are not merely forgotten , as few bother to scan the night sky except romantic lovers
I suppose we can sometimes say that it is sad, even brutal and inhumane but at the same time it does have its positive saving graces. The question is: Do we wish that it had never come into existence at all?
…as few bother to scan the night sky except romantic lovers
Well at least…but I do not believe the above to be true. We come from the stars. How can anyone looking up and seeing that starry dome- when it can be seen - lover or not - not feel such a sense of ecstacy and such exquisite beauty flowing through their being!!!
Some think why bother to look up , at a sky that promotes an aesthetic vision filled with dead stars floating around , the of that must disappoint lovers the world over.
lol Meno. but even to have the remnants, the beautiful light which still comes to us, despite that star’s demise, is such an awesome gift and blessing. It reminds us to keep our own light burning.
So true, so human, though, the inescapable fact that the thought of a black hole,
; the very thought of having to pass through that, literally describing a fetus’ struggles to begin - again - to see the light, and through the reason of self justification, no wonder they later on need to relearn the art of primal 
,to recapture the original sensed connection between the birthdeath trauma’s reanactment’s shadowy past.
Gosh!
