_
…an oldie but a goodie, last night… The Terminator.
As I hadn’t seen it in years, it was as if I was watching it for the first time, through fresh new eyes and mind… but I guess that’s what the passing of time does, for ya.
_
Budget $210 million, Box office $1.104 billion… what!
I didn’t realise it was so high grossing. :shock:
Transformers 4, is more Transformers meets
Resident Evil… good thing I like both those films.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Nzelc5Mj38[/youtube]
_
Transformers: Age of Extinction
Directed by Michael Bay
Produced by Lorenzo di Bonaventura | Tom DeSanto | Don Murphy | Ian Bryce
Written by Ehren Kruger
Based on Transformers, by Hasbro
Starring Mark Wahlberg | Stanley Tucci
Music by Steve Jablonsky
Cinematography Amir Mokri
Edited by William Goldenberg | Roger Barton | Paul Rubell
Production company Hasbro | Di Bonaventura Pictures
Distributed by Paramount Pictures
Release date June 19, 2014 (Hong Kong) | June 27, 2014 (United States)
Running time 165 minutes
Country United States
Language English
Budget $210 million
Box office $1.104 billion
.
_
I’ll be watching this in 25 minutes… better be good, or I’m changing channels. 
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCcx85zbxz4[/youtube]
Blade Runner, I’d like to see that again.Maybe tonight.
The Last Man on Earth
Saw it way back, but some claim it’s almost a sinister plot, plan to see it tomorrow.
The Descent. Killer.
Netflex: Sound of Metal
Found it hyperbolic and great visuals, actors practicing obvious restraint, that could be softened.
But the overall effect was superbly crafted.
My kinda film Meno… I think I’ll watch it in a bit.
The random snap shots of experiences unfolding,
is very compelling… and I like being compelled. ; )
_
The Duchess. 
Interesting, MagsJ, will plan to see it.And this is a must rewatch, at least personally.:and very much aligned with women going through dramatic changes.:
_
Do what you want!
I don’t think I have to worry about what to do about what i want, at any rate, both films have promise and pull.
I’d rather see movies with a lot of latitude, and promise of deeply dramatic flair, inscriptions successful social change, without loosing the patent glimmer of the surface, while absorbing the effect of genuine and meaningful colors.
Your film used a lot of pastels, indicating a hopeful resolution, while suspending too much contrast, so as to frame the success of the mix.
The Truffaur film, mine choice, is oppositely focuses on contrasting colors, indicative a more referential descenr: in fact the emulation of the thick literality of Victor Hugo, has not successfully translated into the paper thin fragility of Adjani. The lack of optical optimism, has no promising lead into a successful embrace of both characters, the interaction stems from a very deep structural efficacy on part of the translated Hugo daughter, to the barrage of whirling emotional phenomena .
Your film , much more gracefully accepts the heaviness of the romantic sacraficd, and textually is much more evident of feminine thoughtfulness than of the mistique of sacrafice.
I am try in to make ‘lovs’ excluding all elss, to be the focal point between any and all dramatists personae.