Is peaceful anarchy possible?

Timocracy…..a return to traditional Indo-European values.

Start by liberating your language from its Abrahamic infections.

1 Like

@formeruser12

His belief system is basically the extremities of Social Darwinism taken to its most radical end.

:clown_face:

HA!!!

Nope.

Timocracy…..a system where citizenship is earned, not a right.

Nothing “radical” about reaffirming biological truths.

You nihilists are all the same.

1 Like

Let me guess.. people exactly like you would always earn citizenship, that’s a foregone conclusion, right?

1 Like

@niallm12

I would argue we can replace a corrupt government system with a better government system rid of bad actors, for me that is communism.

But anarchists always hate this with their insistence on zero state or zero government idealisms. This is why I find anarchists to be naive.

:clown_face:

Nope…..what applies to EVERYONE applies to me.

The standards are objective, not subjective….

1 Like

@MrAuthoritarian I’m not that kind of anarchist. I have a very open mind.. As I said, once Elon Musk and Bill Gates et Al have buggered off somewhere else, it’s over to you my friend..

1 Like

Bakunin was a communist…..

Anarcho-Communism - even the retard Kropotkin has no clue what he is proposing.

1 Like

@Kallikantzaros
You forget I am also an autocrat heavily against democracy as I don’t believe the masses of people are mentally capable of managing themselves.

:clown_face:

Kropotkin writes detailed posts, and responds to argument in detail. I guess the word “retard” is highly subjective..

1 Like

@Kallikantzaros

I am curious as to what your earned citizenship would look like as opposed to non-citizens. Hopefully it wouldn’t be a Spartan-Helot type system.

:clown_face:

@formeruser12

Kropotkin is your typical liberal democrat around here. If you’re talking about the forum member.

:clown_face:

@MrAuthoritarian
That’s fine. I have no problem with that. I have absolutely no problem with conservatives either. What I always have a problem with is people jumping into a topic with guns blazing and insulting people instead of providing a reasonable argument..

1 Like

@niallm12

Yes, debating and conversations can get intense here sometimes.

:clown_face:

1 Like

@formeruser12

Anarchism just doesn’t work the way anarchists constantly say it does, it always ends up in disaster full of conflict with people fighting each other which is why there are not a lot of people advocating for it.

:clown_face:

1 Like

@MrAuthoritarian

I don’t consider calling someone a “retard” either of those things..

1 Like

@MrAuthoritarian

I agree. That’s why I propose redefining “anarchy” to suit my own purposes and personal vendetta..

1 Like

@formeruser12

Agreed, but not everyone in this world is nice and pleasant like ourselves. Such is the harsh reality of this place, I just let it bounce off of me like rain hitting a metal surface.

Ignore it.

:clown_face:

@formeruser12

At some point you have to separate anarchism from statism and pick one or the other.

:clown_face:

Then continue interacting with his downhome postmodern delusions.

You two will get along.

1 Like