Been quiet the last day or so due to the common cold…
and I happened to be online waiting for my cold medicine
to knock me out and I came across this little tidbit…
‘‘Maduro proves that the loony left loves dictators’’
and the basic idea is that because we are protesting this very
illegal action, we are in ‘‘love’’ with dictators…
Now there is so much wrong with this, that while waiting for
my cold meds to kick in, I shall explore this…
One: This military action to remove a head of state, violates
both American and international laws… and that is the part we
object to…for example, by his actions, he has declared war
against Venezuela, this act is a declaration of war which can
only be done by an act of congress… this is plainly written
in the Constitution… Only congress can declare war,
In the U.S Constitution, Article 1, section 8…
It doesn’t matter that Maduro is a dictator and hated
by his people, this action by IQ45 is illegal…
the official reason given was that it was an law enforcement
issue… but how does a Grand Jury indictment in New York,
allow the government to attack a head of state?
The official charge is crimes related to terrorism, drugs
and weapons… But then once again, how does a state/federal
grand Jury in NY, has any impact on the head of a foreign government?
Kropotkin clearly wants to protect a terrorist… but how does
clearly violating the law do anything to protect America?
IQ45 argument is clearly the ‘‘might makes right’’ argument,
for there is no international or American law that justifies
this action…
But then, we know for a fact, that there are many
dictatorships that also don’t obey international law,
what about them? Putin for example, why hasn’t
the American government gone after Putin after his many,
many actions of terrorism against both American and
other parts of the world? One might say, oh, Kropotkin,
there are laws about that? Well, I’m glad someone
notice that there are laws, both domestic and international
that are in place to prevent us from going after Putin…
But we have the might to oust Maduro, but do we have
the right? Ok, a citizen in France, kills another Frenchman,
but does the U.S have any right at all to intervene in this case?
That is the basic idea here that we can, but virtue of our military
might, have the right to intervene in the internal affairs of France?
No, of course, not… So, what laws in America allows us to
intervene in the affairs of Venezuela? The correct course of action,
would be to deal with it internationally, as it has a nation to
nation context… but that once again, relies on laws…
and the court at the Hague…
But IQ himself gave away the game by connecting this ouster
with oil… and that is what the goal is, to steal as much oil
from Venezuela as we can carry away… Shades of Iraq…
it has nothing to do with Maduro being a dictator or a terrorist
or even a bad president, it has to do with stealing oil…
And so given this context, we can’t expect to be quiet and
allow this repeat of Iraq to go unquestioned…
the left is about the laws and IQ45 has broken both
national law and international laws…
and how is that supporting a dictator? Given that IQ45 is
trying to be a dictator, supporting him is giving aid and comfort
to a wanna-be dictator… if you say silent about his illegal
action, then you support dictators and terrorists, which
IQ45 has shown himself to be…using public actions to
intimate or create change is the textbook definition of
a terrorists… and that describes IQ45 to a T…
Kropotkin
