Love Ontology

It’s so genuinely inclusive of you to think of other people like that, Ec. It almost makes me forsake all others.

That’s what the pleasurable exclusive access problem is. Everyone is committing it. It’s what send us to hell.

I’ll teach another thing.,.

Contract theory.

We all contracted to live our lives here.

Let me tell you about the contract theory rapist who while he’s raping women, he says to them, “your spirit contracted for this so you could evolve”

There are no contracts in life. They are illusions.

Hell on the other hand is real.

Existence currently doesn’t have a heaven.

Only hell or deeper hell.

You broke your covenant to retire from teaching.

What does that really say about you?

_
“Only a psychopath thinks in terms of the single partner, paying no heed to the people left out.”

:laughing-rolling:

What is this guy advocating here?

Orgies?
:evilfun:

My pronouns are they/them.
Fuck they/them.

also… prostitution, hedonism, adultery… I didn’t want to put words in the guy’s mouth and say it, I wanted the guy to say it.

We don’t play/tolerate that game here…

Let’s fantasize…
In a multidimensional imaginary universe where everyone can be gratified without denying any other his/her gratifications, we are all avatars satisfying someone’s wet-dreams.

So, in one of those ‘realities’ I am someone fuck-doll, or they are mine…and in another they are your fuck-doll.
Existence is a huge orgy.

In one reality I eat a baby lamb’s ribs…in another I do not…in another it eats mine.
Everyone is happy.
8-[

It’s comforting to know that in some universe I am having sex with Phoeby Cates…and for some reason she wants it.

_
The younger version of Phobe, I would imagine?

My last celebrity crush was the guy from Starship Troopers and Sleepy Hollow, who married a Princess and cheated on her a’la Tiger Woods style. :neutral_face: I haven’t had a celebrity crush since, but I do find some attractive.

This[size=85]v[/size]… me…

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKYWi5WMJHQ[/youtube]

This[size=85]v[/size]… my ideal guy… when we think the Other is out cheating, the Other is out doing mad cray sh*t/definitely not cheating. :laughing:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP17-wdPXBY[/youtube]

What’s time to a Time-Lord?
Besides, my consent would be violated if in the multiverse time stood in the way of attaining my sexual fulfillment.

No “crush”…I wanted to crush her. O:)

I’m out for like minded others.

My sexual attraction is towards all women. Even the batshit crazy ones, as long as they don’t harm my body.

Then I’ll get to know them later.

I’m like a lot of men, they want the sex first then they learn the person later (or not). That’s a very masculine way of being.

Of course I don’t want STDs…. Like all of us.

Lel…

sounds like the match that lit hell on fire

Insanity sucks you into its patronizing vortex…like massive black hole taking you out of reality.
Some want to fall in and become lost - others are afraid of what lies down there in wait.

I mean, a few insane dolts on ILP.…but not only…
All across the interenets…some even appear to be sane, but if you listen to what they are saying, or sometimes shyly implying, then you get a whiff of their insanity.

Insanity is a disconnection form reality…I’ve described a philosophical/ideological movement that linguistically fabricates all sort of insane escapes from reality.
insanity is how the ego protects itself - and nihilism is defensive in its motives.
Insanity is a break from reality - a shattering, but sometimes it is intentional, willful, even if subconscious.
It has made a choice: see existence as it is, or survive, as long as possible, within it.
The insane mind cannot know it is insane, nor admit it.

IQ and awareness are not evolutionary objectives…evlution’s only rule is “adapt or die” and if going insane is a way of adapting, then the means to an end.

As I’ve noted elsewhere, philosophy is not for everyone.
Some of the greats either went crazy, after practicing it, or did insane things to endure existence.
Objectivity is the source of this threat - third-person perspective …or as Schopenhauer defined ‘genius’ - ‘will-less knowing’.
Denial of self is a means that becomes, for the insane ones, a pleasant end.

It’s how I’ve defined the difference between Hellenic & Abrahamic, or nihilistic, asceticism.
For Hellenism it is a means; for Abrahamism it is an end.

Reducing the impact of ‘will’ on one’s perceptions and judgements… determining one’s choices.
Will driven by need/suffering, and by desire.
The two pinnacles of stress: one from lack and the second, byproduct of the first, from excess.
Stress or Ennui.

When body is stressed, mind is engaged, focused, in a state of care.
When physical stress subsides to comfortable, pleasant, levels - called contentment - then the mind suffers the consequences of its energy surpluses, as boredom.
Libidinal anxiety/stress, product of sexuality, is a form of excess energies pressuring the mind to be expunged.
This, too, is a state of hormonally induced madness.

Now, from there we can go further and distinguish insanity that is determined by some kind of genetic dysfunction, or psychosomatic trauma - shattering the psyche in parts to compartmentalize its suffering - or it is self-induced, intentional, motivated by a desire to protect the ego form the implications of what it cannot endure.
In nature insanity leads to a quick end…but in sheltering human systems insanity can be self-induced and protected…even promoted as a mass coping mechanisms that also facilitates centralized control, mass manipulation and exploitation.
Moderns/Postmodern can afford to go insane because the collective is there to protect them from the consequences, and insanity has become the new norm.
Would not sanity be the weird one in an insane asylum?

Lorikeet.

You seem very angry that you’ll die forever.

You also seem angry that you’ll live forever.

You have your coping mechanisms for both of these.

You also haven’t met spirit yet. Maybe you’re too afraid. Something is resisting spirit in you.

While there are things one should be afraid.

You’re afraid of things you shouldn’t be.

I personally used my entire soul to destroy all existence forever.

Then I found out I can’t…. So… change of plan.

You don’t notice all the microscopic synchronicities in your life. You’re not even a mystic.

What? You think people have been making this shit up for eons and you’re smarter than them?

You’re lucky this is just a philosophy board to hash out ideas. Your posts all say rape is good, and if we don’t rape we are blind. Sure rape happens in all species…

Sure…. It’s a cruel world. Do you have the strength to not be cruel?

Ec.

Is there anything that you don’t consider rape?

I consent to this Platonic discussion.

Ichthus.

The no means yes problem isn’t rape as we all define rape…. We even define statutory rape.

The no means yes problem isn’t even statutory rape.

All the no means yes problem is, is that women are more uncomfortable with approach from men than men are from women. You can detect this is micro expressions. The way the no means yes problem works is that women reject approach reciprocation.

That causes men to get crossed wired and destroy, destroy, destroy. Just to see a pair of tits. It will destroy this earth.

Tempting! Where should we meet so that I might verify your identity?

No, wait.

I’m having second thoughts.