False, you make similar mistakes about linguistics as I’ve seen Faust make.
Language doesn’t make identity, and neither is behaviorism. And idea, when we say “we are doing so and so” isn’t listed to self stylized descriptions, but the verbs others observe.
The doer is only one consciousness in the crowd, if everyone is agast while the one doer is at peace, it means either the doer has a far, far better understanding of what is going on that anyone else, is a true mastermind if the situation… or he is a delusional fuckup who doesn’t quite grasp just what has gone wrong.
A judge or lawyer dies not have to rely on the defendants definition of rape to find then guilty, and his ability to refute culpability, or feel shane, guilt, or remorse doesn’t make him any less of a rapist. His ability to forget the events that occurred, convince himself of his lies, proclaim himself a Superman doesn’t change it either.
We are human, we are capable of inductive and deductive reasoning, knowledge is social in ways that it isn’t internal, who we are likewise divides on that basis. A horrible fucking shithead desiring only positive propaganda while doing foul deeds doesn’t have a moral right to hide away in the unstable syllogisms that moral relativity is constructed from, they don’t have the right to construct their own world within a shared language, and preach it, without counter or criticism. If parallels are found and asserted, it it can be shown your behavior more closely resembles these other systems, that you have a history of lying, that your a closeted adherent of another system, and ate abusing others unsuspecting trust, than it is fully right to call it out, actually is a duty in philosophy to unmask such deceitful frauds. You can’t just say like Anakin Skywalker right before he burnt up in the volcano like a idiot “From my perspective the Jedi are the badguys”… the human modes of reasoning are so much broader than that, and our capacity to detect shit should be widespread, mutually supporting and integrated too. We shouldn’t let dainty frauds dance all over the truth, especially dainty little self appointed Neo-Nazis Godmen demanding respect where non is deserved, claiming superiority without merit. The The perspective of a worthless Nietzschean doesn’t matter, in the Stoic concept of the term, but a man who stives to uncover and speak in defence of the truth, as a halbringer of what actually is, is worthy.
I’ve seen far too many deciets played on thus forum by the Nietzscheans. It isn’t enough to say it us your perspective and so in a way your right, or to claim legitimacy because more fools back you. That is all quickly washed away in a torrent of disillusionment. The truth needs to stand on better merits.