JohnJBannan wrote:Meno_ wrote:So to put it into philo sofic . God can be characterized as an a-priori synthetic apprehension.
That is what they asked prior to connecting neuro morphology with philosophical investigations.
How can an apple be red and green all over? How are synthetic a-priori judgments be possible? Do sense-data lead to absurd reduction?
So in order to reconnect the fractured ontology, they reverted to sensation , mostly via color apprehension.
Who watches black and white TV or vintage movies anymore?
Sure there are some who consider black and white more basic, where shadows van infer shades of differences, which apprehend a more cognitive sense of perception.
To me, that sort of projection, for projection was more a-propo in that past age, images tended to be more connected to imaginative functions , and the shadow world was more closely tied to the mysterious.
Prior images tended to collude with recognizable similar archetypal significant others, ....
They became more spatially separated , allowing wider gaps, and those allowed far greater latitude in establishing recognizable models, of both kinds, one exaggerated and blown up, the other diminished .
One larger, the other, smaller then life.
God, belonged into the nether, the ether world exceeding the smallest and the largest possible apprehension, ....
In fact He was the combination of all possible light as energy levels, He could be intuned by the White enemation , so white, that He became invisible.
The total negation of all colors, white, is the absence of any, the total darkness .
This proof , as hermetically textual , presents the negation of darkness not merely white, but totally invisible, if a comprehension of total energy levels could be represented.
' The visible and the invisible 'could shed light on the phenomenal presence of God, in ways where the continuing debate through the logical language through which God and men communicate may fail.
You really have a knack for missing a simple point.
Something’s got to be uncaused. Something’s got to choose. Ergo, God.
I thought about simplicity as well.
The only 'simple' solution is this:
Causation is ' all in the mind .
The difference between a caused and a non caused event, is also in the mind.
Whatever is in the mind, is an abstraction, it doesn't 'exist'
The what , of conscioisness, the when and where, are all in the mind of a.'thing' , which are all constructs,
.
So to say, to understand, and finally to know of what is the thing that exists, is all conjecture of conceptual, non sensible events, where event a do not ever happen in space time.
In fact nothing exists, since existence is a predicate that of being, without phenomenal dimensions.
Now it gets thicker , but even simpler.
That without existence is impossible , that without existence is neither caused or uncaused, because difference has nothing to do with unity or flow or.continuum , either, because they are mere concepts based on sensibility.
Finally, there is no non sensible manifestations, because such is simply a negation of the sensible.
Therefore , the non sensible is only on the mind as well.
The non sensible has to be an absolute non existence, because singular seminal existence is impossible, because there never is such .
Therefore if there is a sensible non existence , it has to be absolute, and that absolute has.to be inn The Mind, that is God's mind.
So, a seminal non existent absolute has to exist in the mind, therefore God exists because if He didn't , the sensible would not have it's negative , it's -non existent predicate , to conceive it with.
The duality of this conscious requisite , are logically tied , so only God can discern the difference between existence and non existence, between consciousness and unconscious ness.
Therefore there exists nothing that can not be predicated by nothing. .
Absolute consciousness is independent of consciousness because it needs to get the ball rolling to the point must before identification of the absolute , the consciousness of which appears sequential, and developmentally objectively sequenced.
The objective is to learn and understand the absolute objective for that development, and that is the conceptual understamding of the need to integrate and differentiate between the one and the many, the other.
So the thing is, the other is never really any other, it is always it's self, because differentiation is the pre requisite to conscious sense of the other, and that differentiation is the result of the conceptual realization of phenomenal organization leading to Its own self integration.
Therefore ,again, GOD, or, am uncaused conception can not not exist, since if It didn't , then it could not become conscious of it's own existence, nor of the existence of the Other.
Existence is all there is, It is It's own predicate.
You see, the many proofs indicate the various ways Absolute necessity requires to induce a sense , a phenomenal sense of am Absolute uncaused cause. because as.soon as a cause begins, the causal sequencing begins to make sense primarily of It's self, .
Beyond that, there is an appearent Other, contingent on the UNCAUSED CAUSE of prephenomimal construction.
That is the contingency that determines the constructed difference between existence and phenomena, between Being (by logical necessity) and Nothingness (by sensory development)
Necessity preceeds a logical differentiation, existence has.to be an eternal continuum where the 'gaps' are existential markers , -stills (Parmenidies) that are constantly shuffled into various programs of possible simulated sequential connections, and the very large co-coincidental overlaps -between the very large still and the very small, simulate what sensation determines TO BE the sensible displacement of same said existential predicate.
That eternal displacement , that reshuffling of the Ansolute reservoir , the content of which is the Absolute awareness.
Logic predosppses any other contingency , therefore Chaos is only a negation of an under lying order.
Disintegration can not proceed unto an Absolute order, by token of the same sensible argument.
For if not, existence could never be one pejorative, and Absolute nothingness could become conceivable.
But it can not not become conceivable , therefore it never exists.
