Will machines completely replace all human beings?

[James_S_Saint]

@surreptitious57

@jerkey

great deal of what it took to develop the internet went to porn

Believe it or not but less than one per cent of the internet is porn

But it didn’t start that way. Sex was used to sell the early Internet to the public, just like the original movie films. Similarly, already animated android robots are being promoted as sex objects … even to women (who will of course, blame the entire industry on men).

[Arminius]

It is an error to believe that robots should have sex (excepted that they use sex for the control of humans).

@Arminius

Most of all living beings, especially all older species (thus the huge majority of all living beings) are not capable of having sex. They live without any sex or something like sex.

|=>

[Arminius]

For robots themselves sex is a disadvantage.

[James_S_Saint]

@Arminius

It is an error to believe that robots should have sex (excepted that they use sex for the control of humans).

@Arminius

Most of all living beings, especially all oldest and most of the older species (thus the huge majority of all living beings) are not capable of having sex. They live without any sex or something like sex.

|=>

Well … when you hold your android phone up to her android phone, you can bet that whatever viruses yours had, just got passed along. And together they can produce third fresh start.

How is that not sex?

Take two androids download, and distill their experiences into a third, and guess what. Just keep doing that for generation after generation, and guess what…

[Arcturus_Descending]

@Arminius

For robots themselves sex is a disadvantage.

Why?

[Moreno]

@James S Saint

@Arminius

It is an error to believe that robots should have sex (excepted that they use sex for the control of humans).

@Arminius

Most of all living beings, especially all oldest and most of the older species (thus the huge majority of all living beings) are not capable of having sex. They live without any sex or something like sex.

|=>

Well … when you hold your android phone up to her android phone, you can bet that whatever viruses yours had, just got passed along. And together they can produce third fresh start.

How is that not sex?

Well, I caught a cold from one of my coworkers and I certainly hope, at the very least in legal terms, he and I did not have sex. If I had caught genital herpes from him, well, I’d hang my head and confess to my wife.

[James_S_Saint]

@Moreno

Well, I caught a cold from one of my coworkers and I certainly hope, at the very least in legal terms, he and I did not have sex. If I had caught genital herpes from him, well, I’d hang my head and confess to my wife.

Flirting is the beginning of sex, yano.

[Arminius]

@James S Saint

@Arminius

It is an error to believe that robots should have sex (excepted that they use sex for the control of humans).

@Arminius

Most of all living beings, especially all oldest and most of the older species (thus the huge majority of all living beings) are not capable of having sex. They live without any sex or something like sex.

|=>

Well … when you hold your android phone up to her android phone, you can bet that whatever viruses yours had, just got passed along. And together they can produce third fresh start.

How is that not sex?

Well, … I would not seriously call that “sex”.

[Moreno]

@James S Saint

@Moreno

Well, I caught a cold from one of my coworkers and I certainly hope, at the very least in legal terms, he and I did not have sex. If I had caught genital herpes from him, well, I’d hang my head and confess to my wife.

Flirting is the beginning of sex, yano.

In my culture being in the same room with someone who sneezes is not flirting.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

The only possible benefits of robots is sex bots obviously.

[Arminius]

@HaHaHa

The only possible benefits of robots is sex bots obviously.

Sex bots?

And:

[Arminius]

@Sebastian Anthony (EXTREMETECH)

By 2025, ‘sexbots will be commonplace’ – which is just fine, as we’ll all be unemployed and bored thanks to robots stealing our jobs.

Do you agree?

[Arminius]

Possibly, the machines will prevent the extinction of all human beings, or they will not prevent but accelerate it.

@Arminius

What if we have no chance anymore to get out of the rationality trap in which collective rationality and individual rationality are in conflict?

@Arminius

At last the tragedy of the commons leads to the extinction of those who work or contribute otherwise and support those who do not work or do not contribute otherwise and do not supprt anybody, although the latter have own children and the former not. So those who have offspring survive as long as they can have offspring, and the others who have no offspring die out. So it is worthwhile in a commons to be lazy, if a certain number of members is not lazy. But it is to be expected that more and more members of the group will behave lazy and group earnings will fall further, since - morally spoken - a typical human maxim is not the maximization of the own advantage but the avoidance of the own disadvantage. So the tragedy of the commons escalates and escalates, and the whole group gets into a rationality trap in which collective rationality and individual rationality are in conflict. In addition to the rationality trap that I just described, there is also the opposite case in which common resources are increasingly exhausted. In this way, not only many environmental problems, but, interestingly, the population explosion in many countries can be explained. The Neomalthusianist Garret Hardin believed that a liberal access to public goods will at last be the ruin of all. Therefore he called for corresponding restrictions.

@Arminius

@Garret Hardin

Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.

The tragedy of the commons means an evolutionary suicide.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

[Arminius]

@Arminius

Possibly, the machines will prevent the extinction of all human beings, or they will not prevent but accelerate it.

@HaHaHa

If the machines will become smart enough, then they will need no cages for the humans.

[Arminius]

Mercedes Self Driving Car Recreates World’s First Car Journey Mercedes S Class 2016 CARJAM TV:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiiNHHXugyo[/youtube]

• youtube.com/watch?v=ZiiNHHXugyo

[Arminius]

No self driving cars:

Daimler, 1886:
Daimler, DMG Lastwagen Cannstatt, 1896:
Volkswagen, VW Käfer Cabrio:

[Arminius]

@Moreno

Until we or whatever we make to replace ourselves, replace them with gm machines and nano-cellulose goops which we take on our spacecraft upon leaving a dead and used up planet behind ‘us’.

Do you think that machines will “eat” the crust of the planet?

[Amorphos]

I don’t believe there to ultimately be a shortage of materials, reusable grown materials like carbon crystals and organics will replace metals and plastics.

We and machines will be replaced by something which is conscious and infinitely adaptive. Think skyrim, where bodies/forms/machines are the things the characters/consciousnesses beget, and can change and hop in and out of. There may not even be ownership et al! The difference between one thing being better that another is thence interchangeable, just like getting in and out of a car.

[Arminius]

Intelligent existence needs something like subsistence / sustenance.