Again, I will suggest people read and re-think their replies here before they post, and especially ‘you’ “greenfuse”.
If you thought far more deeply about what you are actually saying and writing here, then maybe you will NOT so many Falsehoods, and nor be as Wrong as you are as often as you are.
I will also, again, suggest that people obtain actual proof for their claims and beliefs here before they make those beliefs and claims publicly known, and especially more so in a philosophy forum of all places.
‘I’ still stand behind what ‘I’ have said and written since my first post in philosophy forums, and this is because can back up and support it with proofs and facts.
anew doesn’t understand that the issue with ad homs is not whether they are correct or not, but rather they are beside the point and a kind of power move as distraction. Here we see another human who is not curious is has no substance in the discussion, as one example amongst thousands. It does not support anew’s position. It does not critique the other person’s position. It is ‘to the man’, ad hominem, and negative, and off topic.
of course anew thinks his insults and condescension are objective or he asserts they are anyway. Most people think their insults are objective. What a great defense! (sarcasm for the overly literal readers) It’s quite rare that people insult and while still angry say their insult is merely the expression of anger but not objectively true. Yes, yes. I know anew claims he never get angry. As if that’s somehow morally better. I insult people, but not because I am angry, LOL.
I have asked “greenfuse” several times if it will define ‘ad hom’, considering it uses those words and that term here so much. “greenfuse” has not. Again, this is because of the absolute fear that “greenfuse” has and is holding on to here, but “greenfuse” is unaware of this.
Projection, again.
I have already shown and proved how “greenfuse’s” belief here is NOT what “greenfuse” believes is the absolute truth here. But, and again, because of “greenfuse’s” absolute belief here, it was not able to recognise and see the proof that was provided and demonstrated.
What are you basing this belief and claim of yours here on exactly, “greenfuse”?
LOL “greenfuse” still cannot comprehend and understand that when one is closed off from ‘looking at’ and ‘seeing’ something, and that calling ‘the one’ doing that closed or stupid is NOT an insult at all. What it is, actually, is just expressing and informing ‘the other’ of what they are really doing.
“greenfuse” is, literally, still being so utterly BLIND, DEAF, CLOSED, and STUPID here.
LOL, LOL, LOL
I have NEVER EVER thought that, let alone said that anywhere here. Yet, “greenfuse” has, once again, managed to fool and deceive “itself” into believing something else that has NEVER been said nor written down anywhere.
Once again, “greenfuse” keeps providing perfect examples of HOW the brain reacts, Wrongly, Incorrectly, and deceitfully, when it is working in conjunction with the belief system.
It is like “greenfuse” makes up its own stories and narratives, and then starts talking to “itself” here.
‘you’ are ‘the one’ who said ‘you’ insulted people, and if you really now want to say and claim that you insult people because you are not angry, then okay.
But, the only one that you are fooling here “greenfuse” is “yourself”.
anew: Not giving an attitude of showing ‘respect’ to another, and instead just waiting until ‘the other’ ‘deserves respect’, is another major cause of WHY there is so much conflict, hatred, fighting, warring, and killing in ‘this world’, when this is being written.
Which anew is obviously a part of, given how much he will initiate disrespectful communication with people, often being the first in the thread to go ad, insult, condescend and pretend-mindread.
So, once again, anew enters a thread and introduces negative mindreading, condescension, ad homs AND hints at points of substance he could make, but opts not to.
More ad homs, no substance. Off topic basically. In a sense anew’s topic is positioning himself and lowering others.
This assertion is part of anew’s odd royal rhetoric, where it is as if he grants people the freedom to do things he looks down on. And, as usual no substance related to the thread topic.
Now he focuses a bit on the topic and simply states his opposed opinion with no justification. If he acts like he has in the past, he will refer to this as when he refuted what Seeds wrote.
And back again to generalized ad homs, insults and condescension. Tossing in an unjustified assertion at the end.
Here he is essentially mocking Seeds while not understanding an important part of what it is to be human for most people. If he understood, he could actually meet that experience, but all he can do is look down on it.
And after mocking the entire idea of Seeds post, now he chastizes him for not going further with it.
Yes, Seeds should have posted with anew’s feeling that this is normal included. How could he have posted on this topic without mentioning that for anew of course this is normal? What an oversight!
anew’s posts are essentially declarations about himself. In terms of format they look like responses. But they are just yet again him saying that everyone including seeds here, doesn’t understand stuff as well as anew and anew knows so very very much.
So, trolling another thread and best ignored there.
Again, because “greenfuse” believes, absolutely, that ‘the way’ ‘I’ communicate with human beings is ‘disrespectful communication’, then ‘disrespectful communication’ is what “greenfuse” “sees” from ‘me’ here. Also, because of this absolute belief of “greenfuses” here it is also NOT able to ‘look at’, ‘hear’, and ‘see’ any differently here.
LOL There is NO ‘other way’. So, NO ‘justification’ was needed.
LOL NO one could produce absolutely anything that could refute it. Therefore, again, NO ‘justification’ was needed.
LOL Again, NO ‘justification’ was needed. Absolutely NO one could refute this also. NO one could produce anything that could disprove what I refuted by just ‘my claim’ alone.
Which, by the way, “greenfuse” was part of ‘the point’ “seeds” was pointing out and showing.
But, obviously, ‘you’ were too busy focusing ‘on me’ alone here, as usual.
“greenfuse” still believes, ABSOLUTELY, that a ‘just objective observation’ somehow elevates one above another. Which, obviously, could not be any further from the irrefutable Truth here.
Once again, “greenfuse” ‘alludes’ only. it does this because its irrational fear will not let it just be direct, open, and honest.
Because “greenfuse” is SO BLIND and DEAF here, due to its absolute beliefs here, it could not recognise and notice that ‘I’ have NOT ‘mocked’ absolutely anyone here.
But, obviously, saying and claiming what it has here, in ‘the way’ that it did here, helps it garner more help and support for its goal here.
Again, “greenfuse” has misread and misunderstood what I said and meant here, like it usually does.
See how “greenfuse”, once again, ‘tries to’ deflect away from what I actually said and meant, and turned things around to be about something entirely different, that I have NEVER talked about NOR mentioned anywhere.
LOL What an absolute joke.
And “greenfuse’s” ultimate goal is being exposed and revealed here again, further.
“greenfuse” believes, absolutely, that EVERY one should ignore ‘my words’ because “greenfuse” believes, absolutely, that ‘I’ could NOT know the Truth of things and know HOW what ‘I’ am creating could be created.
However, I am glad to see you guys directing attention over to my thread - Watch me “squish” the Earth - things are a bit slow over there in the Philosophy of Science Forum.
LOL, Coming from the two who copy and paste my posts and/or continue to talk ‘about me’.
LOL ‘These two’ do not respond to what I actually say and write here, by questioning, critiquing, and challenging my views and claims, no they prefer to ‘try to’ attack ‘my character’ instead. And, in a ‘philosophy forum’ of all places.
Will do. I wonder if the new posts responded at all to what I actually said, pointed out, and noted about the opening post there.
These are quotes anew had in a post supposedly a response to my post, but as usual he is just using posts as jumping off points to claim things without justification, hint at knowledge he doesn’t mention, position himself as a font of knowledge, imply negative things about people - here ‘experts’ for some reason. Just a bunch of substanceless guru/cult leader trash that no one asked for or is interested in. There are entities in the world who can manage to have positions like anew has and have some knowledge about how to relate to people. It is amazing that he thinks he is this eternal entity with so much knowledge and so many solutions and he hasn’t the slightest idea, after and eternity, how to communicate with people. Nor does he seem to understand that what he’s doing is not philosophy, but rather, well, guru shit. In a philosophy forum no less.
There being the thread where seeds has his topic. But anew sees what he wants to see.
Anew has no memory so he doesn’t remember that we have done that and what one experiences after early half-justifications is mindreading, ad homs, insults and condescension from anew when the conversation does go the way he wants. When he can’t justify his position or refute criticism, he attacks. Anew can’t even imagine that people learn from their experience of him that he is not a healthy discussion partner.
I’d frame it as pointing out his toxic behavior and the cognitive limitations of a bully who thinks he knows pretty much everything of value. This entity cannot be humbled because it cannot notice anything ego-dystonic. But it is interesting noticing the patterns. Because would-be cult leaders, narcissists and toxic personalities of all kinds, out in the real world, pull the same kinds of BS, and so it’s useful to catalogue these patterns with someone who pulls this BS all the time. It’s like hitting the archetype in its purest form.
See HOW literally disinterested ‘these people’ were in coming to learn, understand, and know more and new/er things.
LOL ‘I’ just put claims forth. And then wait for those with interest.
WHY “greenfuse” believes, absolutely, that ‘this’ demonstrates and proves that ‘I’, supposedly and allegedly, do NOT have the “slightest idea about how to communicate with people”, ‘I’, for One, would love to see “greenfuse’s” logic and reasoning here.
‘We’ are in a ‘philosophy forum’. ‘I’ say and claim that ‘I’ have proof for ‘my claims’, like, for example, for ‘my claim’ of HOW the Universe is infinite and eternal, and for HOW the Mind and the brain work.
Now, ‘I’ just wait for those with enough interest and curiosity in this ‘philosophy forum’, to come forth.
Whereas, ‘you’ will keep on ‘trying’ your hardest to get people to IGNORE me and NOT communicate ‘with me’.
Which appears to be what ‘you’ consider to be ‘philosophy’, in this ‘philosophy forum’. But it does not matter, as the proof will ALWAYS remain, waiting for those who have and show enough interest in wanting to learn more and become wiser.
So, ‘you’ really do want people to NOT ignore me and to communicate ‘with me’. But just NOT in ‘that thread’.
LOL ANYONE can ‘look back’ and see for “themselves” what Truly took place and occured, exaclty.
LOL
‘I’ am yet to find ‘one’ who seriously wants to have a Truly open and honest, logically reasoned, peaceful discussion.
But, do NOT allow this fact to stop you believing, absolutely, and you “seeing” that it is ALWAYS ‘me’ who is the so-called and so-classed 'unhealthy discussion partner ', “greenfuse”.
BUT, when ‘I’ point out the ‘toxic behaviour’ of “greenfuse” or of ‘adult human beings’, then it is ‘me’ AGAIN who has the so-called ‘toxic behavior’.
If and when people read ‘my words’ and ‘our discussions’, from the Truly open perspective, they will ‘see’ who is the Truly humble one here.
And, something ‘you’ may not have considered here, “greenfuse”, JUST MAYBE ‘I’ am coming across as ‘one’, like them, for a very particular reason and purpose.
Which, by the way, will all come to light soon enough.
Which, again, is WHY ‘I’ have been using ‘you’ here “greenfuse”.
‘you’ are ‘the one’ who has best been highlighting and re-repeating ‘my posts’ over and over, ‘for me’. Thus, providing the very examples that will prove ‘my claims’ irrefutably True.
Are ‘you’ aware of ‘the words’ and ‘works’ of “niccola machiavelli”?
Either way, they also come in very handy to prove what ‘I’ have been doing and demonstrating here.
To be able to get people to recognise and ‘see’ HOW and WHY ‘they’ have been in ‘a cult’ of their unknowing, and to be able to reveal, to them, HOW to escape ‘the cage’ that they have been STUCK in, some might say, ‘takes time’. And ‘I’ am certainly in NO rush here at all.
Amazing how he can assume his way to a misinterpretation that is ego-syntonic. So, first he doesn’t notice what I write and draws false conclusions. Then when this is pointed out finds a new misinterpretation that is ego-syntonic.
I don’t read much of his responses in this thread, since they are too predictable, but even dip-reading them always finds him doing quite the opposite of what he suggests others do.
What an ego! (watch how he will use ‘ego’ in coming attacks on me now) LOL, as if anyone reads this thread. Which is why I keep the criticism here. Everyone knows to avoid it and I can catalogue and perhaps the energy anew puts in here, which even I only read tiny parts of, if anything, will reduce the number of threads he interferes with.
And, again ‘this one’ will only ‘allude’ to something.
Again, ‘this one’ makes up an assumption, presumes it is true, then decides to believe it is absolutely true. But which obviously was based upon its own APE-thinking only.
If this really is what you want to believe and claim here to be the absolute truth, then okay.
I wonder if ‘this’ is an example or a projection of the ‘pretend mind reading’ that it keeps going on about.
Again, what it is directly referring to will NEVER be provided. What “greenfuse” is alluding to, ‘we’ will have to presume and guess.
Yes, this is what is wondered about with some of the posts you make here.
Okay.
So, “greenfuse” is talking to ‘someone’, presumably, tells them to 'watch what I WILL, reportedly, do), and then laughs out loud, and proposes, “as if anyone reads this thread”.
WHY? Because NO one is reading this thread, or for some other reason?
If it is the latter, then what is ‘that reason’, exactly?
Now it reads ‘tiny parts’ only.
If it reads ANY of what I write.
It does not matter what you say or do not say; this will have no bearing at all on what threads I respond to or do not respond to.
So, here we have anew going ad hom, condescending, etc. in yet another thread. Note the utterly useless Are you 100% absolutely sure and certain of this? Note the ludicrous redundancy: it’s not enough that The Emotion be sure. He has to be 100% absolutely sure and certain. This distracts from the discussion. If offers no counter argument. I focuses on the person and not the topic. It’s cult leader manipulation, and, well, kinda dumb.
Notice how anew shifts the burden. A very common practice of his. He makes the claim that it could only be this way, but does not justify this, earlier in his pontification post, but rather expects The Emotion to offer proof.
And he LOLs away at an assertion of The Emotions, rather than, in a philosophy forum, explaining why he thinks The Emotion is incorrect. He includes the Can you really not see…? format for the last sentence. Of course, anew is not being insulting when expressing incredulity that the other person doesn’t see something. No. Why is what he does there not an insult? Because he says it isn’t. It’s perfect. Cake and eat it too. Go ad hom. Don’t add substance. Laugh at the supposed inabilities of the person you are discussing something with.
And here we have anew making a bunch of assertions and calling it a proof. And offering more the same, batches of assertions, if people want more proof. In a philosophy forum no less.
anew: As always, if anyone would like to any further proof, then let’s have a discussion.
See how “greenfuse”, once again, shows and proves just how much it hates openness and honesty, especially when it is about speaking and writing directly about what it wants to say and mean. This is WHY “greenfuse” continually ALLUDES ‘to things’ instead. What is also very clearly seen is “greenfuses” absolute fear and hatred of just being direct in answering and clarifying questions posed to it.
I just asked someone if they were 100% absolutely sure and certain of ‘their claim’, but “greenfuse” HATES when it is asked to just clarify its claims, so now, LOL, it is ‘trying to’ claim that it is ‘utterly useless’ for clarifying questions to be asked, so that a better understanding could be obtained.
Unlike ‘these people’ here like “greenfuse”, who are LOCKED UP within ‘a cult’, I, first, seek out ‘clarification’, again to obtain and gain a better ‘understanding’, and then I choose how to move forward.
See, I have already learned that it is actually ‘utterly useless’ to ‘try to’ argue for or against ‘a point’, which ‘the other’ was NEVER even making NOR meaning to begin with.
So, again, seeking out and obtaining actual clarification and clarity, first, before proceeding always brings out the best outcome for everyone involved.
But, as always, “greenfuse” is absolutely free to believe absolutely anything of its own making up and/or choosing.
Again, “greenfuse” is showing another very common practice of its by alluding to ‘something’, without ever being ‘direct’. “greenfuse” does this because it fears being ‘caught out’, which is very common of those who like to ‘manipulate’ and ‘control’ others, for their own devilish and deceitful purposes.
Here, “greenfuse” will not even inform ‘us’ of what thread it is even going on about here. ‘We’ are just meant to guess and presume which one.
Again, “greenfuse” talks about ‘this way’, and ‘we’ are, again, just meant to guess and presume what “greenfuse” is alluding to.
Does anyone know what ‘this’ is in reference to, exactly?
Of ‘what’, exactly?
Was it NOT obvious, to you, WHY “emotion” was Incorrect?
Again, for clarification, and for clarity’s sake.
Some might refer to this as a great example of ‘ramblings’, at some of their best.
Is this an example of its claim that it is ‘I’ who focuses on ‘the person’, and not on ‘the topic’?
