I answered you, woman….first, an elderly does not have the cognitive abilities of youth…..and he can remain productive….his farm is not retired.
But citizenship need not be taken away if a man has proven to be a good citizen for all his life.
There might be amendments made to accommodate special circumstances.
Don’t you have a gossip forum to go to?
Did they shut it down, dear?
Why?
Was it so brilliant? It must have been if you were one of its members.
By and by…my Timocracy is slightly different….
Race is another criterion…I thought you would love that one…Aaaand…
Citizenship is given to the family, exercised by the eldest male….and then inherited by the eldest son.
If no son exists, then the eldest daughter, until she has a son of her own.
Second and third sons must earn their citizenship separately.
Chew on that one, sweetheart.
So among the elderly without children, only farmers would be allowed to vote, unless special considerations are made by the voting class to allow a retired non-farmer without children to vote? Is that correct?
Nope…..I used farmer as an example little lady.
Are you dyslexic?
What did I say, woman?
What words did I use?
Can you define ‘woman’?
I want evidence of your mental health….
Define woman for me.
So who else besides a farmer never really “retires”, a stock broker or real estate mogul perhaps?
Silenus:
I answered you, woman….first, an elderly does not have the cognitive abilities of youth…..and he can remain productive….his farm is not retired.
But citizenship need not be taken away if a man has proven to be a good citizen for all his life.
There might be amendments made to accommodate special circumstances.
K: a couple of point, one ''how does one prove themselves to be
a good citizen all his life"" What criteria is used and just as importantly,
who gets to judge this matter? Your theory, such as it is, is woefully
weak on details…it sounds like our current system in which one is
judged to be a good citizen that is one who is a good producer,
a good consumer and a good worker… that for you defines a good
citizen and that is exactly the same qualities modern day
capitalism wants…Your system is just a fancier version of
modern day capitalism with a little bit of political flourish…
Kropotkin
A stock broker?
Do you udnerstand the words I am typing?
Go back and re-read what I posted.
Is this not obvious?
If a man has served in the military and then consistently produced tangible goods for a lifetime, he has proven himself.
It’s not a “theory”….it was practiced before democracy….Read Hanson’s book “A War Like No Other.”
It preceded democracy.
Your brain is inundated by Jew communism…..
There were systems before communism, Krap-on-It
A citizen works for himself….HE produces tangible goods…he does not work for someone who does.
By the way…Krap-on-It…exploitation is part of nature.
You are alive because YOU’ve exploited another life.
The twits are encased in Marxism…..the woman asks…stockbrokers….are they eligible citizens?
What tangible good does a stockbroker produce?
She cannot escape her indoctrination in Marxism…..
She must delve into her Capitalism evil doers…..to find my angle.
Can she define woman, for us?
So how do we reach this timocracy? What needs to be done next? What has to happen socially?
Collapse…..
So, like I said, woman….Timocracy is improbable, unless we escape earth…..
Therefore, I am an ethno-socialist….the next best thing.
Not my first choice.
Define woman for me, woman.
A woman is a female human being.
Define female.
Don’t use synonyms, hypocrite.
What differentiates a man from a woman?
In most cases child bearing, however, that has potential flaws as there have been, on rare occasions, men who have had children and as biological technology increases that may become a more problematic definition.
Silenus:
Define female.
Don’t use synonyms, hypocrite.
What differentiates a man from a woman
K: and this little question solves nothing… it has no other
value to do distract us from the question at hand…
this is just a waste of time question…
Kropotkin
There it is…there’s my Woke princess.
So you are a cultural Marxist….LGBTQJEW+…right princess?
The end phase of Americanism.
And what is a woman, oh wise silenus?
Silenus:
There it is…there’s my Woke princess.
So you are a cultural Marxist….LGBTQJEW+…right princess?
The end phase of Americanism.
K: and you are making a moral judgement… for example,
what is ‘’'WOKE"" What ‘‘WOKE’’ is basically is the
idea that we treat people with dignity and respect…
that is all, in its entirety what ‘‘WOKE’’ is…
and every moral judgement, as Nietzsche pointed out,
is predicated on values that cannot be substantiated…
What is the criteria of judging ''WOKE?" You can’t even
tell us the criteria used to judge if ‘‘WOKE’’ is right, wrong
or indifferent? This play exactly into the point of this thread…
it sounds good to you, so your think, claim it is in some
fashion, philosophical… but it is merely prejudice, superstition
that allows you to believe in the incorrectness of ‘‘WOKE’’…
I think its wrong and without any arguments made, it becomes
wrong… for no other reason than you believe it… and that is
the entirety of creating this post…you have allowed your own
personal bigotry and prejudice to dictate your philosophy…
Kropotkin
Not sure, SK? Do you need me to try another definition for you? Or do you think you’ll figure out what a woman is on your own and prove to me by telling me what the definition of a woman is?