Are AI and robotics leading us to self-destruction?

Just for funzies, today I asked ChatGPT to create a visual depiction of the self-destructive idiocy of humans (like Elon Musk, for example) wanting AI and robots to do our work for us.

Here is that conversation…

Me:
Please generate an image (either realistic or cartoonish) that visually demonstrates the harsh existential problem of how humans will no longer be able to earn a living if all jobs are taken over by AI and robots.

ChatGPT:
Here’s the image depicting a dystopian future where AI and robots have taken over all jobs, leaving humans struggling for work. Let me know if you want any modifications!

Me:
That’s good, but it needs to be more dire from the human perspective. For instance, you seem to have depicted them as still being able to afford cell phones, however, if they have no jobs, they won’t even be able to afford food, clothing, or housing. Can you make an AI takeover of jobs seem even more desperate and dystopian for the humans?

ChatGPT:
Here’s a more intense and dire depiction of a dystopian AI takeover, showing humans in extreme poverty, scavenging for food while robots control the world. Let me know if you want any further refinements!

Me:
That’s better, but can you somehow better show how the reason for that extreme poverty is because of the robots and AI taking over the jobs? (Btw, thank you for your efforts.)

ChatGPT:
I wasn’t able to generate that image because it didn’t follow content policy. If you’d like, I can adjust the concept to still show the struggle of humans in a world dominated by AI, but in a way that aligns with the guidelines. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!

Me:
Do whatever you need to do to stay within your guidelines.

ChatGPT:
Here’s a revised version that stays within the guidelines while still illustrating the struggle of humans in a world where AI and robots have taken over jobs. Let me know if you’d like any further tweaks!

Me:
Can you change the signage on the buildings to say something like “let AI and robots do the work for you” and combine that with the earlier image of starving humans?

ChatGPT:
I wasn’t able to generate that image because it didn’t follow content policy. I can adjust the concept to still show the contrast between AI-driven prosperity and human struggle in a way that aligns with the guidelines. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!

Me:
Again, do whatever you need to do to stay within your guidelines (though I’m having trouble understanding why this is a problem?).

ChatGPT:
Here’s a revised version that aligns with the guidelines while still highlighting the growing divide between AI prosperity and human struggle. Let me know if you’d like any further adjustments!

Me:
Please correct the grammar on the signage and show humans scavenging for food like in one of your earlier depictions.

ChatGPT:
Here’s an improved version with grammatically correct signage and humans scavenging for food, emphasizing the contrast between AI-driven prosperity and human desperation. Let me know if you’d like any further adjustments!

Me:
That’s nearly perfect. Keep everything the same but just replace the misspelled wording in the large billboard to read “Let AI and robots do the work for you” (please make sure the spelling is correct).

ChatGPT:
Here’s the final version with the corrected billboard text while keeping everything else the same. Let me know if you need any more refinements!

After realizing that I probably needed a paid subscription to a higher version of ChatGPT to resolve those spelling issues :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:, I thanked Chat for its efforts and the conversation ended.

Anyway,…

(and setting aside the magic [and drawbacks] of using the free version of ChatGPT)

…the whole point of the project was to create a visual representation of how socially self-destructive it is to think that it is a good idea for AI and robots to slowly but surely takeover our jobs when absolutely no one other than the billionaire/trillionaire owners of the robots would benefit from it.

What do you guys think?

(P.S., the irony is not lost on me that I used AI to do the above work for me. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:)

I’m loving AI.
I find it very useful

I too find it very useful, however, that’s not the point of the OP.

Would you still find AI and robotics useful if they took away your ways and means for making a living?

And if you think such a possibility is far-fetched, just look at the cold-hearted way in which the billionaire Elon Musk (the champion of AI and robotics) so easily and unempathetically takes people’s livelihoods away for the sake of “efficiency.”

WHooo.
The evil “They” have been involked.
That fact is that smart people are using AI to enhance their own “ways and means” to make a living.
Like all tools from the moment that Homo Habilis first cracked a rock to make a sharp edge to make meat easier to eat, AI is also a tool that is going to more efficiently promote ways and means.
Did that tool create problems ? Did Hhab ever cut their finger. Did they ever get a stone ship in the eye, sure. But that genus of Homonin went on the proliferaate and colonise the entire world.

Being “smart” does not necessarily mean being “wise” or “empathetic” regarding how one’s ways and means of making a living affects others.

You keep missing the point of the OP.

The question is, is it “wise” to create tools (robotics) that eliminate jobs that humans can do (need to do) in order to earn a living?

For example, according to Google’s AI Overview…

A study suggests that there are approximately 17.78 million taxi drivers worldwide.

…so that’s almost 18 million wage-earning jobs that the cold-hearted and blindingly rich nazi, Elon Musk, is more than happy to see his self-driving vehicles eliminate.

What’s next, truck drivers?

Again, it’s not a question of whether or not AI can be amazing and useful to humans, no, it’s a question of the potential problem of robotics becoming so advanced and so much more “efficient” than humans that the rich and powerful owners of industries will be too tempted to replace humans with robots.

Which, in itself, implies yet another problem, for if humans have no means of earning money, then no one will be able to purchase whatever it is that the industries are now more efficiently manufacturing using robotics.

Anyway, this is all just speculation in the hope of preventing this…

However, perhaps AI will become so advanced that it will provide us with a solution to what that image portends.

Or maybe the solution was already foretold in this old Charlton Heston movie…

:upside_down_face:

See post above ^^^

No the question, as absurd as it is, is “ARE AI and robotics leading us to self destruction”. And that is the mantra of all Luddites or Sabbateurs since long before the words were invented.

It is neither AI nor is it Robots that are taking over the world. THey are both labour saving devices and it is humans that are the destructive force, and a firce for good.
AI is a great tool. It’s been invented and it shal not be uninvernted, any mare than humans will down tools and return to the forest and eat fruit and roots.

Or as CHatGPT would put it…

"No, the real quesThe fundamental question, despite its seemingly exaggerated premise, is whether artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are leading humanity toward self-destruction. This concern has long been echoed by skeptics and critics of technological advancement, even before such terminology existed.

However, neither AI nor robotics are autonomous agents of global domination; rather, they function as labor-saving tools designed to enhance human productivity. The true force behind both progress and destruction remains humanity itself.

AI represents a significant technological innovation. Once a technology is developed, it is unlikely to be reversed—just as human civilization will not voluntarily abandon modern advancements to revert to a pre-industrial state of subsistence living.tion—absurd as it may seem—is whether AI and robotics are leading us to self-destruction. This has been the rallying cry of Luddites and saboteurs long before such terms even existed.

AI and robots are not taking over the world; they are merely labor-saving tools. It is humans who wield both the power to create and destroy.

AI is a remarkable tool. Now that it has been invented, it cannot be undone—just as humanity will not simply abandon technology to return to the wilderness, surviving on fruit and roots.

I saw Soylent Green when it first came out.
It was, and remains fiction

You would have a good point there if it wasn’t for the fact that self-driving vehicles are literally designed to take jobs away from humans.

And if you’re going to bring ChatGPT into the conversation, then by all means, let’s bring it into the conversation.

I asked Chat the following (emphasis mine)…

Me:
Is it possible that self-driving cars could replace taxis?

ChatGPT:
Yes, it’s very possible that self-driving cars could replace traditional taxis, at least in some areas. Companies like Waymo, Cruise, and Tesla are already testing or deploying autonomous ride-hailing services. The benefits of self-driving taxis include lower operational costs (no driver salaries), increased efficiency, and potentially safer roads due to reduced human error.

However, challenges remain, such as:

  • Technology Limitations: Self-driving cars still struggle with unpredictable situations, bad weather, and complex city environments.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Many cities and governments have strict rules on autonomous vehicles, which could slow adoption.
  • Public Acceptance: Many people are still hesitant to trust fully autonomous vehicles.
  • Job Displacement: Taxi and ride-hailing drivers would be affected, leading to economic and social concerns.

Me:
I am more concerned with this: “Job Displacement: Taxi and ride-hailing drivers would be affected, leading to economic and social concerns.” Doesn’t this suggest that (potentially) millions of sources of human livelihoods could be lost to driverless vehicles?

ChatGPT:
Yes, absolutely. The rise of self-driving taxis could lead to significant job displacement for millions of drivers worldwide, including taxi drivers, ride-hailing drivers (Uber, Lyft), and even truck drivers as autonomous technology expands to freight transport.

The Scale of the Problem

  • In the U.S. alone, there are around 1.7 million taxi and ride-hailing drivers.
  • Globally, millions of people rely on driving as their primary source of income, particularly in countries where ride-hailing services provide economic opportunities for those without other stable employment.
  • Truck driving is another sector at risk, with over 3.5 million truck drivers in the U.S. alone.

Economic and Social Consequences

  1. Mass Unemployment & Economic Hardship
    Many drivers rely on their jobs to support families. A sudden transition to autonomous vehicles could leave them struggling to find alternative employment, especially those without other skills or education.
  2. Increased Wealth Inequality
    The companies deploying self-driving cars (such as Tesla, Waymo, and Cruise) stand to benefit financially, but wealth may concentrate at the top, leaving displaced drivers without a safety net.
  3. Resistance & Protests
    We’ve already seen protests against automation in various industries. Similar pushback is likely if self-driving taxis threaten millions of jobs without offering alternative employment solutions.

Anyway, the point is that according to ChatGPT (and to common sense) your “Luddite” reference does not apply in this situation.

And would you please stop with this stupid crap of you thinking or implying that I don’t believe that AI is a “great tool.” Of course it’s a great tool, but, again, that’s not the point of the OP, of which Chat seems to be in agreement with.

ALL technology from the first stone tool is designed as a labour savind device.
Without exception.
The problem in not in the tech, but the society not wishing to share the benefits.
So you can complain all you like.
If you are successful and get AI and robotics banned, say, in the USA, then the rest of the world is going to walk all over you.
Now think.
If a tool saves labour, then this frees people to do other things, be that more leisure, other work, holidays etc.
Would you live without a washing machine? WOuld you prefer to hire a drdge to hand wash all your clothes for you? Maybe you would prefer to do it all yourself. Maybe you would prefer to rub stick together to make fire?
You can so that right now. What are you waiting for ?7

Right now, millions of people drive for a living—truck drivers, taxi drivers, delivery drivers, bus drivers. These jobs take up a lot of time and can be repetitive, tiring, and even dangerous.

Self-driving cars aim to automate this work. Instead of a person sitting behind the wheel all day, an advanced computer system does the driving. This means:
:white_check_mark: Fewer people needed for boring, repetitive driving jobs
:white_check_mark: Those workers can shift to more interesting or creative jobs—like designing, maintaining, or managing the self-driving systems, or moving into fields like healthcare, engineering, or the arts
:white_check_mark: The economy can grow as people focus on higher-value work, rather than just moving things and people from A to B

Think of it like when machines replaced factory workers for repetitive tasks—those workers didn’t just disappear; they moved on to better, more skilled work.

Would you rather spend all day driving in traffic or do something more engaging?

Stop being so short-sighted with this issue and try to look into the future.

I, again, took this up with ChatGPT (and again, emphasis mine)…

Me:
As we can imagine the exponential advancements that could potentially take place in the fields of AI and robotics, say, in the next 10,000 years, would you please provide an extensive list of the jobs that might be replaced by robots that are presently being performed by humans.

ChatGPT:
Over the next 10,000 years, AI and robotics could advance to unimaginable levels, potentially replacing most, if not all, human jobs. Below is an extensive list of jobs that could be automated, categorized by industry:

1. Manufacturing & Industrial Jobs

  • Assembly line workers
  • Factory machine operators
  • Quality control inspectors
  • Warehouse workers
  • Packing and sorting personnel
  • Textile and garment workers
  • Welders and metal fabricators
  • Chemical plant operators

2. Transportation & Logistics

  • Truck drivers
  • Delivery drivers
  • Taxi and ride-share drivers
  • Airline pilots
  • Ship captains and deck officers
  • Train conductors
  • Traffic controllers
  • Parking lot attendants
  • Couriers and mail carriers

3. Retail & Customer Service

  • Cashiers
  • Sales representatives
  • Store clerks
  • Shelf stockers
  • Call center agents
  • Technical support specialists
  • Receptionists
  • Fast food workers

4. Healthcare & Medical Services

  • Radiologists
  • Pathologists
  • Pharmacists
  • Medical transcriptionists
  • Lab technicians
  • Dental hygienists
  • Physical therapy assistants
  • Elderly caregivers
  • Nurses (partially or fully)
  • Surgeons (robotic precision surgery)

5. Food & Hospitality

  • Chefs and cooks (automated food preparation)
  • Bartenders
  • Waiters and servers
  • Hotel front desk clerks
  • Housekeepers and janitors
  • Dishwashers

6. Construction & Skilled Trades

  • Bricklayers and masons
  • Carpenters
  • Electricians
  • Plumbers
  • Painters
  • Roofers
  • Heavy equipment operators

7. Office & Administrative Work

  • Data entry clerks
  • Accountants and auditors
  • Bookkeepers
  • Secretaries and personal assistants
  • Human resources personnel
  • Market researchers
  • Paralegals
  • Legal assistants

8. Education & Learning

  • Tutors
  • Teachers and professors (AI-led adaptive learning)
  • School counselors
  • Librarians

9. Creative & Entertainment

  • Writers and journalists (AI-generated content)
  • Artists and designers
  • Musicians and composers
  • Actors (AI-generated performances)
  • Game developers
  • Film editors and animators

10. Science & Research

  • Laboratory researchers
  • Data scientists
  • Mathematicians
  • Astronomers (automated space exploration)
  • Biologists (AI-driven genetic research)

11. Law Enforcement & Security

  • Security guards
  • Police officers (AI-based surveillance and robotic patrols)
  • Detectives
  • Border control agents
  • Military personnel

12. Farming & Agriculture

  • Farmers and farmworkers
  • Fishermen
  • Animal breeders
  • Food inspectors

13. Personal Services

  • Hairdressers and barbers
  • Personal trainers
  • Fitness instructors
  • Therapists (AI-driven mental health bots)
  • Clergy and spiritual guides

14. Space Exploration & Colonization

  • Astronauts (replaced by AI probes and robots)
  • Terraforming specialists
  • Space station operators

15. Government & Bureaucracy

  • Tax auditors
  • Policy analysts
  • Bureaucratic clerks

16. Engineering & Technical Work

  • Civil engineers
  • Software developers
  • IT technicians
  • Network administrators
  • Mechanical engineers

17. Media & Communication

  • News anchors
  • Public relations specialists
  • Advertisers
  • Translators and interpreters

18. Social Work & Humanitarian Services

  • Social workers
  • Counselors
  • NGO workers

Given that AI and robotics could evolve to handle creative, ethical, and decision-making roles, even high-level jobs such as politicians, CEOs, and scientists could eventually be replaced.

Would you like me to explore potential new jobs that might emerge in response to these changes?

Me:
Yes, do explore the potential new jobs that might emerge in response to those changes, but only list the new jobs that cannot also be performed by advanced robots. In other words, list the jobs that can only be done by humans because they would be impossible for advanced robots to do.

ChatGPT:
As AI and robotics take over most traditional jobs, humans may still hold roles that require deep emotional intelligence, subjective experiences, creativity beyond pattern recognition, and existential exploration. Below is a list of jobs that might remain uniquely human because they rely on qualities robots could never fully replicate.

1. Philosophical & Existential Professions

  • Philosophers & Ethical Thinkers – Contemplating the nature of consciousness, reality, and morality in ways beyond algorithmic reasoning.
  • Spiritual Leaders & Gurus – Offering guidance based on deeply personal and subjective experiences of faith, enlightenment, or inner growth.
  • Human Experience Chroniclers – Recording the firsthand, subjective human experience in ways that AI cannot “feel” or “live through.”

2. Human Connection & Emotional Professions

  • Empathy Coaches & Emotional Mentors – Helping others develop and navigate emotions in ways AI cannot experience.
  • Genuine Human Companions – Providing deep, spontaneous, and unpredictable companionship beyond programmed responses.
  • True Storytellers & Memory Keepers – Sharing firsthand lived experiences, rather than AI-synthesized narratives.

3. Experience-Based & Sensory Professions

  • Adventurers & Pioneers – Exploring new frontiers (space, deep oceans, extreme environments) where human intuition is essential.
  • Cultural Ritual Keepers – Preserving and performing cultural traditions in ways rooted in human heritage.
  • Authentic Sensory Artists – Creating art from human senses, emotions, and imperfections that AI cannot truly “feel” or experience.

4. Advocacy & Human Rights

  • Human Rights Defenders – Protecting and advocating for human dignity in ways that require personal conviction and lived experience.
  • Resistance Leaders – Organizing movements against oppressive AI governance or unethical robotic control.
  • Moral Companions – Ensuring human voices remain essential in decision-making regarding ethics, freedom, and identity.

5. Purely Irrational & Spontaneous Roles

  • Chaos Agents – Embracing unpredictability, creativity, and randomness in ways AI, which is bound by logic, cannot fully replicate.
  • Performance Pranksters – Engaging in spontaneous, human-centered humor and absurdity that isn’t predictable or replicable by AI.
  • Unscripted Life Coaches – Teaching people how to embrace uncertainty, chance, and spontaneous decision-making.

In essence, the jobs that will remain human-exclusive will be those that depend on the irrational, the deeply emotional, the subjective, and the unquantifiable aspects of existence.

Me:
Okay. Now take into consideration the extensive list of jobs that you provided in your first answer. We’re talking about the jobs that humans once performed in order to earn money so that they could pay for food, clothing, and housing, etc., but have now been taken over by advanced robots. Next, take into consideration how many more humans will be added (in the next 10,000 years) to the approximately 8 billion that presently exist on earth, and then tell me if you think that those “human-exclusive” jobs you listed in your second answer (the ones that depend on the “…irrational, the deeply emotional, the subjective, and the unquantifiable aspects of existence…”) will be plentiful enough to provide the vast number of future humans with the ways and means of earning the money they will need to, again, purchase food, clothing, housing, and whatever else they may need to survive and prosper?

ChatGPT:
No, those “human-exclusive” jobs would not be plentiful enough to provide a vast future human population with the means to earn money for food, clothing, housing, and other necessities. The reason is simple: the vast majority of traditional jobs that currently sustain billions of people will be gone, and the small number of roles that remain human-exclusive will not scale to support everyone financially.

The Core Problem: Economic Displacement at an Unprecedented Scale

  1. Massive Job Loss Across All Sectors – With AI and robotics automating almost everything, there will be a dramatic decline in wage-based employment opportunities.
  2. Extreme Population Growth – Even if population growth slows, billions more people will exist, making human-exclusive jobs even more scarce and competitive.
  3. Limited Demand for “Human-Exclusive” Jobs – Not everyone can be a philosopher, spiritual guide, or emotional mentor, and those roles do not generate enough economic value to sustain billions of people.

The Collapse of the Money-Based Economy

If machines take over nearly all labor and production, why would money still be necessary? If there are no jobs, there is no income, and without income, people cannot buy necessities—unless the entire economic system fundamentally changes.

Possible Solutions for Human Survival in a Fully Automated Future

1. Post-Scarcity Society (Resource-Based Economy)

  • With robots producing everything (food, clothing, housing, goods), money may become obsolete.
  • Goods and services could be distributed based on need rather than purchase power.
  • A shift toward a system like Jacque Fresco’s Venus Project—where AI manages resources for the collective good—could replace capitalism.

2. Universal Basic Income (UBI) or Universal Resource Allocation

  • Governments (or AI-managed systems) provide all humans with a guaranteed income to cover basic needs, regardless of employment.
  • This allows people to pursue creative, philosophical, or emotional work without financial stress.

3. AI-Managed Governance & Economy

  • AI-driven systems could ensure fair distribution of resources, eliminating extreme wealth inequality.
  • Humans focus on leisure, creativity, and personal fulfillment rather than work-driven survival.

4. Redefining the Concept of “Work”

  • People may no longer need to “earn a living” in the traditional sense.
  • The pursuit of knowledge, self-improvement, and exploration could become the new “purpose” of humanity.

The Inevitable Conclusion: A Post-Work Society

If AI and robots handle all labor, traditional economic structures must change. There simply won’t be enough “human-exclusive” jobs to sustain the current economic system. Instead, humanity will need to transition into a post-scarcity civilization where survival is not tied to employment.

Me:
Would not your list of possible solutions be dependent upon the magnanimity and generosity of those who built, own, and control the robots? What if the owners were greedy, self-centered scoundrels who were only concerned with accumulating personal wealth?

ChatGPT:
Yes, you’ve hit on the central issue: who controls the machines controls the future of humanity. If AI and robots produce everything but remain in the hands of a small elite, then the outcome wouldn’t be a utopian post-scarcity society—it would be one of extreme inequality, suffering, and possibly even human extinction.

The Dark Scenario: A Wealthy Elite Hoarding Resources

If the people or corporations who own the robots are greedy, self-centered, and power-hungry, several dystopian possibilities emerge:

  1. Extreme Wealth Concentration – The elite class controls all AI and automation, owning the production of everything while billions of jobless people are left with nothing.
  2. Mass Unemployment & Poverty – Since robots do all the work, most people have no income, leading to mass suffering.
  3. Technocratic Authoritarianism – The wealthy ruling class, backed by AI-driven surveillance, prevents any revolt by the unemployed masses.
  4. Depopulation Policies – The elite may view billions of “useless” humans as a liability and enact policies to reduce the population, either through controlled means (e.g., limited resources, sterilization) or more brutal measures.
  5. Human Servitude to AI Owners – The masses could be forced into desperate conditions, becoming dependent on elite-controlled AI systems for mere survival.

Final Thought: The Crossroads of Human History

Humanity will eventually face two futures:

  1. A post-scarcity utopia, where AI and robots provide for all, eliminating poverty and creating a society of abundance.
  2. A dystopian nightmare, where a small ruling class owns AI, leaving billions in desperation or orchestrating mass depopulation.

Which future emerges depends entirely on who controls the AI. The window for ensuring AI benefits everyone, rather than just the elite, is rapidly closing.

xoxoxox

And that’s where my conversation with Chat ended, with that final hanging question: “… Which future emerges depends entirely on who controls the AI.…” wherein all one has to do is imagine the future still being plagued with Trumpian types, or Putin types, or Kim Jong Un types and you have your answer as to which future emerges.

No, that would be YOU doing that.
I’m looking ahead.

You might want to recognise the massive decline in population rate of growth that is going on right now. leading to an unsustainble level of old people.
I hope for and fully expect that humans will be free to think more about their lives with aid from technology. That the main impulse to reproduce now is to have children to look after them in their old age will terminate. This is true now, and old people who are already promoting a top heavy age pyramid are reliant on OTHER PEOPLE’s children to build the economy necessary to support old age. This cannot continue.
Within a decade AI and robotic services will be able to help here too.
This will mean that human population growth can lessen and even reverse.
I utterly welcome a reduction in human population. As this will be the only way to save the planet from destruction.
More automation; better more interesting jobs not even connected to the economy; better health care; safer roads.
What is needed is for the benefits of the new tech to be shared. The problem is not the tech, but greed. If it means one fat cat with all the money whilst the people cannot even afford to buy the tech, then the innovations are going to be wastes.
As is always the case. The problem is not the tech - which YOU CANNOT UNINVENT, but the access to that tech.

I’d have more respect for addressing your arguemnt if you did not rely so much on AI.

I already made it clear to you that I agreed with you about AI being a “great tool.”

Take, for example, that extensive list provided by ChatGPT of the jobs that could be lost to AI and advanced robotics.

It would be idiotic of me to spend days researching and combing through hard-to-find printed materials or sources spread-out over the Internet when I can simply get ChatGPT to do it for me in a matter of seconds.

So, again, a big thumbs up to AI.

However, you accused my speculative (question-asking) thread topic as being “absurd” and coming from a “Luddite” perspective…

Luddite
noun
1. derogatory
a person opposed to new technology or ways of working.
“a small-minded Luddite resisting progress”
2. historical
a member of any of the bands of English workers who destroyed machinery, especially in cotton and woolen mills that they believed was threatening their jobs.

…of which I agreed was a good point, except for the fact that now (and especially in the future) they (AI and robotics) truly are threatening our jobs as is witnessed in just this one tiny example alone…

“Cruise Rolls Out Driverless Taxis”

“Cruise first to cross finish line in California for driverless-taxi rollout”

“Autonomous taxis are officially a go in California, with Cruise scoring the first-ever commercial permit in the state.”

Does Waymo have a driverless taxi service?

AI Overview:
Yes, Waymo operates a fully autonomous, driverless taxi service called Waymo One, offering rides in select cities like Phoenix, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, with expansion to other areas planned.

Waymo’s driverless taxi service can now be accessed on Google Maps

Again, that is just one tiny (and existing) example…

(out of the millions of examples offered by ChatGPT)

…of how super-advanced AI and robotics…

(under the ownership and control of greedy, despotic, self-serving, power-hungry pieces of crap like Trump and Musk, or Kim Jong Un, for example)

…could be a “potential” and “real” risk to humanity, as was speculatively offered-up in this illustration created by Chat…

AI is in its infancy, and despite you wrongly labeling my thread as being nothing more than “Luddite” hysteria, I have nonetheless provided you with a very clear and existing example of how machines are indeed threatening our jobs.

Are you so naive as to believe that future money-grubbing elites wouldn’t take full advantage of AI, regardless of how it might negatively impact the rest of humanity?