a new church

Yes, you’re the only scientist here. Sounds a bit narcissistic if you ask me. I guess all of those scientists in labs and working the telescopes of which you don’t have are wrong.

I don’t need a mirror, I have self-reflected enough. My mind is open, when the evidence is provided to change it.

Oh, I don’t believe everything they say. I just think there is good evidence to support that the big bang happened. I don’t disagree with mainstream science becoming egotistical, as religion has always been.

Yes, it’s definitely magic thinking to question the possibilities, both past and future tense.

Past - Tesla’s idea’s

Future - Where we could be with his idea’s.

Note that I didn’t ask you … and for REASON.
Nullius in Verba.

You don’t have to ask me, you demonstrated it on your own. By claiming you’re the only scientist here.

So that’s your proof of the big bang being a hoax and mainstream science not being credible? Take nobodies word for it?

turtle,

What do you think about submitting to God or submitting to reason?

There are fundamental approaches to solving the problems of life. One is to consult holy books and use the interpretations as guides. The other approach is to ignore holy books and rely on reasoning. Reasoning requires imagining a future state and analyzing its value. Something Artimas and Turtle are unwilling/unable to do.

There is no method in this madness.

Yes, unable to do it definitely. The majority are all the same. When new is provided. “This won’t work!” Even when it has never been tried.

Just nonsense. Based on the wrong idea that you are the only one who has evaluated his proposals.

phyllo,

Of course I rely on reasoning, and I am sure turtle and Artimas do as well. But I think reasoning ultimately submits to human passion.

You know the line from Hume: “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.”

I also deign to propose that there is a method in ALL madness.

Yes, it’s non sense to think that we could harvest near unlimited energy from natural methods. Indeed, non sense. Nothing I haven’t heard before.

You do realize there is no genius without a touch of madness, right?

The fact is, that such effort is what spawned the religions in the first place.

“Ahdam” literally means “a dam for the free chaotic flow of efforts”, a “stopping of the arguing”.

In what way does it or should it submit to passions?

Some madness is without reason.

You have to provide a reason why something should be tried. We are not lab rats to be used for your ill considered experiments.

There should be a reason provided for why we should use a better method of harvesting energy to be distributed equally among the people of the world, as the world is everyone’s not simply those who can ‘afford’ it. Doing so is an ill experiment?

If you can’t see the reason just by looking at the reality we live, that says enough on it’s own.

Tesla spend a great deal of money and only managed to illuminate one light bulb. The entire concept has been shown to be impractical.

It is interesting that the same person who professes common pop-science as “facts” also professes that Telsa energy schemes are viable, despite that same pop-science preaching.

Seriously guy, what are you even on about anymore?

Yep, and the world’s flat.

Say’s the guy who denied the mathematics and evidence of the Fibonacci.

artimas why have you gone off on this tangent…why don’t you stick with the new place…help me out…are you with me or not…

I just can’t stand when people spout ignorance is all… It just gets me. I’m all for helping create a new idea, but how will it help create a new and better reality if the people remain so uninformed/misinformed?

Ignorance is the beginning of negative, buying into misinformation is the next.