Love or what we call it is a necessary resulted outcome agnostic adherence, , resulted in ex-communicado of the intermittent gaps in knowledge, or the sequential fill of karmic law.
As such sequentially necessary pull, advances toward closer proximity from the futile nihilistic tendency of the energy pulling out, the overcoming is obvious.
Centripetal energy versus centrifugal energy is set off balance and the karmic energy moves the emotive toward the opposite, trying to fill in for the ‘other’ as reflections, and reflections of those.
This is an inward, unexpected journey to relieve the pressure that chosenness brings about, a kind of complex that can either be exhibited by inferiority or superiority.
Love either decompensated or, overcompensates according to the degree of magnification or or reduction in the image of the dissamblence created.
Love is a familial feeling that seeks familiar associations toward the resulting mechanism that involves the relation between the faintly familiar to the narrowly familial. It is a mechanism that increasingly binds , as the reduced familiality leads t I larger gaps of familiar assiciations, and tries to compensate for that structural loss to individuality.
The individual retains them, however transforming them into more formally vested structural awareness.
The potential energy is increased by transmission from the energy at gand, the energy generated from actual interaction.
I am coming into this analysis of love, confident that I can recall the variable interactions within it’s prigression, …
I am not at all weary of ‘loosing’ them , for the Hellnic superiority over it’s semetic counterpart has not yet been totally shown t I consist of variable ideology due for some kind of Marxist familial-familiar reductive process toward a metaphoric archiakogy by denoted mythological downward jump.
The nihilistic existential jump, acvordingly, has not really been demonstrated here, except by possibility through the contradictory process of objectively related analisys, which may signal some breakthrough process upending the possible to the real.
For these reasins, I find fear nOT to be the intentional base of the breakhtriugh, or as best expressed, the hypothetical base of transcendence.
Rather, fear actually fears layers of accumulated lack of the mode by which transcending them becomes more and more hypothetically removed from accessible forms.
Love, the energy, when it dies a complete cut off from it’s own source, as more then a hypothetical possibility, looses It’s own ground, and existential awareness becomes an antithetical certainty.
The opposite of love becomes it’s own undoing, an existentially denying evil into it’s possibilities: and evil creeps through the backdoor.
PS I thought that the above, ‘dasein’ form of analysis may not be sensible, but does lay some ground to the pronouncement that: Jews are not inferior to Greco-Romans on mere fact that they were enslaved by Egypt and Greco-Rome: inasmuch as slavery , primate faciae denote people literally into a subordinate positions in life.
Thought about the following without referring to the below: except generally per consciousness per Lori
Love is an undefined energy that gnosis through some kind of religious practice can focus into, it is elementary even undifferentiated from other forms of energy.
It has to objectify and differentiate, even without awareness of objective reality, and gnosis based analysis failed through Freud’s presumptions that were basically nihilistic through existential analysis
Nietzsche comes up again even if considered an afterthought reactionary.
