Yeah - I’m back. The whole going away thing was part of a certain scheme of mine, that I disregarded —Satyr knows what I’m talking about.
Kryptocunt, or however you spell you’re name…you seem like you are, most likely, a tweaker. I’m basing that off your erratic and eccentric writings and other crack-head like peculiarities.
I wouldn’t know darl… I’ve never been with a man for his money and I’m not up for being manipulated (it’s a massive turn off don’t you think?) so the money only option wouldn’t work for me, which leaves the looks/looks&money options.
But even with the last option, the moneyed-person can still think the other is with them for their money regardless of both being lookers…
You could be manipulated either way, it’s just easier with money.
Which means what? That using money as a tool of manipulation wouldn’t work as easily? True, but the question was: what would you rather be used for–money or looks?