e=mc^2 (if descriptive—has existential import, not merely hypothetical category) does not describe AN instance, but every instance - even if only one (only takes one whole instance to be more than merely hypothetical) ….

So if each instance of e=mc^2 does not have the same identity (is not the same instance), but is after same pattern that describes it (each instance of all instances)…

then this is the question:

What kind of non-empty/-hypothetical category (cuz has existential import) is that called?

What if it stops having existential import—does it become hypothetical?

What if there is such a category that can never become a hypothetical?

That category would describe God.

Er, I mean, would that category describe God? hehe snort

If “hypothetical (empty) category lacks existential import” is also found in set theory with the empty set, is there a square (hexagon, whatever) of opposition for set theory also, or can one construct one to show synonymous terms between set theory/logic & category theory/logic? Please.

“indefinite propositions … read generically, such as ‘A dodo is a bird’, … (arguably) can be true now without there being any dodos now, because being a bird is part of the essence of being a dodo.”

[That hexagon of opposition (google it) applies to future WE don’t (necessarily) know, but God does… js. May need word other than hypothetical. Perhaps suprathetical…formathetical?]

Can you calculate how much modulability we began with (original position including/excluding both modulability & complexity/modulation) and how much modulability is left — if exhaustible — are we basically talking entropy?

If it began modulated (does low entropy imply modulation?)… does that not imply a modulator? Is the modulation just considered the structure of … yada … if so, why didn’t it keep its structure?

Is the reason we can’t tell if it rests &/or reverbs (“originally”) because of the halting problem?

What I hope to end up at is a tool like the square of opposition (I want to call it something like a diamond, prism, or lens… or litmus… or filter) that can test the truth, beauty, and goodness of any position (requiring it embodies the harmonic triads), and reveal hidden implications one might not have considered. It is not an invention, and I am not the first one to discover it.