Moreno Iâve been called a leftist, a capitalist pig, a jesus freak, a crackheadâŚall kinds of things by all kinds of people. I think one thing people like about the internet is that they can decide who you are in their minds and then argue with whatever they hate whether youâre actually that person or not.
I think of âwhoreâ the same way I think of âchefâ or âcar salesmanâ or âjanitorâ. Itâs just a job. Canât worry about being moral and all that until youâve got food and shelter. Once the bills are paid we can entertain all kinds of philosophical things. I canât judge people on how they make their money. (With some limits of course, I meanâŚI donât want hitmen to have it easy.)
So you were just thinking that more women make money in the sex trade by directly selling their own physical contact than men do. I think that is true. I donât think that is all that Joker is on about.
Thing is, for males it isnât bad to be a whore because it doesnât make them deviate from their role, in fact, it may help them achieve their role and the role of males is to spread their seed as much as they can (which means to have sex with as many women as they can).
The role of the female is a mother role - to have a child and caress it, and since you can have a child only with 1 man, the more the female deviates from being with only 1 man the more she fails at her role.
Yes, men and women are different organisms and should be judged by different standards. God designed it that way (right, my fellow theists?), so who are you to say otherwise?
Women belong in the submission of men. When theyâre not in the submission of men they get out of control and fuck over society by destroying the traditional family unit as modern western civilization is an example of. Women belong on a tight leash otherwise theyâll disrupt society largely as a whole.
A man that must leash a woman shows that he is weak minded and fear filled, just as a woman is that feels she must control her man. Both are weak and lesser for it.
In 2008 the European Parliament decided to forbid advertisements showing women doing housework. They also forbid adverts showing strong men mowing the lawn.
This was followed by banning all allusions to the traditional gender role from schoolbooks, videos, computer games and the internet.
Women who just want to stay at home, have children and look after the house and the family, are already now regarded as being lazy, not to say asocial.
I think itâs useless blaming women for being like they are made now. They will merely feel insulted and start defending their new design or their designers, because they told them that they got more freedom now. You got to look behind the scenery. Whose interest is it to have women like this, who are only interested in money and career?
In the USA, it goes far beyond that. Films were not allowed to show the male hero saving a woman. She had to save herself and usually him too. They have slacked up on that a bit, but still women must be displayed as being at least as physically strong as men, smarter than men, more innocent than men, wiser than men, all n all better than men, and of course big lumbering black males lusting after super attractive white females, their superiors.
The new world is a world of psychologically and medically programmed drones to serve the Socialist Emperor Queen - Bee Hive, Ant Colony design. It isnât life when someone else is making all of the decisions.
Of course all of it is ânatural random evolutionâ. And since it is completely artificial, the only thing left when it is over is going to be a completely android life form (or a black hole). Homosapian is dead. He just doesnât know it yet as the noise fades down to a simple whir.
And I had a strange idea that the one being leashed and controlled is the weaker and fear filled one. The stronger one will submit the weaker one and control him/her. The strong are in control, the weak are subservient. Both are afraid - the strong one is afraid of losing his superior position, the weak one is afraid of the strong one.
Werenât allowed? I mean I agree itâs totally unrealistic that a 45kg chick wins a fight against 3-5 grown 80-100kg males, but itâs an action movie, who cares. I donât think they werenât ALLOWED to do it, but itâs just more cunning to make a few relevant, strong female characters in a movie to market it towards the female (more precisely, lesbian and feminist) audience more successfully. Look at Fast and Furious 5 and 6. Almost all possible combinations of race and gender are represented with characters so people all around the world can identify with them.
Also, not everything is a conspiracy JSS, for fucks sake
No. The root meaning of 'whore' is somebody who trades sex for material gain. That's the exact opposite of somebody who will have sex with anyone, or who takes sex casually.
If you actually know what the word 'whore' means, and know what the criticism [i]really is[/i] that men are making when they call women whores, then complaining about women being whores while complaining that you can't get laid is completely consistent. You are attacking a strawman.
Not saying women ARE whores, but statik wanted a counter argument, and it was just staring me in the face so I had to oblige.
Hm, the definition of a whore I used is simply a promiscuous person who has a lot of sex with a lot of people. I also use the word âslutâ for that same meaning. Under that definition I actually agree with Moreno that men are bigger whores, itâs just that as I explained itâs not a bad thing for a man to be a whore while it is for a woman.
âHookerâ and âprostituteâ is what I use for people who trade sexual services for material gain.
But wouldnât it be really naive, NOT to see a pattern in that?
Why do you think Hollywood likes it so much to portray the opposite of reality: making women more dominant/stronger while men submissive/weaker. Why is the feminist worldview and the âbattle of the sexesâ so much supported by the media. To get a few more lesbians in the cinemas?
The most effective way to make a population more manageable is to divide itâŚdivide et impera - divide and conquer-; this goes back to Machiavelli. When you see it in this context: If there are the means to program a society, do you really think they wonât be used?
Yeah, if âwhoreâ means âinclined to promiscuityâ then Iâd agree men tend to be more guilty- to the extent that I canât imagine why anybody would try to claim the opposite.
Optimistically, because people are much more likely to be offended by the truth than by irony and they donât want to rock boats. Cynically? Because theyâre all a bunch of social Marxists using the soapbox theyâve been given to undermine one more pillar of traditional human society.