Is there a hypothetical which can shed light on recurrence, that backs up other aligned and related pre-suppositions bearing on more certainty?
Such hypothesis may range in the gamut from less to more certainty.
Even such a proposition risks an underlying variability, based on factors such as: faith, opinion, bias, thereby giving the hypothesis a pseudo scientific appearance.
However, inverse speculation is like a mirror image, therefore, if reversal can be arguably based to it’s original suppositions that gave rise them.
In this light . with applying the theories of the relative nature that they can be held in/at bay, the contexts within them can vary.
Evolution may imply an inverse devolution.
More to the point, how can the advent of science play on the seemingly contrary notion of the general intelligence of the individual memory?
As the earliest forms of memory devices took informally very long times to develop, the more sophisticated reliance on specific applications has become shorter, and automatic.
The virtual realization of these processes is be coming obvious, as general construction of information technology have given way to more specificity, with more advanced relay systems between associated functions.
The dissolution, of real and artificial memory, tend to put such associations into automatic relay systems, where they resemble human unconscious states, very similar to dysfunctional states of disassociation.
The difference is, obvious: artificial memory never forgets as a human brain does, it can re-evoke and reconstruct the relay systems without any lapse , whereas .human intelligence can permanently disable the channels of connective neurons.
This is one overriding need for quantum computation, since to develop a sense of thought, a qualitative complexity has to be part of the program.
Even as these processes are only partially inclusive in various systems, by systemic multivarient functional equivalents need to calculate increasingly numerous bits of data, leading to increasing functional utilization of automatic systems.
Hence the syntaxes will be more functionally derive toward automatic thinking and shift considerations of general qualitative criteria into the lower recesses of the mind,
Therfore in terms of the left and right lobes, more quantitative functions of general concerns will be handled on presumed memory phases.
Eventually, very little of that will lend to recall, and presumptions will need to be ascertained as part and parcel of learning in general.