Schizoids

Inability to compensate for feelings of inferiority.


Dependence on others for one’s self-worth. [size=80][ MANifesto: Specialization – Compensations – Dependence][/size]
Specialization cultivates the desire to be validated by others. An individual’s ‘value’ being determined by a collective – usually a fraternity of peers (colleagues) belonging to the same specialization, or the same race and/or ethnicity.


Inferiority may cause resentment, seeking retribution and relief through an allegiance with the enemy of those exemplifying the root of the individual’s resentment.
Inferiority is evident in liberalism, expressed as an admiration for anything foreign and contrary to the individual’s own in-group – xenophilia concealing Oikophobia.

In the aforementioned Inferiority Complex, and Scruton’s coinage of the term Oikophobia, we find the symptoms of western man’s self-destructive, cultural suicidal policies, as well as the psychological underpinnings of liberalism and Marxism.

What of the shizoid manimal, that hasn’t fully evolved into a human?
Unable to contribute anything useful to the human sphere of interests it dedicates its life to shitting & pissing in every corner where humans congregate - like a malcontent pet that wants the master to pay attention to it and doesn’t know how, other than nipping at his heals or soiling his home.
A common theme among manimals, this inability to be noticed reverting to such crude methods to draw attention to themselves - like a child that hasn’t matured wetting its bed, or breaking stuff to receive parental attention.

Without intending it, a variance of Schizoid degeneracy - spiteful mutant - rejects free-will, to absolve itself and its parental heritage, of all culpability that would contradict the inflated image it has constructed for its ego, and simultaneously accuses another, e.g., world, system, humanity etc., of being responsible for what it has brought down upon itself.
the double-stadard protects the ego from self-awarness - contradicting the comforting image it has fabricated to protects its own ego from a corrective prick that will release all the hot air in a sudden burst of flatulence.
A shizoid conundrum that if exposed forces it to perform some impressive verbal acrobatics or retreat back to cynicism and dismissive humour.
Its mind is fractured & fragmented - compartmentalized - so as to apply one set of beliefs in one context and another in another context, without the two ever causing any distress in its psyche - no shame, no integrity, since both necessitate integrity and mental cohesion.
Compartmentalization also separates subjective emotionalism from objective rationalism, allowing the more primal former to usurp the more uncultivated latter.
This is clear in minds that deny any degree of their own will’s agency while remaining fanatical Abrahamics or Marxists, rebelling against what, precisely?
Fate?
No that would require some degree of integrity.
Rebelling against individuals running a system which they claim have no agency?
Rebelling against god’s law, or natural law? The two are synonymous in such creatures - religious and secular nihilism.

We may speculate that the method is adopted for its win-win applictions. The individual absolves itself of all responsibility while, at the same time, projecting this responsibility on some nefarious or vague otherness - if not institutions then god, or comic order. This ‘evil exploitive’ authoritarian’ other, is given a name: Capitalist, Nazi, God, System, Institution, state and so on.
This entity is an agency with a choice, whereas the victim of its agency, does not. Its utility is as a scapegoat…soemone to blame for all the unforeseen negative consequences of its own judgments and choices.
Scapegoating is one of the benefits of Abrahamism and so few can ever let go of it.
This is the formula of eternal victimhood, ingrained in the psyche of recovering, or not, Abrahamics - theist and atheist alike, the basic psychological utility of Abraham’s one-god still remains, whichever name is given to it.
When discovered they may, reluctantly, conceded that nobody is responsible for anything, since nobody - according to their nihilistic world-view - has a choice, a will, free from cosmic order - necessity, and since nobody is ever at liberty to do anything contrary to what has been determined they are rebelling against what, exactly?
Fate…their ‘bad luck’, as they call it.
This fatalism may find relief through this self-referential logic that they are fated to rebel against fate itself - or against reality, the world and how it is; against god or universal order, as it has been renamed.
An anti-nature, anti-life, stance they cannot fully admit - because of the personal implications - and so they intuitively adopt cynical narcissism as their preferred defensive posture - the former laughing away at the paradox they’ve linguistically created - or adopted because such minds lack creativity - but cannot abandon. They deal with it with ideas concerning the world’s mysteriousness, or man’s ignorance. They do not abandon the world’s knowability, its order, but only man’s ability to make sense of it - an indirect way of admitting their own inability to rationalize their self-contradicting delusions.
The implication is that they may not be able to explain their double-stadnards - dismissing psychological subconscious motives - but someone at some future time will.
For the moment they remain steadfast in their faith that their own paradoxes will be clarified in some future time.
The future is key here, because nihilists - attracting all sorts of desperate degenerates - live in an imminent future utopianism. No past, but only a present and a positive future. the future must always remain positive, to counterbalance their negative present. Past is dismissed or selectively acknowledged.
They may be living in delusion and self-deceit now, but in the future their present self-deciet and delusions will be rationalized - discovered to be ahead of their time. And all this is also determined - fated.
It cannot be any other way.
This fantasy comforts them and empowers them to remain fixed in their methods of self-absolution, reconstructing Abrahamic good vs evil in updated ways so as to not be affected by Nietzsche’s’ critique of Christianity, that carries through to Islam and Judaism, but also Marxism and Postmodernism.
It helps them cope…until death makes their coping ends.

Upon what grounding do these amoral schizoids base their demand that we adopt their emotionally based thinking?
Can’t be in reference to objective reality, which they reject; can’t be on an ethical system, or a evolved moral impulse, which they also reject as another social fabrication expressing power; can’t be a willful, totalitarian, authoritarian agency, named god.
So, how are were to determine that Nazis are baddies, and all the rest of the subjective emoters, are not?
Declarations?

Why is Nazi, or exploitative Capitalist, or authoritarian Objectivist, even an insult, if all is determined and nothing could have ever been otherwise?
On what bases ought we to pay for Mary Land’s abortions, in a no god, no morality reality?

Who, here, has agency that can be changed by shaming them?

Are they bragging that they’ve been selected to know what nobody can ever know, or that they’ve been chosen to awaken humanity about its impotence?
Are these the true chosen ones that speak on behalf of cosmic determining order, that shall not be named ‘god’?
Have they been blessed to know something that can never be disproven in the future?

If I can never know what I do not know, does this negate what I do know?
Ha!!!

If everything I think i know can be proven wrong then why know at all?
Is everything I know wrong because I do not know what I do not know, or because in the future it will all be proven wrong?
Then everything and nothing is justifiable.

How do we even have computers? Why are we even able to live?
What is the deciding factor?

If all is determined and life has no agency - no choice - then why evolve judgment at all?
How did judgment evolve?
Why did it evolve when it is fake?

Is natural selection debunked?
Who is ‘selecting’? What is being selected if all is already determined?
How and why did selecting even become available if it is illusory? Why did it evolve, along with judgement?

What does that leave us?
Creationism by any other name?
Ha!!
Recovering Abrahamics…
You gotta love them. The are trying. Desperately.
Ironically, the same judgment that lead them to Abrahamic and then Marxism and then Postmodernism,

Lorikeet.

I’m going to make this very simple to you and I want you to attempt to understand.

You’ve never been to hell.

You feel like you’re not one of the cool kids.

The irony is, the cool kids are trying not to let you see hell.

And you hate them.

You feel left out.

ALL of your posting is a child who had parents put plug protectors on electrical outlets so you couldn’t electricity yourself as an infant. And then get mad at them for not letting you be one of the cool kids.

The Jews believe their one-god, of multiplicities, is both good and evil, allowing them to justify anything they do as the will of god.
We can understand why these Jews swarmed to Nietzsche and his Beyond Good & Evil anti-Christianity.
Currently they’ve duped Christians into believing their Demiourgos is the same as the Christian benevolent god of love.

But let’s adopt the gullible Christian’s description of a benevolent, all-loving, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, absolute being.
If it is so, then all this suffering is part of its sadistic, masochistic nature…exposing it as the Jew god, after all.
And if he knows the outcome and still persists in allowing events to proceed uninterrupted, leading to more suffering, then its sadomasochism would be closer to Nazism.
If the Jew one-god enjoys suffering, for its own sake, then were the Nazi’s the real ‘chosen ones’? Were they divine agencies of divine will?

Do Zionists admire Nazis because they taught their fellow Orthodox Jews a lesson?
Had they strayed, and was Hitler the agency of the Jew-god’s vengeful corrective sado-masochism?
Is this why they emulate them?
Is this why Nietzsche was so seductive to them?

But…but…how could anything and anyone stray when god’s will is omnipotent and all-determining?
Ah…another ploy.
He chose both sides to increase the pain and suffering. He enjoyed it.
And if he enjoyed it, is he truly perfect?
To enjoy is to lack and have this lack fulfilled. To lack is to be imperfect.

A crock of horseshit it is.
But it isn’t gone, is it?
It survives under a different guise.
It lingers on, over the ages.
As long as there are spiteful mutants, and desperate degenerates, it will never die - it will live on, as if it were immortal.

Now that we’ve adopted the schizoid debunking of natural selection, and accepted the ‘fact’ that all is determined, making judgement and choice a superfluous inconsequential factor we must justify, let us proceed to unravel this sadomasochistic film that never ends, and constantly repeats.
Presumably, it is not pleasure but pain and suffering that is the core of existing, in such a reality.
So, pursuing pleasure would be a sin - anti god’s will. This is made clear in Abrahamic asceticism.
Suffering for its own sake, would be divine. It gives god pleasure…or it is what has been determined.
Jihadi martyrs rejoice.

Nothing is being selected, and the lie of choice is another way suffering increases.
Quite a sadistic twit this one-god is…or, such a masochistic state existence is, evolving life only because it can suffer, and by suffering fulfill its determinations.
Why else would we evolve the ‘illusion’ of will, when we have none?
Self-hate reaches its apex. We must resent ourselves for being nothing more than illusory agencies of pain and suffering…the entire cosmos centred around its experience.

See why these dimwits had to be given a Paradise - in some beyond - or a Utopia, in the forever imminent future?
Pleasure principle.
Carrot to the stick.

And now they are told they must will its continuous return.
The suffering never ends.
See why Buddhism developed this idea of not being born again?
Nihilism’s linguistic inversions lead to paradoxes that non-existence can hope to resolve.
They worship the nil…as I’ve said.
Self-gratifying lies are confronted with cosmic paradoxes.

This is why most are uninvested in anything beyond their lifetime, and are cynical to the bone.
Their narcissism is an exaltation of their awareness and acceptance of their own impotence…which they must pretend to want to relive eternally, proving that they are living their ideal life…the life that has been determined for them.
A slave feeling superior to other slaves because it is convinced there is no escape, and no world outside the fencing.
It laughs at those who still believe in freedom. It has accepted its lot…surrendered to its fate, and can only scream at those that have been lucky enough to have been aloted a better fate.
The chosen ones.

As I’ve repeated many times before…nihilism is linguistic.
Language is its root, and in language we should seek our release.

Words…and how they are defined - collectively, conventionally, or not - is the root of the problem.
It is where semiotic matrices begin to entangle our mind.

How to escape?
Back to basic.
Simplicity.
Return words to their original utility of being mediators - connectors - between an ideal and the real - a thought and an action.
Place action before thought - inverting nihilism’s inversions.

When you’re fighting the demons in your head, you imagine them ferocious and formidable, but you still diminish them to a manageable level, so that they remain well within your power to vanquish them.

What is going on here?
ILPers independently aligning with the status quo.

Magical.

How do ants and bees remain cohesive and behave in uniform ways, with no authority directing their every move?

schizoid psychotic:
A mind that can hold two or more contradictory positions without suffering any apparent effects - the effects are internalized and may emerge as a number of psychological issues, fetishes, or mind/body dissonance.
The double-stadard is how they maintain their self-serving, self-comforting, intersubjectivity.
In this way their absolutism can outsource their own guilt…accusing others of not living up to THEIR values, to conceal their own failures.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA5GV-XmwtM[/youtube]

If metaphysics is not anchored to physics, the mind must resort to magical thinking: obscurantism; self-contradictions glossed over with mystifying prose; compartmentalization, i.e., newspeak; mind/body schisms/dissonance, always siding with the mind (divinity); semiotics with no referents outside the minds of those sharing their shared (conventional) understanding.

Two basic forms of representation - art.

—A reference to what is perceived - the present.
Wha its perceived restricting the artist’s expression.
Masculine.

—A projection of what one feels towards what is perceived.
Art becomes a amalgamation of the perceived and the artist’s own reactinos…until the perceives is no longer necessary and all that is created is the artist’s reactions to what is present.
No restrictions to what the artist feels, relative to what is present, projecting it outward.
The projection becomes preferable to the perceived - it usurps the will-less with a willful reaction.
The artist can now create what does not exist - what cannot exist…presenting it as better than what actually exists.
Feminine.

Magic = synthesis of symbols/words that can affect midns…power.
Vulnerable minds are those that react negatively to what exists. They are susceptible to magical spells - susceptible to artistic suggestions.

Magic exists lorikeet. Like I’ve told you before….

You don’t see spirit. You’re blind. Everything is spirit.

You’re trolling yourself. Some where inside of you, you know this.

An example of the Abrahamic psychosis.

Here “spirit” is converted form a synthesis of mind/body, creating an energy aura - range of interactivity/effect - into a magical, mystical, cosmic consciousness.
‘Deus,’ according to the other Jew Spinoza.

Nature did not suffice…or the irrational had to be Trojan Horsed into a rational possibility by synthetizing it into a singular concept.

Using the term ‘spirit’ desperate degenerates can imply anything they cannot prove, nor rationally justify.
A method to convert the irrational into a rational topic to be reasoned.

In art a artists captured the spirit of a scene when he can convert ambience into form and clolour…or rhythms and tempos.
All is energy after all.

An energy field of effect, is its aura, or its spirit…resonating at a specific rhythm/tempo.
We experience this intuitively, unable to pinpoint the source - through the body and its constant interactions with the environment.