.
@Carleas… you think this is non-philosophical chat?
Abortion isn’t, but paedophilia is?
.
@Carleas… you think this is non-philosophical chat?
Abortion isn’t, but paedophilia is?
I think it’s possible to create a non-philosophical topic about either.
And yes, that particular topic is non-philosophical.
.
I beg to differ… there’s nothing non-philosophical about it.
But you do you!
informed consent respect.
for a being subject to time it takes time to become informed.
language/images point to meaning/quality that is actual (taken within the whole) (merely essential if not now)
…that is all I am permitted to say at this present moment.
.
You added nothing to the discussion, so no loss there.
To add to my last reply. Animals that do not have what humans have, have the information they need already in their genes. It’s almost like there was some information left out of our genes on purpose. What wasn’t left out was the hunger for it, and we were structured to hunger for it together and find that sustenance together. By an alignment of wills—NOT a dissolution of wills. For such willful alignment, information (both sending & receiving) must be voluntary. And what is sent and received must be actual (essential) information and not …malicious. Treat the sender as receiver, and treat the receiver as sender, or you’re just going to end up with a bunch of noise.
Hear me now?
.
I prefer when all I was good for was to be made into a laughing stock for the amusement of the ‘name withhelds’ and others… go talk to them, as I have zero interest in anything you say.
You made a sarcastic poll last year, then for some reason revived the thread last week with an unrelated screenshot of a Google search and link to an Instagram post.
Philosophy is a big tent, but this ain’t it.
I only ever withheld one name, so I dunno what you’re even talking about.
It’s a creative opening post…
I’m a creative person…
Those in the judicial sector are not creative…
You are in the judicial sector so just don’t get it, therefore exercising a bias.
.
…for some reason? Obviously… otherwise I wouldn’t have revived it, would I.
.
Unrelated, really?
.
…and I [*still] beg to differ.
I think, that such topics simply just aren’t your thing.
My thing is philosophy.
.
Cherry-picked philosophy, yes.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.