It has come to my attention recently of a ''suicide" note
written by one, Mitchell Heisman… and while investigating it,
I came across some interesting things…
It’s very title is “Suicide Note” and should read as such,
but this “note” is over 1900 pages long… and even has its
own bibliography… which begs the question is this even
a suicide note or a doctorial paper written as a doctorial thesis…
as it is cold, bloodless, thin… it is a doctorial thesis, not
a suicide note… and the basic question is this, can we
reason our way into meaning in our lives? and the answer is
no, as most people, not named Plato or Aristotle, can
reason their way into the meaning of existence…
reason cannot, cannot give our lives meaning, purpose,
but it can lay out the ground in which we find existence…
and what gives our lives meaning? things that cannot be
reasoned/measured , love, hope, peace, beauty, integrity,
courage, kindness… to name just a few values which give us
our meaning/purpose…
I hold that right at the very beginning of philosophy,
Socrates engaged with us in very important motto’s,
one, know thyself
and two, the unexamined life isn’t worth living…
but notice he didn’t specify how we are to know thyself
or how are we to examine our lives? We can use reason
but we can also use emotions, feelings to discover
what it means to examine our lives… we can examine our
lives through whatever lens, or medium we choose, reason
or emotions… or as we should, through both lenses…
Heisman describes life through a disengaged, distant,
scholarly approach… with a bibliography… that isn’t a suicide note…
it is cold and impersonal… and it reads as such…Heisman isn’t
wrestling with life, he is coldly examining it… dissecting it as it were…
he isn’t engaged with the subject matter, his life… and I suspect that is
why Lorikeet likes it… by his own admission, Lori is a dilettante,
with no effort to engage with, to live with his subject matter…
and as Heisman makes no effort to wrestle with his life, to
get up close and personal with what it means to be human…
the path of philosophy is to engage with “blood, sweat and tears”
with philosophy, with what it means to be human…
Heisman and lori, like to stare at life from a distance,
with no engagement with it… which is a cold, distant,
bloodless way to philosophize… and which is why
Lori hates Nietzsche… Nietzsche, along with Kierkegaard
and Wittenstein, philosophize with their blood, sweat
and tears…and how did Descartes philosophize? cold,
distant, bloodless…and how did Spinoza philosophize?
If you have read Spinoza, you know the answer…
and how did Kant philosophize? You already know…
Even the dilettante Lori knows that answer…
Pretend to write a “suicide note”… is it cold, distant,
bloodless… or does it have the blood, sweat and tears of
your life within it?
Kropotkin