The sheer irony of it all!!
Again, the whole point of this thread is to explore the manner in which I suggest that my reaction to you as “shameless!” can only be subjectively rooted in dasein.
I’m not arguing that objectively – philosophically, scientifically – you are shameless.
And it’s not a contradiction that “I” derive from this…
If I am always of the opinion that 1] my own values are rooted in dasein and 2] that there are no objective values “I” can reach, then every time I make one particular moral/political leap, I am admitting that I might have gone in the other direction…or that I might just as well have gone in the other direction. Then “I” begins to fracture and fragment to the point there is nothing able to actually keep it all together. At least not with respect to choosing sides morally and politically.
…it’s ambiguity, ambivalence, uncertainty, vacillation, disquietude, self-doubt.
Precisely the sort of things that God or No God objectivists have spent years keeping at bay through one or another dogmatic moral or political or spiritual font.
Which, in my view, is why over and over and over and over again, you bend over backwards to avoid an exchange with me that focuses in on your own experiences in confronting conflicting goods given your interactions with others.
And the part where, given a set of circumstances of your own choosing, we delve deeper into why your own “sense of identity” is nothing at all like mine here:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 1&t=176529
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 1&t=194382