People who say centralization doesn’t work forget that period of human history where a centralized monarchy existed virtually everywhere across the planet for several thousands of years.
Capitalist liberal propaganda has done well waging war against government centralization on the behalf of the wealthy.
I am definitely not saying that centralisation didn’t work. That would be just as ridiculous as saying Capitalism never worked. Both those things were highly effective in the past, the right paradigms at the right time. As populations grew, monarchy fixed the problems of tribalism, and feudalism, which were both getting way out of hand and impeding progress. Monarchy enabled more rational trade with neighbouring nations, and introduced true international diplomacy.
Capitalism is literally an injection of steroids for the body any society, and as long as it is tempered by a reasonably competent government which also has other interests, leads to all kinds of wonderful developments and inventions. But steroids don’t have a very nice effect on the body if you use them for too long, muscle becomes concentrated and deformed, too much strain is put on the heart, and the mind is also negatively affected and uncontrollable aggression can result. I think that metaphor works quite well.
But now we live in a world where they are advocating centralisation to such an extent, that they propose Globalism, where every single human is affected by every single decision, decisions which are made by people that have been elevated so far above the populace, that they might as well be gods. No room for further societal evolution, no healthy competition between groups, no freedom of movement, just slaves.
I don’t necessarily oppose Communism, and I see at least some merit in Capitalism, but Globalism? Fuck that.
I am a national communist as I support nationalism fully. Globalism should be fully opposed.
Then our ideologies are not working at cross purposes, certainly not at the moment.
MrAuthoritarian:
I am a national communist as I support nationalism fully. Globalism should be fully opposed.
K: national communist? that doesn’t even make sense… nationalism is
something that Marx opposed… he thought in terms of classes,
the ruling class: the Bourgeoisie, and the working class: the proletariat…
not nations…
Kropotkin
Where exactly did Karl Marx ever say,
“Global government is a fantastic idea, we should abolish nation states everywhere!”
He never said any of that of course.
You’re thinking of Leon Trotsky who perverted Marxism with his global aspirations.
Somebody who is the smartest guy in every room like you should know that already.
Yes, a working class revolution that takes place inside of nation states. He never intended to get rid of nations themselves.
We both oppose Globalism. We both advocate socialism. Those are two of the biggies, MrA.
how to save government is through gaming. They must go through a serious of gaming tests so that the public can see how their minds process information.
Right now the government has no transparency. Area 51 is a secret. Everything is a secret. Donald Trump campaigns on his platform as “president of peace” then ends up being a warhawk. Politicians offer no transparency meanwhile the government spies on everybody. Its very one-sided.
@MrAuthoritarian the reason you oppose globalism is because you are afraid of centralized government. Your stance on being pro-centralized national government and anti-globalism lacks coherence.
K: a simple reading of the ‘‘Communist Manifesto’’ shows us
how wrong you are, for example this passage from the second section:
‘‘The Communists are distinguished from the other working-class parties by this only: 1. In the national struggles of the proletarians of the different countries, they point out and bring to the front the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all nationality. 2. In the various stages of development which the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through, they always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.’’
K: elsewhere he writes about how Nations are a temporary aspect
of civilization… He doesn’t think in terms of nations… his vision
is about class, regardless of what nation one is from…
reread the Communist Manifesto… it’s all there…
Kropotkin
I oppose globalism because I understand the kind of evil individuals who push for it that covet after grand ideas of global conquest.
The kinds of people who would make themselves kings and gods of our entire global planet. The kinds of people who would make the entire global planet their slaves, if not into something even worse.
So like any sane rational person I oppose globalism completely.
Stalin helped the working class and proletariat revolution inside of Spain for a time from a long distance. Did that mean Soviet Russia wanted to absorb and takeover over Spain?
No, it meant that Stalin was helping an international proletariat revolution take shape but one where that didn’t dissolve or threaten the Russian Soviet nationalist state itself.
You liberals obsessed with your open borders and abolition of nation states might as well call yourselves Trotskyists, you basically sound exactly the same with your visions of global government or naive global social utopia fantasies.
It’s simple, I am a Stalinist and Maoist.
Nationalism added with Marxism and communism is my ideal nation state.
I am a nationalist through and through.
What kind of game would it be?
MrAuthoritarian:
I oppose globalism because I understand the kind of evil individuals who push for it that covet after grand ideas of global conquest.
The kinds of people who would make themselves kings and gods of our entire global planet. The kinds of people who would make the entire global planet their slaves, if not into something even worse.
So like any sane rational person I oppose globalism completely.
K: actually, the only path forward is through Globalism…
Which is why I advocate democracy and voting rights as
paramount… it stands in opposition to ‘‘kings and gods’’
but the fact is, you have advocated for dictatorships,
more than once… and what you describe as globalism
being a path into dictatorship, you in fact have advocated for this
point of view… turning local, national dictatorships into global
dictatorship is what you are advocating for… Hitler failed
because he didn’t reach his global dictatorship, just a European
dictatorship…
and if you read an honest book about socialism/communism,
you will see what a crisis of World War 1 was to them…
some socialists turned to nationalism, but they did so,
in opposition to socialism orthodox… which is globalism,
not nationalism… and they were rightly so, criticize by
other socialist for speaking out for nationalism, not
in terms of classes, the proletarian and bourgeoise…
Kropotkin
Its Bizarre to me how politicians want to put cameras everywhere to spy on people and harvest data from apps. Its politicians that are the ones that should have cameras everywhere so that the public can watch them.
Are politicians public servants, or feudal lords? Modern politicians feel more like our masters than servants… Masters that live in darkness and closed doors.
Politicians should have 2 bodycams on them at all time… 2 because the other one may run out of battery or fail and need auxiliary backup. No more secrete backroom deals and conspiracies. Everything politicians do should be out in the open, as the public servants they are meant to be.
Politicians are our servants, not our masters.
It would be a series of games, trials by fire, through the gauntlet.
It is strange to me how in tribal societies men had to go through some rite of passage, just to be a man. But in political societies, all a politician has to do is accept bribe money from corporations and be a slave, and that is what makes the politician “worthy” to rule a nation.
So you think potential leader should have to go through a “trial by fire” before they are qualified to lead? That’s a pretty interesting idea..
Idk. After you giga-blackpilled me with your new video I don’t know my views are on politics anymore.