I don’t think that revolution is going to happen using torches and pitchforks. It’s not even going to happen using guns. What’s needed is awareness, awareness of the process and what and who drives it. Awareness of the current methods used to divide, confuse and polarise.
Like I say, they have us all squabbling over outcomes. I’m personally not interested in the outcomes, unless they explain more of the workings of the process. I certainly don’t listen to what they say, that’s even less productive than focusing on the outcomes.
The bigger picture. If more people can see it, that really would be a revolution.
the next steps however will be the deal breaker…
he will try to have ‘‘military exercises’’ in either/or
Mexico or Cuba… but the real deal breaker will be
with his soon to be announced invasion of Greenland…
At that point, NATO either rolls over, or we have a full blown
war on our hands…Neither action bodes well for the future…
at that point, I wouldn’t be shocked if he announces some
sort of ‘‘peace’’ deal with Putin… and the US, just like that,
become a proud partner of Russia… with Russia being the
senior partner and us being the Junior Partner…
because IQ45 is a bottom to Putin’s top…
and at that point, all bets are off… literally anything can
happen at that point… Maybe congress will even grow some
balls…
nah, that ship has sailed… congress is now a eunuch…
better to serve his highness… dark days indeed…
Greenland is already taken. As far as western nations are concerned, the bothersome bureaucracy and red tape just need to be got out of the way, even the Danes know that. Not an opinion, just reality.
I’ll be lazy and just regurgitate AI output:
Greenland possesses vast natural resources, including rare earth elements, uranium, iron ore, gold, diamonds, zinc, lead, and potential oil and gas reserves, with growing international interest driven by geopolitical tensions and the global demand for critical minerals needed for clean energy technologies and electronics
As for some perceived alliance between Putin and IQ45, then maybe it’s prudent to ask - why?
Russia is the main strongarm of the BRICS. They have a lot of experience in dealing with U.S. aggression (and providing plenty of their own) so are ideally placed to offer true opposition to U.S. military might. The Chinese, while powerful, don’t like to fight, at least not militarily, that much should be obvious.
This “alliance” between Putin and Trump is because the rhetoric was being elevated to dangerous levels, if Hillary had been voted in, for example, then we might already be scrabbling in the ashes.
If not revolution then outright national collapse or world war. That’s where I see things going here, very pessimistic about the future prospects of our nation.
Congress and the senate along with most of the federal government has been captivated by Wallstreet. Until that is confronted nothing politically will change here.
I don’t think you understand, that’s not what they want to happen, at all. If it does, then the game is over, the board was tipped in anger, and everybody loses and crawls into bunkers. What then are they rulers of?
Your nation is suffering from neglect for the same reason as mine. There are bigger fish to fry, and in times like these, wealth doesn’t have to be generated at home, it can simply be stolen abroad, as you are witnessing with Venezuela.
The game has really just begun. All you can do is sit back and watch the show..
Never mind the rest of the world. It’s only ‘American lives’ that count right? ‘Interesting’ that it’s only Americans who refer to themselves in that way.
Perhaps in a bygone era justice found its motivation that way, but how is it working today? When people voice their dissatisfaction, especially online, who is listening? More often that not it’s other dissatisfied people, and the only thing that is achieved is agreement, very little is organised, it’s as if the focus has shifted from the actual problems to the very dissatisfaction itself.
We live in an era where people are forced to take sides, and so they do, and they stay on that side regardless of the outcome, because they feel a sense of belonging, which is a major component of internet discussion. Do you think that Donald Trump is even aware of the dissatisfaction that’s being expressed? What’s the point of voicing something without resulting action to realise it?
That’s what I see happening, people think they are having an effect by voicing their disgust, but they really aren’t. They are just forming impotent groups which are only loud within that group. People can pick and choose what they want to listen to and they do, what useful overview are they getting of the situation? Who are they causing to listen?
Do you have a problem with people voicing their political criticism against Trump? Does it make you unhappy to see it? Every movement starts with a fire under it and criticism is that fire.
No Gary, I don’t at all, and I agree with them. But I like to take a more zoomed out view of things, and that’s what I am trying to express. That fire has been burning for quite a while, does he show any signs of distress?
Yes. Support is starting to waiver for Trump according to approval polls. That’s better than sitting around and complaining that people are expressing criticism of Trump. That accomplishes even less. Don’t you think?
