Hi there, l think l’ve found your core argument - the above quote ^^^
I don’t see any argument to disprove or even noticeably push back against my idea that monotheism came first, as revealed by a prophet (every nation on earth had at least one, there were over 120,000 in total), then materialism took over aftr each prophet’s death, thus we got idol intercessors / Deism, and eventually Atheism, which is abject materialism. This stands to reason.
What do you have to contradict?
And what makes you think l can’t take the heat? My only objection is when people do not debate, and just assert willy nilly.
By the way, the other stuff l said can be summed up thus: l feel you’re rehashing Am-Way even though you think you’ve separated from that mindset. Also the problem with heterodoxy is when the docs don’t agree - youn have no Furqan. Furqan = Objective Criterion. We call our holy book the Furqan. What is your Furqan? Something you just “feel”? 
Response welcome