Since when has therapy or a psychologist actually changed anything ? And another problem with psychology is they come at human existence with a naturalistic atheistic worldview which cannot provide any philosophical and religious answers.
1 Like
What does the word ‘psychology’ mean, to you, exactly?
And, obviously, ‘psychology’ does change things. This could not be more blatantly obvious.
EVERY time it has, does, and will occur.
But there was NO ‘first problem’ with psychology, for two reasons. So there is literally NO ‘another problem’ here.
‘you’ appear to have NO understanding of what ‘psychology’ is at all.
But ‘we’ will have to wait to see what your definition of ‘psychology’ is, exactly? That is, if you ever do provide ‘your definition’.
See how ‘these people’ are NOT able to back up, support, clarify, nor elaborate on their beliefs and claims AT ALL.
‘Psychology’ actually does change things. Which is just another irrefutable Fact.
So, ‘we’ have here ANOTHER ONE who BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that ‘psychology’ does NOT change absolutely anything in Life.
But, OBVIOUSLY, they were TOO AFRAID to ADMIT this in words.
What is it you want to change?
time’s up
muting thread
Because most of it is remarketed philosophy
There are tons of meta-analysis research (meta analysis is considered the highest level of proof in science, an analysis of some times hundreds of studies) showing that various psychotherapies work significantly. Also there are non-secular leaning and fact-backed psychotherapists and psychotherapies out there. I advice you to do some research and try more than 0, 1 or 2 therapists. Hope it helps
The provenance and influences doesn’t tell us about the fruits. Also we could basically say the same thing of science. Science comes from philosophy, yet it gives fruits.
True, apparently , however, philosophy of mind has!
I have to correct myself. Psychology actually aided greatly to psychologists, in particular, income-wise
1 Like
In Life absolutely everything causes and effect. And, absolutely every effect is change. So, absolutely everything actually changes everything, including so-called “psychology”.
Absolutes, including change can not be proven from the immanence of constant changing states , so such declaration goes only Hal way to realization, or rather, Being Realized
For ‘you’ this maybe true. For ‘I’ things are VERY DIFFERENT.
Change is proven, absolutely, and always.
The Universe is in an eternal constant state of change, also known as ‘evolution’, is prove of and for this irrefutable and absolute Fact.
If ‘you’ cannot fully realise this Fact, then so be it. No one says you have to.
Again that assertive proposition belongs a resembling indistinct family,
Do you mean, ‘that assertive proposition belong ‘to’ a resembling indistinct family’?
If yes, then what ‘assertive proposition’ are you talking about, exactly, and which ‘indistinct family’ are you talking about, and what is ‘that indistinct family’ resembling, exactly?
Per ‘family of resemblences’
So, ‘that assertive proposition’, which I still do not yet know, belongs to A ‘family of resemblances’.
Because they are unaware of the previous. Pro-position
I do not know what the word ‘they’ is referring to ‘now’. Who are ‘the people’ that ‘you’ are talking about ‘now’?