You are talking gibberish.
How about you women just piss off and go and read something stupid, something English?
Just because it is beyond your abilities you name it gibberish. The provocative emotions, namely love, can cause blindness to truth. As Hb, defends his postings and becomes upset at us what emotion would be at the core?
Love for wisdom awakes blindness for truth? Maybe just blindness for utilitarian truths, but certainly not for anything about human relationship, in contrary!
No - it’s because you are not making any sense; you are making false statements; and none of them apply to me.
You still have a bug up your arse about some disagreement we had days ago, and so invented this paltry bit is inflammatory nonsense to pretend to yourself you can win an argument.
But the argument is not one I am having with you. It’s a thing of your imagination.
Let’s unpack it for a moment.
Love begat obsession which becomes protective defensive irrational fears
I mean, what the fuck is this supposed to mean??
I just knew you would like that one.
It is apparent that he is utterly loyal to his type of human. This like all love is taught. He was taught to love so obsessively his type, that it has become " protective defensive irrational fears" of others that are not like him and his. He protects against possible infiltration (breeding with other types). He spreads words of fear and despising to defend his stance and type. Fear of losing what he loves obsessively permeates his posts. All but his type are decadent. He cannot see the utter decedence that pours from his love.
It’s more clear now, sorry to be slow.
I only disagree that he has any ‘love’ on show here. And as you know I don’t see love as decadent.
I think bitter and twisted might better describe him than “decadent.”; out of date and deluded by early 20thC assumptions about race, which are nothing more than primitive tribalism.
Nope its HB. But, you can fit in there too.
Your mind is closed. You have your way and beliefs, anything else is wrong or gibberish… Yep, you fit right into a corner of it. Ready to stop responding yet?
Decadence is simply letting everything run as equal by default. 
As far as Bowey is concerned, anyone see “Hunger” with Catherine Denauve? Well vampirism is the last decadent frontier. Love has traded places with consumerism. The love of the utilitarian tradeoff. That’s the price of love: to reverse decadence, are You willing to give up everything else?
" Decadence is simply letting everything run as equal by default. "
That’s exactly right. It’s accepting everything except the possibility of consciousness, intent.
Intent is by definition “racist” to the decadent, because it compels one to discriminate - to judge based on natural preference.
Natural preference is, again, “racist” - the ultimate goal is to have a homogenous goo.
Decadence would argue the point of what is choosing by natual preference? What is natural?
Homogeneous goo? Really? Where did you study biology? I wish to make sure no one I know goes there.
It is impossible to breed humans to the point all will have the same skin, the same bone structure etc. The diversity is too great. The only thing interbreeding will accomplish is a superior being, with a few exceptions. Such prejudice is based upon an idiotic obssession. It has turned healthy love and pride into a decadent shallow ignorant pleasure filled addiction . Pathetic, I would feel sorry for you but, I can’t bring myself to do so. I will hope you have a grandchild or three of mixed heritage. Maybe then you will learn
FC was a bit ironic I guess. Natural is character and temperament as the feeling of strength. We humans make it out of the upbringing.
But intermixing without love will make nothing, only damage to a child. One must know what exactly is he bringing into the child so that the values can be added to each other. Today I’m afraid the characterlessness is the only desired option, the homogeneity. That is probably why we have the public education. It is counter-upbringing, formless, traditionless, ancestorless, void of future, children are “left to chose by their own” … why need a character then? Character is not decadent…
and why is the industrial gone? Because rich Whites want to make a penny regardless, so they outsourced and moved industry to poorer nations. It wasn’t Culture that moved industry, it was naked capitalism.
For me there are many kinds of moving Beauty in art and I would hate if the classical model was the only one. To have Clean lines, utter balance, distinct objects, only teaches us to see certain things, understand certain things, perceive in certain ways, apart from the aesthetic Power of other forms than classical ones.
That said, there are a good number of postmodernists and others who work in classical styles of art.
I couldn’t figure this sentence out.
You suffer from a common conceptual problem that leads you to a misinterpretation of historical and cultural change.
These categories are not mutually exclusive, neither are they strictly definable and complete.
There are no boundaries to , they are not distinct species that are capable of dying off, they are limitless and unbounded.
What you term the “greek” culture owed much to it contact with Egypt and the East.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Athena
ALl of them are “Aryan”, or have connections with it, without exception.
None of them died out, but have evolved together, in relationship with each other and separately. But all in ways that form a serious challenge to your way of thinking.
I was thinking about the Aryanism of the IE people, but there was a moral and religious degeneration ofter the exodus from Aryana Vaejo - the land of the Aryans on Caucasus. And we also don’t know much about the racial type of those Caucasians. We see many of them have intermixed with other races too… and I think only the Greeks have managed to reestablish a higher race out of such a possible mix of people. Nietzsche calls the Greeks “highest culture ever” and Vollgraff has valued religion perhaps way too much … the ideal culture would create a religion with neither exclusively good nor exclusively evil gods or titans, but rather with a temper.
" the ideal culture would create a religion with neither exclusively good nor exclusively evil gods or titans, but rather with a temper. "
That is the formula that we see in noble pantheons, the Greek and the Germanic ones. No God or Titan there is evil or “innocent” , it is simply a chemistry of different temperaments. of course these were derived from the natural conditions and elements, the Sun, moon, the planets (Jupiter was always the source of Zeus, Marduk, Baal, Odin, etc) - i.e. on existing influences, not on abstractions of conduct, - the wisdom=>custom=>law degeneracy you talked about.
?