I wouldn’t know darl… I’ve never been with a man for his money and I’m not up for being manipulated (it’s a massive turn off don’t you think?) so the money only option wouldn’t work for me, which leaves the looks/looks&money options.
But even with the last option, the moneyed-person can still think the other is with them for their money regardless of both being lookers…
You could be manipulated either way, it’s just easier with money.
Which means what? That using money as a tool of manipulation wouldn’t work as easily? True, but the question was: what would you rather be used for–money or looks?
Dont give up on him. Hes just a massive victim I think. For unknown reasons, and Im guessing he would be the last person to really know of those reasons.
There’s still a gap. People lowball me all the time on job offers, assuming I’ll just take it because I’m a woman. Makes negotiating a lot more difficult.
I think hands beat tongues in this respect. Aren’t like 50% of oral cancers linked to tongue usage? And it just seems a little wrong to lubricate something that is self-lubricating…
Do you know it’s because you’re a woman? Have you scientifically compared your offers to others, male and female, within the same range of experience, skill set, education, etc.?
What’s your occupation? Part time or full time? How many years experience? Continuous or intermittent?