Sir, you’ve been brainwashed by cartoons in your childhood.
You haven’t even read the Bible, have you? You’re watching all these lame ass YouTube videos. The real stuff is in the Bible. They don’t even get around to monogamy until the church age. Before that, the best you’re gonna get is “multiply wives and you multiply problems“. That’s a paraphrase.
She was prolly hearing all variety of NO out your very loud mouth, just a guess.
I left off on post 714 out of 735. I’m not sure I’ll get caught up on this.
If a male is not attentive to the female, even if not forcing her, he can cause pain. You have to already know that. Strike one, I’m prolly out of this convo… or was never in it.
You get a lot of attention when you’re being raped. What’s your point?
Most rapists don’t get caught here. Rape is like 50% of women. I know I can get away with it. I choose not to. Not just because of cosmic courts, but it really means something to me that mutual consent is the only thing that matters. And this is where I have to go into teaching mode… sigh human sexual selections are not consensual. So I have to step back and teach.
If the goal is just to be with someone, and not to cause pain, the kind of attention they need doesn’t ignore or appreciate signals of pain, but adjusts to them. Obviously, if it is being forced, there are going to be signals of emotional pain, even if it isn’t physical, and the offender ignores/appreciates them. And should have their dick chopped off and fed to them. out of respect for the dignity of their free will, of course, and concern over their personal growth.
At the end of the day Ichthus, I take on the burdens of things I’d never choose to do. I don’t rape people, I don’t murder people, I don’t torment or torture people. I don’t use the power of my mind on people.
Instead, I delegate it to those who were trespassed against. Now. Some people think I use psychological warfare. They just can’t hold all the things I know, when they see my teachings. Because they know they’re guilty of it.
I keep trying to explain to humans that I have no ulterior motive because I never wanted to be. Unfortunately, we never die. All of us face a reckoning. It’s not by god, it’s by the people we hurt. Spirit is real. I’ve seen TONS of people try to get out of it. Pleading that they’ve been converted to Jesus or whatnot. The same manipulation they used to lure in their prey, they use to try to get away with it.
I actually prefer no death penalty. The hell realms are much harder than the death penalty. I have lots of clout in existence because I survived the just because hell realm. I did nothing wrong, but I was sent there anyways for about 2 decades now.
It takes earnestness and a massive amount of intelligence to survive that hell realm. Like I said before, I’ve been debating omniscient beings for so long, who had my worst interest at heart, that I see humans as mere sims now in an RPG.
I know that’s rude to say, but I don’t know how to explain it better
I’ll add to my last reply. I defend people who partner although it’s evil and I would never do it.
But that’s not what I really wanted to say.
There are three hell realms.
1.) The synchronicity hell realms
2.) the external hell realms
3.) the internal hell realms.
I’ve survived all of them. So far. Now. I do understand most lives have never been to any hell realm.
I’d even add a fourth. Being mistaken for a horrible person when you’re not.
That’s the hell realm I was sent to. I was actually sent to all 4.
Do I have an ego about surviving all of that? No. I never wanted to be. Those are just states of being. I can answer all your questions though
I’m going to tell all of you the perfect online profile for dating with omniscience.
“I’m new to town. I’m new to computer dating sites, I don’t really understand them. I’m just looking for someone I can understand and someone who understands me as a partner.”
I don’t manipulate people. I would never post that on a dating app or site.
If I was interested in one night stands forever (which I am), I’d use variations of my dating profile on an online sight. I can do it in person too.
The irony is… if I wrote my real profile, no women would go for me.
" I just want one night stands forever"
I don’t need to get to know people to know them. People now are more cautious than ever. They need to get to know the person etc… etc… blah… blah… I already know the depths of your entire heart… An 80 year old woman is just child bait to me.
I’ll explain more about how men and women are borderlines to me.
You have to walk on eggshells around women to get them, and men threaten depression if they can’t get sex from women.
The men who actually kill themselves are not borderline. That’s 3 million men a year. Women do not want that blood on their hands, and yes I’m threatening people. You can arrest me if you want. I’ve never touched a person inappropriately. I’ve never even spoken to a person inappropriately.
These things matter.
I’m playing the smart game. Not being a player. You know who you are. And you know I’m watching you. Nobody in existence knows what my wrath actually is. I delegate wrath.
Hey remove my name from this thread please. I have vigilantes flattening my tires, punching holes in my rsdiator and knocking my bikes over because the state has told them I’m a child molester and given them my name and address. So i try to stay low key. Thanks.
Here’s why this is bad for you. I will use the fact that you posted my name on a public forum (knowing my circumstances) as one more reason to… what would ya’ll call it… ‘overreact’ or ‘do something stupid’ if vandalism continues to happen to my property.
Cops are useless. They can’t do anything. Already had em out here once and have called them twice.
You don’t somehow think I’m kidding, do you? I’ve already asked you not to post my name and yet you do it again.
What happens when a citizen is put in danger by another citizen exercising their right to free speech (posting a name on a forum, an otherwise harmless thing).
The State gives one citizen a right to put me in danger, but only because the State has portrayed me as dangerous.
Finally, the State then cannot protect me from its own citizens… who it has told i am dangerous.
… one if which is a crazy Christian cat lady who thinks she’s a philosopher and wants to chop my dick off if she can’t find someone else to do it by giving them my full name on a forum.
What is so dangerous, so nutso about this, is that if i was put in danger she would be okay with that because “it’s all in god’s hands”.
Could be locals who know me. Couple guys I used to do work for found out that i wasn’t a child molester… or was, rather… and cut me off. Lost thousands of dollars in work. These guys gossiped around and i was told to burn in hell by one’s wife… so it could be locals.
Could also be a forum person or persons, organized into a corny little cult or just some random asshats. I have no idea.
In any event, who it is is irrelevant. What IS relevant is that it is up to the State to stop them, or, reimburse me for any damage. I bet you guys can even figure out why without me telling you.
No?! Jesus. Because if they don’t, i have to, and i can’t stop it without doing something illegal. I can’t move because my new address will be posted on the SOR, and i can’t sit up all night guarding my stuff (i have to work). Ergo, I’d have to go ghost mode. And there’s no turning back if that happens. No walking into the sheriff’s office a month later and saying “i made a mistake”. No. I get an automatic irreversible two class F felonies and am gone for at least ten years. Can’t do ten more years on top of the six i already shouldn’t have done.
Ghost mode means complete emancipation from even the slightest moral obligation to anyone. If I’m hungry, have exhausted all other options (grocery store stealing, eat 'n run, no fish are biting, etc), want a hot dog, and i see someone with a hotdog… I’ll shoot em and take that hotdog. That’s what ghost mode means. Ghost mode is very serious shit.
I know that, you know that, but would the average citizen take the time to remind themselves of that when evaluating an indecent exposure incident involving a minor, or would they do that thing where all sex offenders are and must be predatorial rapists and child molesters?
I propose that every state require viewers of their registries to pass an exam before viewing. The lesson/exam would include an orientation on statutes and DSM diagnostics. Before the viewer got past that page, they’d be like a goddamn psychiatrist slash law school student and know wtf they were about to have an opinion on rather than some shmuck off the street who thinks we SOs are cool with that shit.
Tell why this nonsense still goes on. SOs are pussies. You can beat em into their goddamn mother’s basements and destroy their lives, and instead of fighting back, they’ll just get a nice gaming system and TV and never leave the basement again.
You give me five well armed wrongfully accused, oversentenced, or misclassifed SOs who are ready to get this shit on, and I’ll have the federal government either drastically changing or dropping SORNA like a bad habit. Five. Five’s all i need.
Btw when everyone goes googling my name, don’t bother with the home facts vigilantes radar system for tracking SOs because they deleted my page after i threatened to sue them for libel.
36 sex crimes they had listed. 36. This page had been up for years until i caught it.
