Why Elites Don't Talk

I’ve always found this frustrating. Elites never seem to talk unless they’re trying to exploit someone’s naivete, make someone do something, or push someone around. The idea of compassionate aristocracy only exists when elites aim to compare themselves against someone else who’s either more elite than themselves, or an incredibly small minority in a group who nobody cares about as if they’re carrying out a witch-hunt.

That said, elites have a terribly obnoxious habit of being noisy. Yes, they broadcast lots of words in the public domain, but they don’t prove in advance of the fact why their words are necessarily valid. Instead, they just brutally assert that their words are practical, so they spark a rat race of paranoia where peers are expected to suck up to become elites’ favorites in practicing what elites want.

Why would the elite talk to the worthless, irresponsible people, who never strive toward any significance, standing, or greatness in life?

Why would the rich, who value the wealth they have earned with their own blood, sweat, and hands, want to consort with the poor who beg, plead, and whine for money?

  1. You’re equating social status to ambition.

  2. You’re assuming all elites are ambitious and that the general populace is not.

  3. You’re ignoring when lazy elites don’t talk among the ambitious populace.

Elite doesn’t mean ambitious.

Ambitious people who are stupid, are going to spend their time ineffectively and inefficiently. A hard working moron may never go beyond a certain social status in life. To become “elite” requires a large degree of risk taking, in addition to the intellect, ambition, and patience.

You can do everything right in life, have a 95% shot at becoming elite, and still miss out, even though you did everything right and paid the high price.

So what, want to cry about that??? A nobleman will brush himself off, and try again until he’s dead.

What do you mean by “stupid” and “moron”? Are you talking about people unfamiliar with customs?

You don’t have to be socially aware to be technically competent. Likewise, you don’t have to be technically aware to be socially competent.

…so you’re saying elites don’t talk because they exploit good luck?

I mean ambition and hard work, alone, is not elite and will not drive an average person into elitism. Intellect is required, both technically and socially.

Elites don’t talk because they are rare, and don’t want to waste time talking to commoners, or losers who cannot ever hope of attaining an elite status.

Elites want to keep the company of other, already proven elites, because like attracts like. Commoners are losers to the elite classes and castes.

…so how does that establish or maintain elite social status in the first place?

You would think elites would be interested in legacy in order to rejuvenate company over time.

The biggest problem Noblemen and Aryans have always had, is consistently this…

Greatness is not only about blood. Rarely does the son or daughter wrought from the elite caste, become elite or great in a comparable manner to the parent. Noble blood is not enough, alone, to become deserving of elite status. In other words, the elites sometimes birth and bare invalid children, worthless children. These worthless children fall from elite status to commoner status. They neither strive to or maintain greatness.

Therefore, the elites must identify not so much with bloodline, but with the ideological status of elitism.

Elitism is not only genetic. It is also memetic. I believe that an elite will sometimes, if necessary, choose foreign blood over familial blood. An elitist will choose another elitist over his own children, if his own children fail to become great themselves. In this case, tradition means nothing. Tradition is no guarantee of greatness of nobility. Neither is bloodline.

This has always been the downfall of aristocracy, nobility, elitists, and the Aryan race.